• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

互动培训提高健康素养知识、行为和信心。

Improving Health Literacy Knowledge, Behaviors, and Confidence with Interactive Training.

出版信息

Health Lit Res Pract. 2022 Apr;6(2):e113-e120. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20220420-01. Epub 2022 May 6.

DOI:10.3928/24748307-20220420-01
PMID:35522855
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9126053/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ensuring that health care professionals are knowledgeable about the influence limited health literacy has on health outcomes and how to apply health literate strategies is crucial to transform quality and safety in care settings. Although many organizational efforts to address health literacy have focused on hospital settings, few have focused on primary care. The designation of a patient-centered medical home requires the need to address integrating health literacy and the training needs of primary care settings. Brief description of activity: An interactive health literacy training intervention was developed, implemented, and evaluated for 25 primary care clinics. This included an online educational module, in-person application activities, and a sustainability plan to continue skill building, reinforce behaviors, and support practice.

IMPLEMENTATION

Using a descriptive pre- and post-training design, three survey measures were used to rate health literacy knowledge, behaviors, and confidence levels of more than 475 primary care staff. A pre-training survey was completed prior to completion of an interactive online health literacy module and attendance at an in-person training session which followed. A post-training survey was then completed. Sustainment activities, including lunch and learns, and reinforcement activities by clinic leaders, were initiated to promote use of the strategies in practice. A 1-year follow-up survey was then administered to measure sustainability.

RESULTS

The interactive training intervention improved primary care staff's knowledge, behaviors, and confidence in using health literacy strategies with patients and families. Common barriers and facilitators around the use of these strategies were also identified.

LESSONS LEARNED

Careful consideration should be taken when developing health literacy training to ensure it will be effective, efficient, and sustainable. Using elements that facilitate the transfer of training to practice will help improve success. Addressing barriers and promoting facilitators, as well as integrating and connecting health literacy strategies with existing organizational goals and initiatives offer additional ways to reinforce and sustain the practice change. Plain Language Summary: Clinic staff can improve how they provide information and education to children and families. Interactive training about health literacy led clinic staff to (1) know more about health literacy, (2) use health literacy strategies more, and (3) feel more confident using health literacy strategies. Training over time, supporting staff, and connecting to organizational goals are important for sustainment.

摘要

背景

确保医疗保健专业人员了解有限的健康素养对健康结果的影响,以及如何应用健康素养策略,对于改善医疗保健环境中的质量和安全至关重要。尽管许多旨在解决健康素养问题的组织工作都集中在医院环境中,但很少关注初级保健。以患者为中心的医疗之家的指定要求解决整合健康素养和初级保健环境的培训需求。简要描述活动:为 25 家初级保健诊所开发、实施和评估了一项互动式健康素养培训干预措施。这包括一个在线教育模块、面对面的应用活动以及一个可持续性计划,以继续进行技能建设、强化行为和支持实践。

实施情况

使用描述性的培训前和培训后设计,使用了三种调查措施来评估 475 多名初级保健人员的健康素养知识、行为和信心水平。在完成互动式在线健康素养模块并参加随后的现场培训课程之前,完成了培训前调查。然后完成了培训后调查。为了促进在实践中使用这些策略,启动了包括午餐和学习以及诊所领导的强化活动等持续活动。然后进行了为期一年的随访调查,以衡量可持续性。

结果

互动培训干预措施提高了初级保健人员在与患者和家属一起使用健康素养策略方面的知识、行为和信心。还确定了使用这些策略的常见障碍和促进因素。

经验教训

在开发健康素养培训时,应仔细考虑确保其有效性、高效性和可持续性。使用有助于培训向实践转移的要素将有助于提高成功率。解决障碍和促进因素,以及将健康素养策略与现有组织目标和计划相结合,提供了加强和维持实践变革的其他方法。

简体中文译文

诊所工作人员可以提高向儿童和家庭提供信息和教育的能力。关于健康素养的互动培训使诊所工作人员(1)更多地了解健康素养,(2)更多地使用健康素养策略,以及(3)更有信心使用健康素养策略。随着时间的推移进行培训、支持员工并与组织目标保持联系对于维持工作至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9734/9126053/670b878af385/10.3928_24748307-20220420-01-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9734/9126053/bc32ef7e01b6/10.3928_24748307-20220420-01-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9734/9126053/670b878af385/10.3928_24748307-20220420-01-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9734/9126053/bc32ef7e01b6/10.3928_24748307-20220420-01-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9734/9126053/670b878af385/10.3928_24748307-20220420-01-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Improving Health Literacy Knowledge, Behaviors, and Confidence with Interactive Training.互动培训提高健康素养知识、行为和信心。
Health Lit Res Pract. 2022 Apr;6(2):e113-e120. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20220420-01. Epub 2022 May 6.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
4
Structured, intensive education maximising engagement, motivation and long-term change for children and young people with diabetes: a cluster randomised controlled trial with integral process and economic evaluation - the CASCADE study.结构化、强化教育最大限度地提高糖尿病患儿和青少年的参与度、积极性和长期改变:一项具有整体过程和经济评估的群组随机对照试验 - CASCADE 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Mar;18(20):1-202. doi: 10.3310/hta18200.
5
Assessing Teach-Back Utilization in a Downtown Medical Center.评估市中心医疗中心的回授教学利用率。
Health Lit Res Pract. 2021 Jul;5(3):e226-e232. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20210719-01. Epub 2021 Aug 7.
6
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
7
Delivering an iterative Communication Partner Training programme to multidisciplinary healthcare professionals: A pilot implementation study and process evaluation.为多学科医疗保健专业人员提供迭代沟通伙伴培训计划:试点实施研究和过程评估。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2021 May;56(3):620-636. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12618. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
8
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
9
10

