Department of Pharmaceutics, Dr. D.Y. Patil Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra 411018, India.
Department of Pharmacology, Dr. D.Y. Patil Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra 411018, India.
ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2022 Jun 13;8(6):2161-2195. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c01304. Epub 2022 May 6.
In recent decades there has been growing interest of material chemists in the successful development of functional materials for drug delivery, tissue engineering, imaging, diagnosis, theranostic, and other biomedical applications with advanced nanotechnology tools. The efficacy and safety of functional materials are determined by their pharmacological, toxicological, and immunogenic effects. It is essential to consider all degradation pathways of functional materials and to assess plausible intermediates and final products for quality control. This review provides a brief insight into chemical degradation mechanisms of functional materials like oxidation, photodegradation, and physical and enzymatic degradation. The intermediates and products of degradation were confirmed with analytical methods such as proton nuclear magnetic resonance (H NMR), gel permeation chromatography (GPC), UV-vis spectroscopy (UV-vis), infrared spectroscopy (IR), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), mass spectroscopy, and other sophisticated analytical methods. These analytical methods are also used for regulatory, quality control, and stability purposes in industry. The assessment of degradation is important to predetermine the behavior of functional materials in specific storage conditions and can be relevant to their behavior during in vivo applications. Another important aspect is the evaluation of the toxicity of functional materials. Toxicity can be accessed with various methods using in vitro, in vivo, ex vivo, and in silico models. In vitro cell culture methods are used to determine mitochondrial damage, reactive oxygen species, stress responses, and cellular toxicity. In vitro cellular toxicity can be measured by MTT assay, LDH leakage assay, and hemolysis. In vivo studies are performed using various animal models involving zebrafish, rodents (mice and rats), and nonhuman primates. Ex vivo studies are also used for efficacy and toxicity determinations of functional materials like ex vivo potency assay and precision-cut liver slice (PCLS) models. The in silico tools with computational simulations like quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR), pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD), dose and time response, and quantitative cationic-activity relationships ((Q)CARs) are used for prediction of the toxicity of functional materials. In this review, we studied the principle methods used for degradation studies, different degradation pathways, and mechanisms of functional material degradation with prototype examples. We discuss toxicity assessments with different toxicity approaches used for estimation of the safety and efficacy of functional materials.
近几十年来,材料化学家对使用先进的纳米技术工具为药物输送、组织工程、成像、诊断、治疗和其他生物医学应用开发功能性材料越来越感兴趣。功能性材料的疗效和安全性取决于其药理学、毒理学和免疫原性。考虑所有功能性材料的降解途径,并评估质量控制的可能中间体和最终产物是至关重要的。
本综述简要介绍了功能性材料的化学降解机制,如氧化、光降解以及物理和酶降解。使用质子核磁共振(1H NMR)、凝胶渗透色谱(GPC)、紫外-可见光谱(UV-vis)、红外光谱(IR)、差示扫描量热法(DSC)、质谱等分析方法对降解中间体和产物进行了确认。以及其他复杂的分析方法。这些分析方法也用于工业中的监管、质量控制和稳定性目的。
降解评估对于预先确定特定储存条件下功能性材料的行为非常重要,并且可能与其体内应用中的行为相关。另一个重要方面是评估功能性材料的毒性。可以使用各种方法(包括体外、体内、离体和计算模型)来评估毒性。
体外细胞培养方法用于测定线粒体损伤、活性氧、应激反应和细胞毒性。MTT 测定法、LDH 漏出测定法和溶血可用于测量体外细胞毒性。体内研究使用涉及斑马鱼、啮齿动物(小鼠和大鼠)和非人类灵长类动物的各种动物模型进行。离体研究也用于功能性材料的功效和毒性测定,如离体效力测定和精密切割肝切片(PCLS)模型。使用计算模拟的计算工具,如定量构效关系(QSAR)、药代动力学(PK)和药效动力学(PD)、剂量和时间反应以及定量阳离子活性关系(QCAR),用于预测功能性材料的毒性。
在本综述中,我们研究了用于降解研究的主要方法、不同的降解途径以及功能性材料降解的机制,并以原型示例进行了讨论。我们讨论了不同的毒性评估方法,用于估计功能性材料的安全性和功效。