Jakobsen Klaus D, Callesen Kirsten, Larsen Ejnar B, Pedersen Ole B V, Didriksen Maria, Ostrowski Sisse R, Christensen Karl B
Psychiatric Private Practice, Jernbanegade 16, Fredensborg, DK-3480, Denmark.
Institute of Biological Psychiatry, Mental Health Centre St. Hans, Mental Health Services of the Capital Region of Copenhagen, Boserupvej 2, DK-4000, Roskilde, Denmark.
J Autism Dev Disord. 2024 Aug 17. doi: 10.1007/s10803-024-06511-2.
Systemizer Profile Questionnaire (SPQ), which has not been used before, investigates difficulties in mentalisation, sensory- and/or social sensitivity and social cognition (MSSSC) in subjects with Autism-Spectrum-Disorders (ASD) with and without Attention-Deficit-Hyperactivity-Disorder (ADHD). The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the SPQ domains, and to assess the predictive validity of the SPQ against the Ritvo Autism Asperger Diagnostic Scale (RAADS).
Three-hundred-fifty-four study subjects with ICD-10 verified ASD confirmed by RAADS and 354 controls matched on age group and gender were recruited and evaluated systematically with SPQ, standardized questions about demographic and clinical data. Hypothesized SPQ subscales formed from 85 items were evaluated using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Resulting revised sub-scales were confirmed using item response theory (IRT) and the predictive validity of the SPQ scores was evaluated using RAADS scores above 64 as the standard.
Twenty-two of the original 85 items were removed, resulting in an instrument with 63 items across nine psychometrically valid domains. These domains had high sensitivity (range: 0.64 to 0.84), and high specificity (range: 0.73 to 0.90). Positive predictive values (range: 0.76 to 0.89) and negative predictive values (range: 0.69 to 0.90) were also high. For the total SPQ score the sensitivity was 0.95, the specificity was 0.87, the positive predictive value was 0.88 and the negative predictive value was 0.95.
SPQ domains are valid descriptions/profiles of MSSSC given that ASD is confirmed by RAADS, though irrelevant if not, as SPQ is not a diagnostic instrument.
系统化者特征问卷(SPQ)此前未被使用过,该问卷用于调查患有和未患有注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)患者在心理化、感官和/或社交敏感性以及社会认知(MSSSC)方面的困难。本研究的目的是评估SPQ各领域的信度和效度,并评估SPQ相对于里特沃自闭症阿斯伯格诊断量表(RAADS)的预测效度。
招募了354名经RAADS确诊为ICD - 10确诊ASD的研究对象以及354名年龄组和性别匹配的对照组,并使用SPQ、关于人口统计学和临床数据的标准化问题对他们进行系统评估。对由85个项目组成的假设SPQ子量表使用验证性因子分析(CFA)进行评估。使用项目反应理论(IRT)对最终修订的子量表进行确认,并以RAADS分数高于64为标准评估SPQ分数的预测效度。
最初的85个项目中有22个被删除,最终形成了一个包含63个项目、横跨九个心理测量学有效领域的工具。这些领域具有高敏感性(范围:0.64至0.84)和高特异性(范围:0.73至0.90)。阳性预测值(范围:0.76至0.89)和阴性预测值(范围:0.69至0.90)也很高。对于SPQ总分,敏感性为0.95,特异性为0.87,阳性预测值为0.88,阴性预测值为0.95。
鉴于ASD已由RAADS确诊,SPQ各领域是MSSSC的有效描述/特征,但如果未确诊则无关紧要,因为SPQ不是诊断工具。