Chan Tommy C Y, Yu Marco C Y, Chiu Vivian, Lai Gilda, Leung Christopher K S, Chan Poemen P M
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Eye Hospital, Kowloon, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
Department of Ophthalmology, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 21;11(1):14853. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93999-8.
To evaluate the repeatability and agreement of corneal and biometry measurements obtained with two swept-source optical coherence tomography (SSOCT) and a partial coherence interferometry-based device. This is a cross-sectional study. Forty-eight eyes of 48 patients had three consecutive measurements for ANTERION (Heidelberg Engineering, Germany), CASIAII (Tomey, Japan) and IOLMaster500 (Carl Zeiss Meditec, USA) on the same visit. Mean keratometry (Km), central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD) and axial length (AL) were recorded. Corneal astigmatic measurements were converted into vector components-J0 and J45. Intra-device repeatability and agreements of measurements amongst the devices were evaluated using repeatability coefficients (RCs) and Bland-Altman plots, respectively. All devices demonstrated comparable repeatability for Km (p ≥ 0.138). ANTERION had the lowest RC for J0 amongst the devices (p ≤ 0.039). Systematic difference was found for the Km and J0 obtained with IOLMaster500 compared to either SSOCTs (p ≤ 0.010). The ACD and AL measured by IOLMaster500 showed a higher RC compared with either SSOCTs (p < 0.002). Systematic difference was found in CCT and ACD between the two SSOCTs (p < 0.001), and in AL between ANTERION and IOLMaster500 (p < 0.001), with a mean difference of 1.6 µm, 0.022 mm and 0.021 mm, respectively. Both SSOCTs demonstrated smaller test-retest variability for measuring ACD and AL compared with IOLMaster500. There were significant disagreement in keratometry and AL measurements between the SSOCTs and PCI-based device; their measurements should not be considered as interchangeable.
评估使用两种扫频光学相干断层扫描(SSOCT)设备和一种基于部分相干干涉测量法的设备所获得的角膜和生物测量结果的可重复性及一致性。这是一项横断面研究。48例患者的48只眼在同一次就诊时,对ANTERION(德国海德堡工程公司)、CASIAII(日本多美公司)和IOLMaster500(美国卡尔蔡司医疗技术公司)进行了连续三次测量。记录平均角膜曲率(Km)、中央角膜厚度(CCT)、前房深度(ACD)和眼轴长度(AL)。角膜散光测量值转换为矢量分量J0和J45。分别使用重复性系数(RC)和Bland-Altman图评估设备内部的可重复性以及各设备之间测量结果的一致性。所有设备在Km测量方面均显示出相当的可重复性(p≥0.138)。在各设备中,ANTERION的J0重复性系数最低(p≤0.039)。与任何一种SSOCT相比,IOLMaster500所测得的Km和J0存在系统差异(p≤0.010)。IOLMaster500测量的ACD和AL的重复性系数高于任何一种SSOCT(p<0.002)。两种SSOCT在CCT和ACD方面存在系统差异(p<0.001),ANTERION和IOLMaster500在AL方面存在系统差异(p<0.001),平均差异分别为1.6μm、0.022mm和0.021mm。与IOLMaster500相比,两种SSOCT在测量ACD和AL时均显示出较小的重测变异性。SSOCT与基于部分相干干涉测量法的设备在角膜曲率和AL测量方面存在显著差异;它们的测量结果不应被视为可互换的。