Abildgren Lotte, Lebahn-Hadidi Malte, Mogensen Christian Backer, Toft Palle, Nielsen Anders Bo, Frandsen Tove Faber, Steffensen Sune Vork, Hounsgaard Lise
Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Unit, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
OPEN, Open Patient data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital/Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Adv Simul (Lond). 2022 May 7;7(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s41077-022-00207-2.
Simulation-based training used to train healthcare teams' skills and improve clinical practice has evolved in recent decades. While it is evident that technical skills training is beneficial, the potential of human factor training has not been described to the same extent. Research on human factor training has been limited to marginal and acute care scenarios and often to validate instruments. This systematic review aimed to investigate the effectiveness of simulation-based training in improving in-hospital qualified healthcare teams' human factor skills.
A review protocol outlining the study was registered in PROSPERO. Using the PRISMA guidelines, the systematic search was conducted on September 28th, 2021, in eight major scientific databases. Three independent reviewers assessed title and abstract screening; full texts were evaluated by one reviewer. Content analysis was used to evaluate the evidence from the included studies.
The search yielded 19,767 studies, of which 72 were included. The included studies were published between 2004 and 2021 and covered research from seven different in-hospital medical specialisms. Studies applied a wide range of assessment tools, which made it challenging to compare the effectiveness of human factor skills training across studies. The content analysis identified evidence for the effectiveness. Four recurring themes were identified: (1) Training human factor skills in qualified healthcare teams; (2) assessment of human factor skills; (3) combined teaching methods, and (4) retention and transfer of human factor skills. Unfortunately, the human factor skills assessments are variable in the literature, affecting the power of the result.
Simulation-based training is a successful learning tool to improve qualified healthcare teams' human factor skills. Human factor skills are not innate and appear to be trainable similar to technical skills, based on the findings of this review. Moreover, research on retention and transfer is insufficient. Further, research on the retention and transfer of human factor skills from simulation-based training to clinical practice is essential to gain knowledge of the effect on patient safety.
近几十年来,用于培训医疗团队技能和改善临床实践的基于模拟的培训不断发展。虽然技术技能培训的益处显而易见,但人为因素培训的潜力尚未得到同样程度的描述。关于人为因素培训的研究仅限于边缘和急症护理场景,且通常是为了验证工具。本系统评价旨在调查基于模拟的培训在提高医院内合格医疗团队人为因素技能方面的有效性。
一份概述该研究的综述方案已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO)中登记。按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,于2021年9月28日在八个主要科学数据库中进行了系统检索。三位独立评审员评估标题和摘要筛选;全文由一位评审员评估。采用内容分析法评估纳入研究的证据。
检索共获得19767项研究,其中72项被纳入。纳入研究发表于2004年至2021年之间,涵盖了七个不同的医院内医学专科的研究。研究应用了广泛的评估工具,这使得跨研究比较人为因素技能培训的有效性具有挑战性。内容分析确定了有效性的证据。确定了四个反复出现的主题:(1)在合格医疗团队中培训人为因素技能;(2)人为因素技能评估;(3)综合教学方法,以及(4)人为因素技能的保持和迁移。不幸的是,文献中人为因素技能评估各不相同,影响了结果的说服力。
基于模拟的培训是提高合格医疗团队人为因素技能的成功学习工具。根据本综述的结果,人为因素技能不是天生的,似乎与技术技能一样可通过培训获得。此外,关于保持和迁移的研究不足。进一步研究基于模拟的培训中人为因素技能向临床实践的保持和迁移对于了解对患者安全的影响至关重要。