• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低温和青贮期对燕麦青贮饲料细菌群落的影响——基于单分子实时测序技术

Impacts of Low Temperature and Ensiling Period on the Bacterial Community of Oat Silage by SMRT.

作者信息

Li Xiaomei, Chen Fei, Wang Xuekai, Sun Lin, Guo Linna, Xiong Yi, Wang Yuan, Zhou Hongzhang, Jia Shangang, Yang Fuyu, Ni Kuikui

机构信息

College of Grassland Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.

Inner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural & Animal Husbandry Sciences, Hohhot 010031, China.

出版信息

Microorganisms. 2021 Jan 28;9(2):274. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9020274.

DOI:10.3390/microorganisms9020274
PMID:33525587
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7910925/
Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate how storage temperatures influence the bacterial community of oat silage during the ensiling process via PacBio single molecule, real-time sequencing technology (SMRT). Forage oat was ensiled at four different temperatures (5 °C, 10 °C, 15 °C, and 25 °C) and ensiling days (7, 14, 30, and 60 days). With the rise in storage temperature, the lactic acid content showed an increased trend. Acetic acid production was observed highest in silage fermented at 5 °C compared with other treatments, and was also the dominant bacterial species. and were exclusively detected in silages at 10 °C, 15 °C, and 25 °C, and dominated the fermentation after 60 days of ensiling at 10 °C and 25 °C, respectively. In addition, , , and may be related to changes in the fermentation products due to the differences in ensiling temperature. In conclusion, results of this study improve our understanding of the complicated microbial composition underlying silage fermentation at low temperatures, which might contribute to target-based regulation methods for enhancing silage quality and developing new inoculants.

