• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用三种扫频源光学相干断层扫描设备对白内障患者眼部生物测量的比较。

Comparison of ocular biometric measurements in patients with cataract using three swept-source optical coherence tomography devices.

作者信息

Oh Richul, Oh Joo Youn, Choi Hyuk Jin, Kim Mee Kum, Yoon Chang Ho

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea.

Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

BMC Ophthalmol. 2021 Jan 27;21(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12886-021-01826-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12886-021-01826-5
PMID:33504333
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7839224/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Precise measurement of ocular biometry is critical for determining intraocular lens power. Newly developed swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) - based ocular biometric devices, ANTERION and CASIA2 provide ocular biometric measurements as IOLMaster 700. This study aimed to assess agreement between three devices.

METHODS

This retrospective comparative study includes patients with cataract who underwent ocular biometric measurements with three devices, ANTERION, CASIA2, and IOLMaster 700, at Seoul National University Hospital, in April 2020. Anterior keratometry, total keratometry, central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), and axial length (AL) were the main parameters for the comparison. To assess the agreement between the devices, intraclass coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis with 95% limits of agreement (LoA) were used.

RESULTS

A total of 47 eyes of 29 patients were measured with three devices. Average anterior keratometry showed excellent agreement (ICC ≥ 0.989), and the mean difference was less than 0.1 D. However, the ICC of the total average keratometry ranged from 0.808 to 0.952, and the difference was more than 0.43 D. The AL measured by ANTERION and IOLMaster 700 showed excellent agreement (ICC = 0.999), and the mean difference was 0.005 mm. The ANTERION and IOLMaster 700 did not obtain AL in six (12.8%) and three (6.4%) cases, respectively (P = 0.001 by Fisher's exact test). The CCT, ACD, and LT also showed excellent agreement (ICC > 0.9).

CONCLUSIONS

The new SS-OCT-based devices, ANTERION, and CASIA2 showed a good agreement with IOLMaster 700 in measuring ocular biometry except for the total keratometry. The AL of ANTERION and IOLMaster 700 showed excellent agreement.

摘要

背景

眼生物测量的精确测量对于确定人工晶状体度数至关重要。新开发的基于扫频源光学相干断层扫描(SS-OCT)的眼生物测量设备ANTERION和CASIA2与IOLMaster 700一样可提供眼生物测量。本研究旨在评估这三种设备之间的一致性。

方法

这项回顾性比较研究纳入了2020年4月在首尔国立大学医院接受三种设备(ANTERION、CASIA2和IOLMaster 700)进行眼生物测量的白内障患者。角膜前表面曲率、总角膜曲率、中央角膜厚度(CCT)、前房深度(ACD)、晶状体厚度(LT)和眼轴长度(AL)是主要的比较参数。为评估设备之间的一致性,使用了组内相关系数(ICC)和具有95%一致性界限(LoA)的Bland-Altman分析。

结果

共对29例患者的47只眼使用三种设备进行了测量。平均角膜前表面曲率显示出极佳的一致性(ICC≥0.989),平均差异小于0.1 D。然而,总平均角膜曲率的ICC范围为0.808至0.952,差异超过0.43 D。ANTERION和IOLMaster 700测量的AL显示出极佳的一致性(ICC = 0.999),平均差异为0.005 mm。ANTERION和IOLMaster 700分别在6例(12.8%)和3例(6.4%)病例中未获得AL(Fisher精确检验P = 0.001)。CCT、ACD和LT也显示出极佳的一致性(ICC>0.9)。

