• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

住院儿童的儿科护理人员数字健康素养的差异:对数字健康公平性的影响。

Variations in digital health literacy for pediatric caregivers of hospitalized children: implications for digital health equity.

作者信息

Crook Steven, Rosenbluth Glenn, Glidden David V, Fernandez Alicia, Lee Chuan-Mei, Avina Lizette, Magana Leslie, Washington Kiana, Bardach Naomi S

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, United States.

Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, United States.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025 Mar 1;32(3):572-578. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae305.

DOI:10.1093/jamia/ocae305
PMID:39688734
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11833484/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We sought to assess whether race, ethnicity, and preferred language were associated with digital health literacy in pediatric caregivers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used linear regression to measure associations between 3 eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ) domains (score range: 1-4) and demographic characteristics.

RESULTS

Non-Latinx White respondents (n = 230) had highest adjusted mean eHLQ scores: 3.44 (95% confidence interval: 3.36-3.52) in "Ability to engage," 3.39 (3.31 to 3.47) in "Feel safe and in control," and 3.34 (3.25 to 3.41) in "Motivated." By contrast, Spanish-preferring Latinx respondents (n = 246) had lower adjusted mean scores across all 3 eHLQ domains: 2.97 (P < .0001), 3.21 (P = .004), and 3.19 (P = .033), respectively.

DISCUSSION

Our study contributes insights in variations across ethnoracial and language preference groups by different eHLQ domains, with implications for addressing digital health inequities.

CONCLUSION

Digital health literacy was lower in Spanish-preferring Latinx pediatric caregivers compared to non-Latinx White caregivers across 3 eHLQ domains. It was lower than English-preferring Latinx caregivers in "Ability."

摘要

目的

我们试图评估种族、族裔和偏好语言是否与儿科护理人员的数字健康素养相关。

材料与方法

我们使用线性回归来衡量3个电子健康素养问卷(eHLQ)领域(得分范围:1 - 4)与人口统计学特征之间的关联。

结果

非拉丁裔白人受访者(n = 230)在调整后的eHLQ平均得分最高:“参与能力”领域为3.44(95%置信区间:3.36 - 3.52),“感到安全和掌控”领域为3.39(3.31至3.47),“有动力”领域为3.34(3.25至3.41)。相比之下,偏好西班牙语的拉丁裔受访者(n = 246)在所有3个eHLQ领域的调整后平均得分较低:分别为2.97(P <.0001)、3.21(P =.004)和3.19(P =.033)。