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating ChatGPT's Accuracy and Readability in Responding to Common Ophthalmology Questions.评估ChatGPT在回答常见眼科问题时的准确性和可读性。
Cureus. 2025 Jul 14;17(7):e87920. doi: 10.7759/cureus.87920. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Effects of a Theory- and Evidence-Based, Motivational Interviewing-Oriented Artificial Intelligence Digital Assistant on Vaccine Attitudes: A Randomized Controlled Trial.基于理论和证据的、以动机性访谈为导向的人工智能数字助手对疫苗态度的影响:一项随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 8;27:e72637. doi: 10.2196/72637.
3
Nutritional Literacy for Individual Oral Health Among Village Health Volunteers in Public Health Region 1 of Thailand.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-term Effects of a Health Literacy Curriculum for Family Medicine Residents.针对家庭医学住院医师的健康素养课程的长期效果
PRiMER. 2017 Dec 6;1:22. doi: 10.22454/PRiMER.2017.703541. eCollection 2017 Sep.
2
Positive Outcomes of a Comprehensive Health Literacy Communication Training for Health Professionals in Three European Countries: A Multi-centre Pre-post Intervention Study.三项欧洲国家健康专业人员综合健康素养沟通培训的积极成果:一项多中心前后干预研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Oct 15;16(20):3923. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16203923.
3
Prioritized Health Literacy and Clear Communication Practices For Health Care Professionals.
泰国第一公共卫生区域乡村健康志愿者的个人口腔健康营养素养
Health Care Sci. 2025 Feb 16;4(1):25-34. doi: 10.1002/hcs2.131. eCollection 2025 Feb.
4
Communicate to Care: Implementing Health Literacy in a Pediatric Ears, Nose, and Throat Clinic.沟通关怀:在儿科耳鼻喉科诊所实施健康素养。
Health Lit Res Pract. 2024 Jul;8(3):e166-e174. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20240819-02. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
5
Become a Health Literacy Champion: Strategies to Promote Health Literacy in Athletic Training.成为健康素养倡导者:在运动训练中促进健康素养的策略。
J Athl Train. 2024 May 1;59(5):428-437. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-0390.23.
6
Electronic Health Literacy Among Baby Boomers: A Typology.婴儿潮一代的电子健康素养:一种类型学。
Health Lit Res Pract. 2024 Jan;8(1):e3-e11. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20231213-02. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
7
Identifying facilitators and barriers to culturally responsive communication for racial, ethnic, sexual, and gender minoritized patients when screened for COVID-19 vaccinations: A scoping review protocol.确定在为 COVID-19 疫苗接种筛查时针对少数族裔、种族、性别和性少数患者进行文化响应沟通的促进因素和障碍:范围综述方案。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 5;18(10):e0290514. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290514. eCollection 2023.
8
Predicted Health Literacy Disparities Between Immigrant and US-Born Racial/Ethnic Minorities: a Nationwide Study.预测移民和美国出生的少数族裔之间的健康素养差距:一项全国性研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Aug;38(10):2364-2373. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08082-x. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
医疗保健专业人员的优先健康素养与清晰沟通实践
Health Lit Res Pract. 2017 Jul 10;1(3):e91-e99. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20170503-01. eCollection 2017 Jul.
4
Health Literacy in the Inpatient Setting: Implications for Patient Care and Patient Safety.住院患者的健康素养:对患者护理和患者安全的影响。
Pediatr Clin North Am. 2019 Aug;66(4):805-826. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2019.03.007. Epub 2019 May 23.
5
Health Literacy: Implications for Child Health.健康素养:对儿童健康的影响
Pediatr Rev. 2019 Jun;40(6):263-277. doi: 10.1542/pir.2018-0027.
6
Continuing professional development to foster behaviour change: From principles to practice in health professions education.持续专业发展以促进行为改变:从健康专业教育的原则到实践。
Med Teach. 2019 Sep;41(9):1045-1052. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2019.1615608. Epub 2019 May 26.
7
Selecting, refining and identifying priority Cochrane Reviews in health communication and participation in partnership with consumers and other stakeholders.选择、精炼和确定与消费者及其他利益攸关方合作的健康传播领域中的优先 Cochrane 综述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Apr 29;17(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0444-z.
8
The Teach Back Project: A System-wide Evidence Based Practice Implementation.反馈教学项目:全系统基于证据的实践实施
J Pediatr Nurs. 2018 Sep-Oct;42:81-85. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2018.06.002. Epub 2018 Jul 21.
9
Implementation of a patient safety program at a tertiary health system: A longitudinal analysis of interventions and serious safety events.在三级医疗系统中实施患者安全计划:对干预措施和严重安全事件的纵向分析。
J Healthc Risk Manag. 2018 Apr;37(4):17-24. doi: 10.1002/jhrm.21319. Epub 2018 Mar 31.
10
Parental Management of Discharge Instructions: A Systematic Review.家长出院指导管理:系统评价。
Pediatrics. 2017 Aug;140(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-4165.