结论

新型基于SS-OCT的设备ANTERION和CASIA 在测量眼生物特征方面,除总角膜曲率外,与IOLMaster 700显示出良好的一致性。ANTERION和IOLMaster 700的AL显示出极佳的一致性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab3c/7839224/13e576a9c1c5/12886_2021_1826_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab3c/7839224/52a131a0f382/12886_2021_1826_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab3c/7839224/6854e223015f/12886_2021_1826_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab3c/7839224/13e576a9c1c5/12886_2021_1826_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab3c/7839224/52a131a0f382/12886_2021_1826_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab3c/7839224/6854e223015f/12886_2021_1826_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab3c/7839224/13e576a9c1c5/12886_2021_1826_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of ocular biometric measurements in patients with cataract using three swept-source optical coherence tomography devices.使用三种扫频源光学相干断层扫描设备对白内障患者眼部生物测量的比较。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2021 Jan 27;21(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12886-021-01826-5.
2
Comparison of Ocular Biometry Using New Swept-source Optical Coherence Tomography-based Optical Biometer with Other Devices.基于新型扫频源光学相干断层扫描技术的光学生物测量仪与其他设备的眼部生物测量比较。
Korean J Ophthalmol. 2018 Aug;32(4):257-264. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2017.0091.
3
Comparison of 2 swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometry devices.两款基于扫频源光学相干断层扫描技术的生物测量设备的比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021 Jan 1;47(1):87-92. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000373.
4
Agreement between 2 swept-source OCT biometers and a Scheimpflug partial coherence interferometer.两种扫频源光相干断层生物测量仪与 Scheimpflug 部分相干干涉仪的一致性。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021 Apr 1;47(4):488-495. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000483.
5
Comparison of measurements and calculated lens power using three biometers: a Scheimpflug tomographer with partial coherence interferometry and two swept source optical coherence tomographers.比较三种生物测量仪的测量值和计算的晶状体屈光度:带有部分相干干涉测量术的 Scheimpflug 断层扫描仪和两种扫频源光学相干断层扫描仪。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2024 Sep 19;24(1):410. doi: 10.1186/s12886-024-03658-5.
6
Repeatability of a new swept-source optical coherence tomographer and agreement with other three optical biometers.一种新型扫频源光相干断层扫描仪的可重复性及其与其他三种光生物测量仪的一致性。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022 Jul;260(7):2271-2281. doi: 10.1007/s00417-022-05579-9. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
7
Assessing the Validity of Measurements of Swept-source and Partial Coherence Interferometry Devices in Cataract Patients.评估扫频源和部分相干干涉测量仪在白内障患者中测量结果的有效性。
Optom Vis Sci. 2019 Oct;96(10):745-750. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001433.
8
Efficiency and measurements agreement between swept-source OCT and low-coherence interferometry biometry systems.扫频源光学相干断层扫描与低相干干涉测量生物测量系统之间的效率及测量一致性
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 Mar;256(3):559-566. doi: 10.1007/s00417-018-3909-9. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
9
Comparison of two swept-source optical coherence tomography biometers and a partial coherence interferometer.两种扫频源光相干断层生物测量仪和部分相干干涉仪的比较。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 11;14(10):e0223114. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223114. eCollection 2019.
10
Repeatability and Agreement of a Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography-Based Biometer IOLMaster 700 Versus a Scheimpflug Imaging-Based Biometer AL-Scan in Cataract Patients.基于扫频源光学相干生物测量仪 IOLMaster 700 与基于 Scheimpflug 成像的生物测量仪 AL-Scan 在白内障患者中的重复性和一致性。
Eye Contact Lens. 2020 Jan;46(1):35-45. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000603.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the interchangeability of keratometry measurements from four biometric devices in intraocular lens power calculations: insights into the predictive accuracy of five modern IOL formulas.评估四种生物测量设备的角膜曲率测量值在人工晶状体屈光力计算中的互换性:对五种现代人工晶状体公式预测准确性的见解。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2025 Apr 22;25(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s12886-025-04067-y.
2
Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Cataract Surgery: A Review.人工智能在白内障手术中的应用:综述
Clin Ophthalmol. 2024 Oct 17;18:2969-2975. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S489054. eCollection 2024.
3
Repeatability and agreement of two swept-source optical coherence tomographers and scheimpflug imaging for measurements of corneal curvature.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of 2 swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometry devices.两款基于扫频源光学相干断层扫描技术的生物测量设备的比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021 Jan 1;47(1):87-92. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000373.
