• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

连续新发传染病疫情期间的生育趋势:巴西的寨卡病毒和 COVID-19。

Fertility trends during successive novel infectious disease outbreaks: Zika and COVID-19 in Brazil.

机构信息

University of Texas at Austin, Austin, U.S.A.

Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, Brasil.

出版信息

Cad Saude Publica. 2022 Apr 29;38(4):EN230621. doi: 10.1590/0102-311XEN230621. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1590/0102-311XEN230621
PMID:35508025
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9744098/
Abstract

This study aims to estimate fertility trends in Brazil in the 2010s and early 2020s during a period of back-to-back novel infectious disease outbreaks - Zika virus and COVID-19. We use Brazilian Ministry of Health and Association of Civil Registrar data from 2011-2021 to measure general fertility rates at the national and state levels. We also used seasonal ARIMA model to forecast fertility rates by month and state in 2021 and compared these forecasts with observed fertility rates. We find that fertility rates were steady over 2011-2015 with no statistically significant variation, followed by a sharp decline during the Zika outbreak in 2016 followed by a return to pre-Zika levels after the end of the epidemic. Furthermore, to evaluate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic, we make comparisons with observed and forecast rates from 2020-2021, showing that declines were generally larger for observed than for forecast rates, yet statistically insignificant. We argue that the resurgence of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2021 might lead to further declines, as women might have not had enough time to adjust rebound from either the effects of the Zika epidemic. We also discuss the importance of timely availability of live births data during a public health crisis with immediate consequences for fertility rates.

摘要

这项研究旨在估计 21 世纪 10 年代和 2020 年代初期巴西的生育趋势,这一时期接连爆发了新型传染病——寨卡病毒和 COVID-19。我们使用巴西卫生部和民事登记协会的数据,从 2011 年至 2021 年,在国家和州两级衡量一般生育率。我们还使用季节性 ARIMA 模型按月和按州预测 2021 年的生育率,并将这些预测与实际生育率进行比较。我们发现,2011 年至 2015 年期间,生育率保持稳定,没有明显的变化,随后在寨卡病毒爆发期间急剧下降,疫情结束后恢复到寨卡病毒爆发前的水平。此外,为了评估 COVID-19 大流行的影响,我们将 2020 年至 2021 年的实际和预测生育率进行比较,结果表明,实际生育率的降幅通常大于预测生育率,但没有统计学意义。我们认为,2021 年 COVID-19 疫情的再次爆发可能导致进一步下降,因为女性可能还没有足够的时间从寨卡疫情的影响中恢复过来。我们还讨论了在公共卫生危机期间及时获得活产数据的重要性,因为这对生育率有直接影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d8e/9744098/f55326af8474/nihms-1845666-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d8e/9744098/427436de06bc/nihms-1845666-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d8e/9744098/64c1810c0c0b/nihms-1845666-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d8e/9744098/f55326af8474/nihms-1845666-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d8e/9744098/427436de06bc/nihms-1845666-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d8e/9744098/64c1810c0c0b/nihms-1845666-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d8e/9744098/f55326af8474/nihms-1845666-f0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Fertility trends during successive novel infectious disease outbreaks: Zika and COVID-19 in Brazil.连续新发传染病疫情期间的生育趋势:巴西的寨卡病毒和 COVID-19。
Cad Saude Publica. 2022 Apr 29;38(4):EN230621. doi: 10.1590/0102-311XEN230621. eCollection 2022.
2
Live Births and Fertility Amid the Zika Epidemic in Brazil.巴西寨卡疫情中的活产和生育率。
Demography. 2020 Jun;57(3):843-872. doi: 10.1007/s13524-020-00871-x.
3
Infection-related microcephaly after the 2015 and 2016 Zika virus outbreaks in Brazil: a surveillance-based analysis.巴西 2015 年和 2016 年寨卡病毒疫情后的感染相关小头畸形:基于监测的分析。
Lancet. 2017 Aug 26;390(10097):861-870. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31368-5. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
4
Climate and fertility amid a public health crisis.公共卫生危机下的气候与生育力
Popul Stud (Camb). 2023 Nov;77(3):437-458. doi: 10.1080/00324728.2023.2228288. Epub 2023 Aug 15.
5
Implications of Zika virus and congenital Zika syndrome for the number of live births in Brazil.寨卡病毒和先天性寨卡综合征对巴西活产儿数量的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jun 12;115(24):6177-6182. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1718476115. Epub 2018 May 29.
6
Trends of the microcephaly and Zika virus outbreak in Brazil, January-July 2016.2016 年 1 月至 7 月巴西小头畸形与寨卡病毒疫情趋势
Travel Med Infect Dis. 2016 Sep-Oct;14(5):458-463. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2016.09.006. Epub 2016 Oct 1.
7
Simple framework for real-time forecast in a data-limited situation: the Zika virus (ZIKV) outbreaks in Brazil from 2015 to 2016 as an example.简单的实时预测框架:以 2015 年至 2016 年巴西寨卡病毒(ZIKV)疫情爆发为例。
Parasit Vectors. 2019 Jul 12;12(1):344. doi: 10.1186/s13071-019-3602-9.
8
Health and Development at Age 19-24 Months of 19 Children Who Were Born with Microcephaly and Laboratory Evidence of Congenital Zika Virus Infection During the 2015 Zika Virus Outbreak - Brazil, 2017.2017年巴西,19名在2015年寨卡病毒疫情期间出生时患有小头畸形且有先天性寨卡病毒感染实验室证据的儿童在19至24个月大时的健康与发育情况。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017 Dec 15;66(49):1347-1351. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6649a2.
9
Zika Virus after the Public Health Emergency of International Concern Period, Brazil.寨卡病毒国际关注公共卫生突发事件时期后的巴西。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2022 Apr;28(4):837-840. doi: 10.3201/eid2804.211949.
10
High Zika Virus Seroprevalence in Salvador, Northeastern Brazil Limits the Potential for Further Outbreaks.巴西东北部萨尔瓦多市寨卡病毒血清阳性率高,限制了进一步爆发的潜力。
mBio. 2017 Nov 14;8(6):e01390-17. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01390-17.

