• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Ethical Challenges Experienced by Healthcare Workers Delivering Clinical Care during Health Emergencies and Disasters: A Rapid Review of Qualitative Studies and Thematic Synthesis.突发公共卫生事件和灾害期间提供临床护理的医护人员所面临的伦理挑战:定性研究的快速综述和主题综合。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2022 Jul-Sep;13(3):179-195. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2022.2063996. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
Future public health emergencies and disasters: sustainability and insights into support programs for healthcare providers.未来的公共卫生突发事件和灾害:对医疗保健提供者支持计划的可持续性和见解。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Oct 27;22(1):664. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04309-z.
4
Nurses' experiences of ethical preparedness for public health emergencies and healthcare disasters: a systematic review of qualitative evidence.护士应对突发公共卫生事件和医疗灾难的伦理准备经验:定性证据的系统综述
Nurs Health Sci. 2014 Mar;16(1):67-77. doi: 10.1111/nhs.12130.
5
Listening to the Voices of Health Care Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study Providing In-Depth Insights Into Ethical and Individual Challenges.倾听 COVID-19 大流行期间医护人员的声音:一项深入了解伦理和个体挑战的定性研究。
Qual Health Res. 2024 Sep;34(11):1029-1038. doi: 10.1177/10497323241231521. Epub 2024 Feb 26.
6
The effects of interactive training of healthcare providers on the management of life-threatening emergencies in hospital.医疗服务提供者的互动培训对医院危及生命的紧急情况管理的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Sep 24;9(9):CD012177. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012177.pub2.
7
Enhancing a Willingness to Respond to Disasters and Public Health Emergencies Among Health Care Workers, Using mHealth Intervention: A Multidisciplinary Approach.利用移动医疗干预增强医护人员应对灾害和突发公共卫生事件的意愿:一种多学科方法。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2023 Jul 21;17:e469. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2023.129.
8
Experiences and views of frontline healthcare workers' family members in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study.英国一线医护工作者家属在 COVID-19 大流行期间的经历和看法:一项定性研究。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2022 Apr 11;13(1):2057166. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2022.2057166. eCollection 2022.
9
A longitudinal qualitative exploration of victorian healthcare workers' and organisations' evolving views and experiences during COVID-19.一项针对维多利亚时代医疗工作者及其组织在 COVID-19 期间不断变化的观点和经验的纵向定性探索。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 May 7;24(1):596. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11067-z.
10
Mental Health Needs Due to Disasters: Implications for Behavioral Health Workforce Planning During the COVID-19 Pandemic.灾害导致的心理健康需求:对 COVID-19 大流行期间行为健康劳动力规划的启示。
Public Health Rep. 2023 May-Jun;138(1_suppl):48S-55S. doi: 10.1177/00333549231151888.

引用本文的文献

1
Disaster Nursing Competencies in a Time of Global Conflicts and Climate Crises: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study.全球冲突与气候危机时期的灾害护理能力:一项横断面调查研究
Int Nurs Rev. 2025 Jun;72(2):e70052. doi: 10.1111/inr.70052.
2
Strategies to support the mental health and well-being of health and care workforce: a rapid review of reviews.支持卫生与护理工作人员心理健康和福祉的策略:综述的快速回顾
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Mar 19;12:1530287. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1530287. eCollection 2025.
3
Ethical issues after the earthquake in Turkey: A qualitative study on nurses' perspectives.土耳其地震后的伦理问题:一项关于护士观点的定性研究。
Int Nurs Rev. 2025 Sep;72(3):e13048. doi: 10.1111/inr.13048. Epub 2024 Oct 26.
4
COVID-19 ethics: unique aspects and a review as of early 2024.COVID-19 伦理:截至 2024 年初的独特方面和综述。
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2024 Jun;42(1):55-86. doi: 10.1007/s40592-024-00199-x. Epub 2024 Jul 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Defining ethical challenge(s) in healthcare research: a rapid review.定义医疗保健研究中的伦理挑战:快速综述。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Sep 29;22(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00700-9.
2
Fallacy of the last bed dilemma.最后一张病床谬误。
J Med Ethics. 2022 Nov;48(11):915-921. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2021-107333. Epub 2021 May 31.
3
What is common and what is different: recommendations from European scientific societies for triage in the first outbreak of COVID-19.常见与不同之处:欧洲科学学会针对 COVID-19 首次爆发的分诊建议。
J Med Ethics. 2022 Jul;48(7):472-478. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106969. Epub 2021 May 12.
4
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
5
Vulnerability as a key concept in relational patient- centered professionalism.易损性:关系型以患者为中心的专业主义中的关键概念
Med Health Care Philos. 2021 Jun;24(2):155-172. doi: 10.1007/s11019-020-09995-8. Epub 2021 Jan 10.
6
Moral Decision-Making, Stress, and Social Cognition in Frontline Workers vs. Population Groups During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Explorative Study.新冠疫情期间一线工作者与普通人群的道德决策、压力和社会认知:一项探索性研究
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 19;11:588159. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.588159. eCollection 2020.
7
Real-world ethics in palliative care: A systematic review of the ethical challenges reported by specialist palliative care practitioners in their clinical practice.姑息治疗中的现实世界伦理:对姑息治疗专科从业者在临床实践中报告的伦理挑战的系统评价。
Palliat Med. 2021 Feb;35(2):315-334. doi: 10.1177/0269216320974277. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
8
Challenges, experience and coping of health professionals in delivering healthcare in an urban slum in India during the first 40 days of COVID-19 crisis: a mixed method study.在 COVID-19 危机的头 40 天里,印度城市贫民窟中卫生专业人员提供医疗保健的挑战、经验和应对措施:一项混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 18;10(11):e042171. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042171.
9
Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviews.考科蓝快速评价方法学组为快速评价提供循证指导。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Feb;130:13-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.10.007. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
10
Ethical dilemmas, perceived risk, and motivation among nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic.护士在 COVID-19 大流行期间的伦理困境、感知风险和动机。
Nurs Ethics. 2021 Feb;28(1):9-22. doi: 10.1177/0969733020956376. Epub 2020 Oct 1.

