Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
J Hosp Med. 2022 Jun;17(6):456-465. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2777. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
Despite three decades of effort, ensuring inpatient safety remains elusive. Patients and family members are a potential source of safety observations, but systems gathering these are limited. Our goal was to test a system to gather safety observations from hospitalized patients and their family members via a real-time mobile health tool.
We developed a mobile-responsive website for reporting safety observations. We piloted the tool during June 2017-April 2018 on the medical-surgical unit of a children's hospital. Participants were English-speaking family members and patients ≥13 years. We sent a daily text with a website link. We assessed: (1) face validity by comparing observations to incident reporting (IR) criteria and to hospital IRs and (2) associations between the number of safety observations/100 patient-days and participant characteristics using Poisson regression.
We enrolled 235 patients (43.8% of 537 reviewed for eligibility), resulting in 8.15 safety reports/100 patient-days, most frequently regarding medications (29% of reports) and communication (20% of reports). Fifty-one (40% of 125) met IR criteria; only one (1.1%) had been reported via the IR system. Latinx participants submitted fewer observations than White participants (3.9 vs. 10.1, p = .002); participants with more prior hospitalizations submitted more observations (p < .001). In adjusted analyses, including measures of preference in decision making, and patient activation, the difference between Latinx and White participants diminished substantially (6.4 vs. 11.3, p = .16).
We demonstrated the feasibility of real-time patient and family-member technology-enabled safety observation reporting and elicited reports not otherwise identified. Variation in reporting may potentially exacerbate disparities in safety if not addressed.
尽管已经努力了三十年,但确保住院患者安全仍然难以实现。患者及其家属是安全观察的潜在来源,但收集这些信息的系统有限。我们的目标是测试一种通过实时移动健康工具从住院患者及其家属那里收集安全观察结果的系统。
我们开发了一个用于报告安全观察结果的移动响应式网站。我们在 2017 年 6 月至 2018 年 4 月期间在一家儿童医院的内科和外科病房试用了该工具。参与者为讲英语的家属和年龄≥13 岁的患者。我们每天都会发送一条包含网站链接的短信。我们评估了以下内容:(1)通过将观察结果与事件报告(IR)标准和医院的 IR 进行比较,评估其表面有效性;(2)使用泊松回归分析安全观察结果数量/100 患者日与参与者特征之间的关系。
我们共招募了 235 名患者(符合条件的 537 名患者中有 43.8%),结果报告了 8.15 份安全报告/100 患者日,最常见的是关于药物(占报告的 29%)和沟通(占报告的 20%)。51 份(125 份中的 40%)符合 IR 标准;只有 1 份(1.1%)通过 IR 系统报告。拉丁裔参与者提交的观察结果少于白人参与者(3.9 比 10.1,p=0.002);有更多住院经历的参与者提交了更多的观察结果(p<0.001)。在调整后的分析中,包括决策偏好和患者激活的衡量标准,拉丁裔和白人参与者之间的差异大大缩小(6.4 比 11.3,p=0.16)。
我们证明了实时患者和家属技术支持的安全观察报告的可行性,并征集了其他方式未发现的报告。如果不加以解决,报告中的差异可能会加剧安全方面的差异。