• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估量表或输出格式:时间偏好逆转背后的注意力机制。

Evaluation Scale or Output Format: The Attentional Mechanism Underpinning Time Preference Reversal.

作者信息

Zhou Yan-Bang, Li Qiang, Li Qiu-Yue, Liu Hong-Zhi

机构信息

Department of Social Psychology, Zhou Enlai School of Government, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.

Laboratory of Behavioral Economics and Policy Simulation, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 14;13:865598. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.865598. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.865598
PMID:35496199
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9046692/
Abstract

Time preference reversals refers to systematic inconsistencies between preferences and valuations in intertemporal choice. When faced with a pair of intertemporal options, people preferred the smaller-sooner option but assign a higher price to the larger-later one. Different hypotheses postulate that the differences in evaluation scale or output format between the choice and the bid tasks cause the preference reversal. However, these hypotheses have not been distinguished. In the present study, we conducted a hybrid task, which shares the same evaluation scale with the bid task and shares the same output format with the choice task. By comparing these three tasks, we can figure out the key reason for time preference reversal. The eye-tracking measures reflecting attention allocation, cognitive effort and information search pattern were examined. Results showed that participants' time preference and eye-tracking measures in the hybrid task were similar to those in the choice task, but different from those in the bid task. Our findings suggest that the output format is the core reason for time preference reversal and may deepen our understanding of the mechanisms that underlie time preference reversal.

摘要

时间偏好逆转是指跨期选择中偏好与估值之间的系统性不一致。当面对一对跨期选项时,人们更喜欢较小且较早的选项,但却为较大且较晚的选项赋予更高的价格。不同的假设认为,选择任务和出价任务之间评估尺度或输出格式的差异导致了偏好逆转。然而,这些假设尚未得到区分。在本研究中,我们进行了一项混合任务,它与出价任务具有相同的评估尺度,与选择任务具有相同的输出格式。通过比较这三个任务,我们可以找出时间偏好逆转的关键原因。我们考察了反映注意力分配、认知努力和信息搜索模式的眼动测量指标。结果表明,参与者在混合任务中的时间偏好和眼动测量指标与选择任务中的相似,但与出价任务中的不同。我们的研究结果表明,输出格式是时间偏好逆转的核心原因,可能会加深我们对时间偏好逆转潜在机制的理解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e2ee/9046692/ce2f358c23da/fpsyg-13-865598-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e2ee/9046692/0c090b8cf588/fpsyg-13-865598-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e2ee/9046692/291ffa65487c/fpsyg-13-865598-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e2ee/9046692/ce2f358c23da/fpsyg-13-865598-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e2ee/9046692/0c090b8cf588/fpsyg-13-865598-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e2ee/9046692/291ffa65487c/fpsyg-13-865598-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e2ee/9046692/ce2f358c23da/fpsyg-13-865598-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation Scale or Output Format: The Attentional Mechanism Underpinning Time Preference Reversal.评估量表或输出格式:时间偏好逆转背后的注意力机制。
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 14;13:865598. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.865598. eCollection 2022.
2
The effect of risk on intertemporal choice and preference reversal.风险对跨期选择和偏好逆转的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2022 Mar;117(2):151-166. doi: 10.1002/jeab.732. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
3
Reassessing intertemporal choice: human decision-making is more optimal in a foraging task than in a self-control task.重新评估跨期选择:人类在觅食任务中的决策比在自我控制任务中更具优化性。
Front Psychol. 2015 Feb 6;6:95. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00095. eCollection 2015.
4
Delay Discounting and Preference Reversals by Cigarette Smokers.吸烟者的延迟折扣与偏好逆转
Psychol Rec. 2016 Jun 1;66(2):235-242. doi: 10.1007/s40732-016-0165-4. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
5
Preference Reversals in Decision Making Under Risk are Accompanied by Changes in Attention to Different Attributes.风险决策中的偏好反转伴随着对不同属性关注度的变化。
Front Neurosci. 2012 Jul 19;6:109. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2012.00109. eCollection 2012.
6
Waiting by mistake: symbolic representation of rewards modulates intertemporal choice in capuchin monkeys, preschool children and adult humans.错误等待:奖励的符号表征调节卷尾猴、学龄前儿童和成年人的跨期选择。
Cognition. 2014 Mar;130(3):428-41. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.11.019. Epub 2013 Dec 31.
7
Uncommitted Commitment: Behavioral Strategy to Prevent Preference Reversals.无承诺的承诺:防止偏好逆转的行为策略。
Perspect Behav Sci. 2019 Oct 28;43(1):105-114. doi: 10.1007/s40614-019-00229-8. eCollection 2020 Mar.
8
Characterization of performance on an automated visual recognition memory task in 7.5-month-old infants.7.5 个月大婴儿在自动化视觉识别记忆任务中的表现特征。
Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2020 Sep-Oct;81:106904. doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2020.106904. Epub 2020 May 30.
9
Easier comparison of bets in evaluation does not reduce classical preference reversals: Evidence against a context-dependent explanation.评估中的押注更容易进行比较并不会减少经典偏好反转:反对上下文相关解释的证据。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 3;19(1):e0292011. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292011. eCollection 2024.
10
Comparison of three different eye-tracking tasks for distinguishing autistic from typically developing children and autistic symptom severity.比较三种不同的眼动追踪任务,以区分自闭症儿童和典型发育儿童以及自闭症症状严重程度。
Autism Res. 2019 Oct;12(10):1529-1540. doi: 10.1002/aur.2174. Epub 2019 Aug 1.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of inequality on social value orientation: an eye-tracking study.不平等对社会价值取向的影响:一项眼动追踪研究。
Front Psychol. 2025 Feb 28;16:1521101. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1521101. eCollection 2025.
2
Preference reversal in intertemporal decision making.跨期决策中的偏好反转
Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 4;15:1423615. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1423615. eCollection 2024.
3
Time pressure effects on decision-making in intertemporal loss scenarios: an eye-tracking study.时间压力对跨期损失情景下决策的影响:一项眼动追踪研究。