引用本文的文献

1
Maternal and late mortality trends, emphasizing the H1N1 and COVID-19 pandemics, in the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, from 2009 to 2021.2009年至2021年巴西里约热内卢州孕产妇和晚期死亡率趋势,重点关注甲型H1N1流感和新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情。
Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2025 Jul 21;28:e250037. doi: 10.1590/1980-549720250037. eCollection 2025.
2
Live births and deaths of neonates born to adolescent mothers: analysis of trends and associations from a population study in a region of a middle-income country.青春期母亲所生新生儿的活产和死亡情况:来自一个中等收入国家某地区人群研究的趋势及关联分析
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Feb 19;25(1):184. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07202-1.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Navigating women's reproductive health and childbearing during public health crises: Covid-19 and Zika in Brazil.在公共卫生危机期间应对巴西女性的生殖健康与生育问题:新冠疫情与寨卡病毒病
World Dev. 2021 Mar;139. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105305. Epub 2020 Dec 4.
2
Reduction in life expectancy in Brazil after COVID-19.巴西在经历了新冠疫情后预期寿命缩短。
Nat Med. 2021 Sep;27(9):1629-1635. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01437-z. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
3
Maternal and Neonatal Morbidity and Mortality Among Pregnant Women With and Without COVID-19 Infection: The INTERCOVID Multinational Cohort Study.
Temporal analysis of mortality from preventable causes in the first 24 hours of life, 2000-2021.
2000-2021 年生命最初 24 小时内可预防死因的时间分析。
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2023 Dec 4;31:e4079. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.6696.4079. eCollection 2023.
4
The relationship between staying at home during the pandemic and the number of conceptions: A national panel data analysis.疫情期间居家与受孕数量之间的关系:一项全国面板数据分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 11;18(8):e0289604. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289604. eCollection 2023.
孕妇合并与不合并 COVID-19 感染的母婴发病率和死亡率:INTERCOVID 多国队列研究。
JAMA Pediatr. 2021 Aug 1;175(8):817-826. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.1050.
4
Spatiotemporal pattern of COVID-19 spread in Brazil.巴西 COVID-19 传播的时空模式。
Science. 2021 May 21;372(6544):821-826. doi: 10.1126/science.abh1558. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
5
Change in the Incidence of Stillbirth and Preterm Delivery During the COVID-19 Pandemic.2019年冠状病毒病大流行期间死产和早产发生率的变化
JAMA. 2020 Jul 10;324(7):705-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.12746.
6
Deaths due to COVID-19 in Brazil: how many are there and which are being identified?巴西因新冠病毒病死亡的人数:有多少以及哪些正在被确认?
Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2020 Jun 22;23:e200053. doi: 10.1590/1980-549720200053. eCollection 2020.
7
Live Births and Fertility Amid the Zika Epidemic in Brazil.巴西寨卡疫情中的活产和生育率。
Demography. 2020 Jun;57(3):843-872. doi: 10.1007/s13524-020-00871-x.
8
Zika-Associated Microcephaly Epidemic and Birth Rate Reduction in Brazilian Cities.巴西城市中寨卡病毒相关小头症流行与出生率下降。
Am J Public Health. 2018 Apr;108(4):514-516. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.304260. Epub 2018 Feb 22.