Suppr超能文献

住院儿童的儿科护理人员数字健康素养的差异:对数字健康公平性的影响。

Variations in digital health literacy for pediatric caregivers of hospitalized children: implications for digital health equity.

作者信息

Crook Steven, Rosenbluth Glenn, Glidden David V, Fernandez Alicia, Lee Chuan-Mei, Avina Lizette, Magana Leslie, Washington Kiana, Bardach Naomi S

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, United States.

Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, United States.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025 Mar 1;32(3):572-578. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae305.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We sought to assess whether race, ethnicity, and preferred language were associated with digital health literacy in pediatric caregivers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used linear regression to measure associations between 3 eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ) domains (score range: 1-4) and demographic characteristics.

RESULTS

Non-Latinx White respondents (n = 230) had highest adjusted mean eHLQ scores: 3.44 (95% confidence interval: 3.36-3.52) in "Ability to engage," 3.39 (3.31 to 3.47) in "Feel safe and in control," and 3.34 (3.25 to 3.41) in "Motivated." By contrast, Spanish-preferring Latinx respondents (n = 246) had lower adjusted mean scores across all 3 eHLQ domains: 2.97 (P < .0001), 3.21 (P = .004), and 3.19 (P = .033), respectively.

DISCUSSION

Our study contributes insights in variations across ethnoracial and language preference groups by different eHLQ domains, with implications for addressing digital health inequities.

CONCLUSION

Digital health literacy was lower in Spanish-preferring Latinx pediatric caregivers compared to non-Latinx White caregivers across 3 eHLQ domains. It was lower than English-preferring Latinx caregivers in "Ability."

摘要

目的

我们试图评估种族、族裔和偏好语言是否与儿科护理人员的数字健康素养相关。

材料与方法

我们使用线性回归来衡量3个电子健康素养问卷(eHLQ)领域(得分范围:1 - 4)与人口统计学特征之间的关联。

结果

非拉丁裔白人受访者(n = 230)在调整后的eHLQ平均得分最高:“参与能力”领域为3.44(95%置信区间:3.36 - 3.52),“感到安全和掌控”领域为3.39(3.31至3.47),“有动力”领域为3.34(3.25至3.41)。相比之下,偏好西班牙语的拉丁裔受访者(n = 246)在所有3个eHLQ领域的调整后平均得分较低:分别为2.97(P <.0001)、3.21(P =.004)和3.19(P =.033)。

讨论

我们的研究揭示了不同种族和语言偏好群体在不同eHLQ领域的差异,对解决数字健康不平等问题具有启示意义。

结论

在3个eHLQ领域中,偏好西班牙语的拉丁裔儿科护理人员的数字健康素养低于非拉丁裔白人护理人员。在“能力”方面低于偏好英语的拉丁裔护理人员。

相似文献

3
Determinants of Digital Health Literacy: International Cross-Sectional Study.
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 30;27:e66631. doi: 10.2196/66631.
6
Gender differences in the context of interventions for improving health literacy in migrants: a qualitative evidence synthesis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 12;12(12):CD013302. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013302.pub2.
7
Interventions for improving adherence to amblyopia treatments in children.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jul 2;7(7):CD015820. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015820.pub2.
9
A Shadow of Doubt: Is There Implicit Bias Among Orthopaedic Surgery Faculty and Residents Regarding Race and Gender?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jul 1;482(7):1145-1155. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002933. Epub 2024 Jan 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Beyond the individual.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025 Mar 1;32(3):415-416. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaf020.

本文引用的文献

3
4
Disparities in patient portal access by US adults before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.
JAMIA Open. 2022 Dec 16;5(4):ooac104. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooac104. eCollection 2022 Dec.
6
Validation of the German eHealth impact questionnaire for online health information users affected by multiple sclerosis.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Aug 16;22(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01968-6.
10
Impact of language preference and health literacy on health information-seeking experiences among a low-income, multilingual cohort.
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 May;105(5):1268-1275. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.08.028. Epub 2021 Aug 26.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验