2
Repeatability of whole-cornea measurements using a new swept-source optical coherence tomographer.使用新型扫频源光相干断层扫描仪测量全角膜的重复性。
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2021 Jul;31(4):1709-1719. doi: 10.1177/1120672120944022. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
3
Comparison of anterior segment measurements obtained by different swept-source OCT-based biometers.
两种扫频源光学相干断层扫描仪和Scheimpflug 成像测量角膜曲率的重复性和一致性。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2024 Oct 7;24(1):439. doi: 10.1186/s12886-024-03696-z.
4
Innovations and Outcomes in Astigmatism Correction During Cataract Surgery: A Comprehensive Review.白内障手术中散光矫正的创新与成果:全面综述
Cureus. 2024 Aug 26;16(8):e67828. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67828. eCollection 2024 Aug.
5
An Analysis of Ocular Biometrics: A Comprehensive Retrospective Study in a Large Cohort of Pediatric Cataract Patients.眼部生物特征分析:一项针对大量儿科白内障患者队列的综合回顾性研究。
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 15;13(16):4810. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164810.
6
Comparison of ocular biometric parameters between two swept-source optical coherence tomography devices and Scheimpflug tomography in patients with cataract.白内障患者中两种扫频源光学相干断层扫描设备与Scheimpflug断层扫描术的眼部生物测量参数比较
Int J Ophthalmol. 2024 Aug 18;17(8):1437-1446. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2024.08.08. eCollection 2024.
7
Comparison of axial length and anterior segment parameters of patients with myopia measured using 2 fourier-domain optical coherent biometry devices.使用两种傅里叶域光学相干生物测量设备测量的近视患者眼轴长度和眼前节参数的比较。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2024 Jul 16;24(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s12886-024-03546-y.
8
Comparison of two swept-source optical coherence tomography devices, a Scheimpflug camera system and a ray-tracing aberrometer in the measurement of corneal power in patients with cataract.比较两种扫频源光学相干断层扫描仪、Scheimpflug 相机系统和光线追踪像差仪在白内障患者角膜屈光力测量中的应用。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2024 May;262(5):1567-1578. doi: 10.1007/s00417-023-06348-y. Epub 2023 Dec 27.
9
Optimization of biometry for best refractive outcome in cataract surgery.白内障手术中生物测量的优化以达到最佳屈光效果。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2024 Jan 1;72(1):29-43. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_1219_23. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
10
Repeatability and Interobserver Reproducibility of a Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography for Measurements of Anterior, Posterior, and Total Corneal Power.扫频源光学相干断层扫描测量角膜前表面、后表面及总角膜屈光力的可重复性和观察者间再现性
Ophthalmol Ther. 2023 Dec;12(6):3263-3279. doi: 10.1007/s40123-023-00815-9. Epub 2023 Oct 3.
基于扫频源光学相干断层扫描的不同生物测量仪所获得的眼前节测量值的比较。
Can J Ophthalmol. 2020 Oct;55(5):e165-e168. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2020.03.008. Epub 2020 May 13.
4
Total keratometry in intraocular lens power calculations in eyes with previous laser refractive surgery.既往接受过激光屈光手术的眼睛在人工晶状体屈光力计算中的总角膜曲率测量
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020 Aug;48(6):749-756. doi: 10.1111/ceo.13760. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
5
Reproducibility, and repeatability of corneal topography measured by Revo NX, Galilei G6 and Casia 2 in normal eyes.Revo NX、Galilei G6 和 Casia 2 测量正常眼角膜地形图的可重复性和可重复性。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 2;15(4):e0230589. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230589. eCollection 2020.
6
Agreement of ocular biometric measurements in young healthy eyes between IOLMaster 700 and OA-2000.IOLMaster 700 与 OA-2000 在年轻健康眼中测量眼生物参数的一致性。
Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 21;10(1):3134. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-59919-y.
7
Comparison of a New Swept-Source Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography and a Scheimpflug Camera for Measurement of Corneal Curvature.新型扫频源眼前节光学相干断层扫描与Scheimpflug 相机测量角膜曲率的比较。
Cornea. 2020 Jul;39(7):818-822. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002280.
8
Comparison of anterior segment and lens biometric measurements in patients with cataract.白内障患者前节和晶状体生物测量的比较。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020 Jan;258(1):137-146. doi: 10.1007/s00417-019-04482-0. Epub 2019 Oct 20.
9
Comparison of two swept-source optical coherence tomography biometers and a partial coherence interferometer.两种扫频源光相干断层生物测量仪和部分相干干涉仪的比较。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 11;14(10):e0223114. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223114. eCollection 2019.
10
Comparison of refractive outcomes using conventional keratometry or total keratometry for IOL power calculation in cataract surgery.比较白内障手术中使用常规角膜曲率计或总角膜曲率计进行 IOL 屈光力计算的屈光效果。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019 Dec;257(12):2677-2682. doi: 10.1007/s00417-019-04443-7. Epub 2019 Sep 5.