Suppr超能文献

孤独感在新冠疫情之前和期间的表现:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。

Loneliness before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz.

Department of Sports Medicine and Exercise Physiology, Institute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt.

出版信息

Am Psychol. 2022 Jul-Aug;77(5):660-677. doi: 10.1037/amp0001005. Epub 2022 May 9.

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic and measures aimed at its mitigation, such as physical distancing, have been discussed as risk factors for loneliness, which increases the risk of premature mortality and mental and physical health conditions. To ascertain whether loneliness has increased since the start of the pandemic, this study aimed to narratively and statistically synthesize relevant high-quality primary studies. This systematic review with meta-analysis was registered at PROSPERO (ID CRD42021246771). Searched databases were PubMed, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library/Central Register of Controlled Trials/EMBASE/CINAHL, Web of Science, the World Health Organization (WHO) COVID-19 database, supplemented by Google Scholar and citation searching (cutoff date of the systematic search December 5, 2021). Summary data from prospective research including loneliness assessments before and during the pandemic were extracted. Of 6,850 retrieved records, 34 studies (23 longitudinal, 9 pseudolongitudinal, 2 reporting both designs) on 215,026 participants were included. Risk of bias (RoB) was estimated using the risk of bias in non-randomised studies-of interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. Standardized mean differences (SMD, Hedges' g) for continuous loneliness values and logOR for loneliness prevalence rates were calculated as pooled effect size estimators in random-effects meta-analyses. Pooling studies with longitudinal designs only (overall N = 45,734), loneliness scores (19 studies, SMD = 0.27 [95% confidence interval = 0.14-0.40], Z = 4.02, p < .001, I 2 = 98%) and prevalence rates (8 studies, logOR = 0.33 [0.04-0.62], Z = 2.25, p = .02, I 2 = 96%) increased relative to prepandemic times with small effect sizes. Results were robust with respect to studies' overall RoB, pseudolongitudinal designs, timing of prepandemic assessments, and clinical populations. The heterogeneity of effects indicates a need to further investigate risk and protective factors as the pandemic progresses to inform targeted interventions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)大流行及其缓解措施,如保持身体距离,被认为是孤独的风险因素,孤独会增加过早死亡和身心健康状况的风险。为了确定自大流行开始以来孤独感是否增加,本研究旨在对相关高质量原始研究进行叙述性和统计学综合。本系统评价和荟萃分析已在 PROSPERO(注册号:CRD42021246771)注册。检索数据库包括 PubMed、PsycINFO、Cochrane 图书馆/对照试验注册中心/EMBASE/CINAHL、Web of Science、世界卫生组织(WHO)COVID-19 数据库,此外还通过 Google Scholar 和引文搜索(系统检索截止日期为 2021 年 12 月 5 日)进行补充。提取了包括大流行前和大流行期间孤独感评估的前瞻性研究的汇总数据。在 6850 篇检索记录中,纳入了 34 项研究(23 项纵向研究、9 项伪纵向研究、2 项报告了两种设计),涉及 215026 名参与者。使用非随机干预研究的偏倚风险(ROBINS-I)工具评估偏倚风险(RoB)。在随机效应荟萃分析中,使用连续孤独值的标准化均数差(SMD,Hedges'g)和孤独率的对数比值(logOR)计算汇总效应大小估计值。仅对具有纵向设计的研究进行汇总(总体 N=45734),孤独评分(19 项研究,SMD=0.27[95%置信区间=0.14-0.40],Z=4.02,p<.001,I 2=98%)和孤独率(8 项研究,logOR=0.33[0.04-0.62],Z=2.25,p=.02,I 2=96%)与大流行前时期相比有所增加,效应较小。研究的总体 RoB、伪纵向设计、大流行前评估的时间以及临床人群对结果均具有稳健性。效应的异质性表明,随着大流行的发展,需要进一步研究风险和保护因素,以便为有针对性的干预措施提供信息。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2022 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验