突发公共卫生事件和灾害期间提供临床护理的医护人员所面临的伦理挑战:定性研究的快速综述和主题综合。

Ethical Challenges Experienced by Healthcare Workers Delivering Clinical Care during Health Emergencies and Disasters: A Rapid Review of Qualitative Studies and Thematic Synthesis.

机构信息

Paediatric Bioethics Centre, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK.

Center for Bioethics, Faculty of Medicine, Clínica Alemana Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile.

出版信息

AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2022 Jul-Sep;13(3):179-195. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2022.2063996. Epub 2022 Apr 25.

DOI:10.1080/23294515.2022.2063996
PMID:35467462
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9881594/
Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has posed several ethical challenges worldwide. Understanding care providers' experiences during health emergencies is key to develop comprehensive ethical guidelines for emergency and disaster circumstances. To identify and synthetize available empirical data on ethical challenges experienced by health care workers (HCWs) providing direct patient care in health emergencies and disaster scenarios that occurred prior to COVID-19, considering there might be a significant body of evidence yet to be reported on the current pandemic. A rapid review of qualitative studies and thematic synthesis was conducted. Medline and Embase were searched from inception to December 2020 using "public health emergency" and "ethical challenges" related keywords. Empirical studies examining ethical challenges experienced by frontline HCWs during health emergencies or disasters were included. We considered that ethical challenges were present when participants and/or authors were uncertain regarding how one should behave, or when different values or ethical principles are compromised when making decisions. After deduplication 10,160 titles/abstracts and 224 full texts were screened. Twenty-two articles were included, which were conducted in 15 countries and explored eight health emergency or disaster events. Overall, a total of 452 HCWs participants were included. Data were organized into five major themes with subthemes: HCWs' vulnerability, Duty to care, Quality of care, Management of healthcare system, and Sociocultural factors. HCWs experienced a great variety of clinical ethical challenges in health emergencies and disaster scenarios. Core themes identified provide evidence-base to inform the development of more comprehensive and supportive ethical guidelines and training programmes for future events, that are grounded on actual experiences of those providing care during emergency and disasters.

摘要

COVID-19 大流行在全球范围内带来了若干伦理挑战。了解卫生应急期间医护人员的经历是为紧急情况和灾害情况下制定全面伦理准则的关键。本研究旨在确定并综合分析在 COVID-19 之前发生的卫生应急和灾害场景中直接护理患者的医护人员(HCWs)所经历的伦理挑战的现有经验数据,考虑到可能有大量证据尚未报道当前的大流行。对定性研究进行了快速回顾和主题综合分析。使用与“公共卫生应急”和“伦理挑战”相关的关键字,从开始到 2020 年 12 月,在 Medline 和 Embase 中进行了搜索。纳入了研究卫生应急或灾害期间一线 HCWs 所经历的伦理挑战的实证研究。我们认为,当参与者和/或作者对应该如何行为不确定,或者在做出决策时不同的价值观或伦理原则受到损害时,就存在伦理挑战。经过去重后,筛选了 10,160 篇标题/摘要和 224 篇全文。共纳入 22 篇文章,这些文章在 15 个国家进行,探讨了 8 次卫生应急或灾害事件。共有 452 名 HCWs 参与者纳入研究。数据被组织成五个主要主题和子主题:HCWs 的脆弱性、护理义务、护理质量、医疗保健系统管理和社会文化因素。HCWs 在卫生应急和灾害场景中经历了各种各样的临床伦理挑战。确定的核心主题为未来事件提供了循证基础,为制定更全面和支持性的伦理准则和培训计划提供了信息,这些准则和计划基于在应急和灾害期间提供护理的人的实际经验。