Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2022 Jun;23(6):e13614. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13614. Epub 2022 Apr 30.
This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of using a knowledge-based planning technique to detect poor quality VMAT plans for patients with head and neck cancer. We created two dose-volume histogram (DVH) prediction models using a commercial knowledge-based planning system (RapidPlan, Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) from plans generated by manual planning (MP) and automated planning (AP) approaches. DVHs were predicted for evaluation cohort 1 (EC1) of 25 patients and compared with achieved DVHs of MP and AP plans to evaluate prediction accuracy. Additionally, we predicted DVHs for evaluation cohort 2 (EC2) of 25 patients for which we intentionally generated plans with suboptimal normal tissue sparing while satisfying dose-volume limits of standard practice. Three radiation oncologists reviewed these plans without seeing the DVH predictions. We found that predicted DVH ranges (upper-lower predictions) were consistently wider for the MP model than for the AP model for all normal structures. The average ranges of mean dose predictions among all structures was 9.7 Gy (MP model) and 3.4 Gy (AP model) for EC1 patients. RapidPlan models identified 7 MP plans as outliers according to mean dose or D1% for at least one structure, while none of AP plans were flagged. For EC2 patients, 22 suboptimal plans were identified by prediction. While re-generated AP plans validated that these suboptimal plans could be improved, 40 out of 45 structures with predicted poor sparing were also identified by oncologist reviews as requiring additional planning to improve sparing in the clinical setting. Our study shows that knowledge-based DVH prediction models can be sufficiently accurate for plan quality assurance purposes. A prediction model built by a small cohort automatically-generated plans was effective in detecting suboptimal plans. Such tools have potential to assist the plan quality assurance workflow for individual patients in the clinic.
本研究旨在探讨使用基于知识的计划技术来检测头颈部癌症患者低质量 VMAT 计划的可行性。我们使用商业基于知识的计划系统(Varian Medical Systems,Palo Alto,CA 的 RapidPlan)从手动计划(MP)和自动计划(AP)方法生成的计划中创建了两个剂量-体积直方图(DVH)预测模型。我们预测了 25 名患者的评估队列 1(EC1)的 DVH,并将其与 MP 和 AP 计划的实际 DVH 进行比较,以评估预测准确性。此外,我们还预测了评估队列 2(EC2)的 25 名患者的 DVH,我们故意为这些患者生成了在满足标准实践剂量-体积限制的同时保留正常组织效果不佳的计划。三位放射肿瘤学家在不查看 DVH 预测的情况下审查了这些计划。我们发现,对于所有正常结构,MP 模型的预测 DVH 范围(上限-下限预测)始终比 AP 模型宽。对于 EC1 患者,所有结构的平均剂量预测范围分别为 9.7 Gy(MP 模型)和 3.4 Gy(AP 模型)。RapidPlan 模型根据至少一个结构的平均剂量或 D1%,确定 7 个 MP 计划为异常计划,而没有 AP 计划被标记为异常。对于 EC2 患者,预测出 22 个次优计划。虽然重新生成的 AP 计划验证了这些次优计划可以得到改善,但在临床环境中,通过预测发现的 45 个具有较差保留效果的结构中有 40 个结构仍需要进一步计划以改善保留效果。我们的研究表明,基于知识的 DVH 预测模型可以足够准确地用于计划质量保证目的。由小队列自动生成的计划构建的预测模型能够有效地检测到次优计划。这种工具有可能帮助改善临床中患者的计划质量保证工作流程。