本文引用的文献

1
Influence of the Manner of Information Presentation on Risky Choice.信息呈现方式对风险选择的影响。
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 25;12:650206. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.650206. eCollection 2021.
2
Amount and time exert independent influences on intertemporal choice.数量和时间对跨期选择有独立的影响。
Nat Hum Behav. 2019 Apr;3(4):383-392. doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0537-2. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
3
The consistency of visual attention to losses and loss sensitivity across valuation and choice.对损失的视觉注意力的一致性和损失敏感性在估值和选择中。
Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 11;15:1451674. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1451674. eCollection 2024.
4
The effect of incentives on intertemporal choice: Choice, confidence, and eye movements.激励对跨期选择的影响:选择、信心与眼动
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 3;13:989511. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.989511. eCollection 2022.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018 Dec;147(12):1791-1809. doi: 10.1037/xge0000524.
4
Pain now or later: an outgrowth account of pain-minimization.当下之痛还是日后之痛:疼痛最小化的衍生阐释
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 6;10(3):e0119320. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119320. eCollection 2015.
5
Attention in risky choice.风险选择中的注意力。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 Oct;152:166-76. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.08.008. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
6
Testing process predictions of models of risky choice: a quantitative model comparison approach.测试风险选择模型的预测过程:一种定量模型比较方法。
Front Psychol. 2013 Sep 27;4:646. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00646. eCollection 2013.
7
Is making a risky choice based on a weighting and adding process? An eye-tracking investigation.基于权衡和加总过程做出风险决策?一项眼动追踪研究。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Nov;39(6):1765-80. doi: 10.1037/a0032861. Epub 2013 May 20.
8
Preference Reversals in Decision Making Under Risk are Accompanied by Changes in Attention to Different Attributes.风险决策中的偏好反转伴随着对不同属性关注度的变化。
Front Neurosci. 2012 Jul 19;6:109. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2012.00109. eCollection 2012.
9
Treating stimuli as a random factor in social psychology: a new and comprehensive solution to a pervasive but largely ignored problem.将刺激物视为社会心理学中的随机因素:一种新的、全面的解决方案,可解决普遍存在但在很大程度上被忽视的问题。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Jul;103(1):54-69. doi: 10.1037/a0028347. Epub 2012 May 21.
10
The psychology of intertemporal tradeoffs.跨期权衡的心理学。
Psychol Rev. 2010 Jul;117(3):925-44. doi: 10.1037/a0019619.