讨论

我们的研究揭示了不同种族和语言偏好群体在不同eHLQ领域的差异,对解决数字健康不平等问题具有启示意义。

结论

在3个eHLQ领域中,偏好西班牙语的拉丁裔儿科护理人员的数字健康素养低于非拉丁裔白人护理人员。在“能力”方面低于偏好英语的拉丁裔护理人员。

相似文献

1
Variations in digital health literacy for pediatric caregivers of hospitalized children: implications for digital health equity.住院儿童的儿科护理人员数字健康素养的差异:对数字健康公平性的影响。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025 Mar 1;32(3):572-578. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae305.
2
Low Prevalence of Adequate eHealth Literacy and Willingness to Use Telemedicine Among Older Adults: Cross-Sectional Study From a Middle-Income Country.老年人中具备足够电子健康素养和使用远程医疗意愿的比例较低:来自一个中等收入国家的横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jul 1;27:e65380. doi: 10.2196/65380.
3
Determinants of Digital Health Literacy: International Cross-Sectional Study.数字健康素养的决定因素:国际横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 30;27:e66631. doi: 10.2196/66631.
4
Validity Evidence Based on Relations to Other Variables of the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ): Bayesian Approach to Test for Known-Groups Validity.基于与其他变量关系的电子健康素养问卷 (eHLQ) 的有效性证据:用于检验已知组有效性的贝叶斯方法。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 14;23(10):e30243. doi: 10.2196/30243.
5
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
6
Gender differences in the context of interventions for improving health literacy in migrants: a qualitative evidence synthesis.移民健康素养提升干预措施背景下的性别差异:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 12;12(12):CD013302. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013302.pub2.
7
Interventions for improving adherence to amblyopia treatments in children.改善儿童弱视治疗依从性的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jul 2;7(7):CD015820. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015820.pub2.
8
Assessing child development scores among minority and Indigenous language versus dominant language speakers: a cross-sectional analysis of national Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys.评估少数民族和原住民语言与主导语言使用者的儿童发育评分:对全国多指标类集调查的横断面分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2024 Jan;12(1):e90-e99. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(23)00456-4. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
9
A Shadow of Doubt: Is There Implicit Bias Among Orthopaedic Surgery Faculty and Residents Regarding Race and Gender?疑虑重重:骨科手术教员和住院医师在种族和性别方面是否存在隐性偏见?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jul 1;482(7):1145-1155. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002933. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
10
Utilization and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Direct-to-Consumer Telemedicine During the First 6 Weeks of the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Largest Pediatric Ambulatory Network in New York State.纽约州最大儿科门诊网络中新冠疫情前六周内面向消费者的远程医疗的使用情况及患者报告结局
Telemed J E Health. 2024 Jun;30(7):e1944-e1953. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2023.0483. Epub 2024 Apr 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Beyond the individual.超越个体。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025 Mar 1;32(3):415-416. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaf020.

本文引用的文献

1
Translation, cultural adaptation and validity assessment of the Dutch version of the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire: a mixed-method approach.荷兰版电子健康素养问卷的翻译、文化调适和效度评估:混合方法研究。
BMC Public Health. 2023 May 30;23(1):1006. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15869-4.
2
The Swedish Version of the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire: Translation, Cultural Adaptation, and Validation Study.《电子健康素养问卷》瑞典语版:翻译、文化调适和验证研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Apr 12;25:e43267. doi: 10.2196/43267.
3
The Use of Digital Health Services Among Patients and Citizens Living at Home: Scoping Review.居家患者和居民使用数字健康服务的情况:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Mar 27;25:e44711. doi: 10.2196/44711.
4
Disparities in patient portal access by US adults before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.美国成年人在新冠疫情之前及期间使用患者门户网站的差异。
JAMIA Open. 2022 Dec 16;5(4):ooac104. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooac104. eCollection 2022 Dec.
5
Digital Health Literacy as a Predictor of Awareness, Engagement, and Use of a National Web-Based Personal Health Record: Population-Based Survey Study.数字健康素养作为国家网络个人健康记录的知晓度、参与度和使用度的预测因素:基于人群的调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Sep 16;24(9):e35772. doi: 10.2196/35772.
6
Validation of the German eHealth impact questionnaire for online health information users affected by multiple sclerosis.验证受多发性硬化症影响的在线健康信息使用者的德国电子健康影响问卷。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Aug 16;22(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01968-6.
7
Family Input for Quality and Safety (FIQS): Using mobile technology for in-hospital reporting from families and patients.家庭参与医疗质量和安全(FIQS):利用移动技术进行院内来自家庭和患者的报告。
J Hosp Med. 2022 Jun;17(6):456-465. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2777. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
8
Validity Testing and Cultural Adaptation of the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ) Among People With Chronic Diseases in Taiwan: Mixed Methods Study.电子健康素养问卷(eHLQ)在台湾慢性病患者中的有效性检验和文化调适:混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 19;24(1):e32855. doi: 10.2196/32855.
9
Validity Evidence Based on Relations to Other Variables of the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ): Bayesian Approach to Test for Known-Groups Validity.基于与其他变量关系的电子健康素养问卷 (eHLQ) 的有效性证据:用于检验已知组有效性的贝叶斯方法。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 14;23(10):e30243. doi: 10.2196/30243.
10
Impact of language preference and health literacy on health information-seeking experiences among a low-income, multilingual cohort.语言偏好和健康素养对低收入、多语言人群健康信息寻求体验的影响。
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 May;105(5):1268-1275. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.08.028. Epub 2021 Aug 26.