摘要

本研究的目的是通过PacBio单分子实时测序技术(SMRT),研究贮藏温度如何在青贮过程中影响燕麦青贮饲料的细菌群落。将饲用燕麦在四个不同温度(5℃、10℃、15℃和25℃)和青贮天数(7天、14天、30天和60天)下进行青贮。随着贮藏温度的升高,乳酸含量呈上升趋势。与其他处理相比,在5℃下发酵的青贮饲料中乙酸产量最高,且也是优势细菌种类。[未明确的细菌名称1]和[未明确的细菌名称2]分别仅在10℃、15℃和25℃的青贮饲料中检测到,且分别在10℃和25℃青贮60天后在发酵过程中占主导地位。此外,[未明确的细菌名称3]、[未明确的细菌名称4]和[未明确的细菌名称5]可能由于青贮温度的差异而与发酵产物的变化有关。总之,本研究结果增进了我们对低温青贮发酵过程中复杂微生物组成的理解,这可能有助于制定基于目标的调控方法以提高青贮饲料质量并开发新型接种剂。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0012/7910925/d27bb01e6b91/microorganisms-09-00274-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0012/7910925/505f916770cf/microorganisms-09-00274-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0012/7910925/22dc544324d6/microorganisms-09-00274-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0012/7910925/d4b6a848fe30/microorganisms-09-00274-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0012/7910925/4e157cc9820c/microorganisms-09-00274-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0012/7910925/7e707cb84cd9/microorganisms-09-00274-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0012/7910925/d27bb01e6b91/microorganisms-09-00274-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0012/7910925/505f916770cf/microorganisms-09-00274-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0012/7910925/22dc544324d6/microorganisms-09-00274-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0012/7910925/d4b6a848fe30/microorganisms-09-00274-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0012/7910925/4e157cc9820c/microorganisms-09-00274-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0012/7910925/7e707cb84cd9/microorganisms-09-00274-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0012/7910925/d27bb01e6b91/microorganisms-09-00274-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Impacts of Low Temperature and Ensiling Period on the Bacterial Community of Oat Silage by SMRT.低温和青贮期对燕麦青贮饲料细菌群落的影响——基于单分子实时测序技术
Microorganisms. 2021 Jan 28;9(2):274. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9020274.
2
Dynamics of Bacterial Community and Fermentation Quality during Ensiling of Wilted and Unwilted Leaf Silage with or without Lactic Acid Bacterial Inoculants.萎蔫和未萎蔫叶片青贮中添加或不添加乳酸菌发酵剂时细菌群落动态和发酵品质。
mSphere. 2019 Aug 7;4(4):e00341-19. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00341-19.
3
Dry matter recovery, ensiling characteristics and aerobic stability of oat silage treated with microbial inoculants at different temperatures.不同温度下经微生物接种剂处理的燕麦青贮饲料的干物质回收率、青贮特性及有氧稳定性
Arch Anim Nutr. 2022 Jun-Dec;76(3-6):175-190. doi: 10.1080/1745039X.2022.2155392. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
4
Bacterial and fungal core microbiomes associated with small grain silages during ensiling and aerobic spoilage.在青贮和有氧变质过程中与小粒谷物青贮饲料相关的细菌和真菌核心微生物群。
BMC Microbiol. 2017 Mar 3;17(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12866-017-0947-0.
5
Dynamics of microbial community during ensiling direct-cut alfalfa with and without LAB inoculant and sugar.添加和不添加乳酸菌接种剂及糖的直接刈割苜蓿青贮过程中微生物群落的动态变化
J Appl Microbiol. 2017 Jun;122(6):1456-1470. doi: 10.1111/jam.13456. Epub 2017 May 3.
6
Effects of LAB Inoculants on the Fermentation Quality, Chemical Composition, and Bacterial Community of Oat Silage on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau.乳酸菌接种剂对青藏高原燕麦青贮饲料发酵品质、化学成分及细菌群落的影响
Microorganisms. 2022 Apr 8;10(4):787. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10040787.
7
Effects of storage temperature and ensiling period on fermentation products, aerobic stability and microbial communities of total mixed ration silage.贮存温度和青贮期对全混合日粮青贮发酵产物、有氧稳定性和微生物群落的影响。
J Appl Microbiol. 2013 Jun;114(6):1687-95. doi: 10.1111/jam.12200. Epub 2013 Apr 9.
8
Different lactic acid bacteria and their combinations regulated the fermentation process of ensiled alfalfa: ensiling characteristics, dynamics of bacterial community and their functional shifts.不同乳酸菌及其组合对青贮苜蓿发酵过程的调控:青贮特性、细菌群落动态及其功能转变。
Microb Biotechnol. 2021 May;14(3):1171-1182. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.13785. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
9
Fermentation characteristics, chemical composition and microbial community of tropical forage silage under different temperatures.不同温度下热带牧草青贮饲料的发酵特性、化学成分及微生物群落
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2019 May;32(5):665-674. doi: 10.5713/ajas.18.0085. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
10
Microbial Community Dynamics and Natural Fermentation Profiles of Ensiled Alpine Grass Prepared From Different Regions of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau.青藏高原不同地区制备的青贮高山草的微生物群落动态及自然发酵特征
Front Microbiol. 2020 May 12;11:855. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00855. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigating the efficacy of an exopolysaccharide (EPS)-producing strain Lactiplantibacillus plantarum L75 on oat silage fermentation at different temperatures.研究产胞外多糖(EPS)的植物乳杆菌 L75 在不同温度下对燕麦青贮发酵的效果。
Microb Biotechnol. 2024 Apr;17(4):e14454. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.14454.
2
The influence of low-temperature resistant lactic acid bacteria on the enhancement of quality and the microbial community in winter Jerusalem Artichoke () silage on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau.耐低温乳酸菌对青藏高原冬季菊芋青贮品质提升及微生物群落的影响
Front Microbiol. 2024 Jan 29;15:1297220. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1297220. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of Lactobacillus hilgardii 60TS-2, with or without homofermentative Lactobacillus plantarum B90, on the aerobic stability, fermentation quality and microbial community dynamics in sugarcane top silage.嗜热链球菌 60TS-2 及其与同型发酵植物乳杆菌 B90 组合对甘蔗梢青贮有氧稳定性、发酵品质及微生物群落动态的影响。
Bioresour Technol. 2020 Sep;312:123600. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123600. Epub 2020 May 30.
2
Effects of Lactobacillus plantarum additive and temperature on the ensiling quality and microbial community dynamics of cauliflower leaf silages.植物乳杆菌添加剂和温度对花椰菜叶青贮品质和微生物群落动态的影响。
Bioresour Technol. 2020 Jul;307:123238. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123238. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
3
Decarboxylase activity of the non-starter lactic acid bacterium gives crack defects in Gouda cheese through the production of γ-aminobutyric acid.
非发酵乳杆菌的脱羧酶活性通过生成γ-氨基丁酸在高达奶酪中产生裂纹缺陷。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2024 Feb 21;90(2):e0165523. doi: 10.1128/aem.01655-23. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
4
Study on Dynamic Fermentation of Oat Silage Assisted by Exogenous Fibrolytic Enzymes.外源纤维分解酶辅助燕麦青贮动态发酵的研究
Plants (Basel). 2023 Dec 19;13(1):6. doi: 10.3390/plants13010006.
5
Responses of microbial community dynamics, co-occurrences, functional shifts, and natural fermentation profiles of silage to altitudinal gradients.青贮对海拔梯度的微生物群落动态、共存、功能转变和自然发酵特征的响应。
Microbiol Spectr. 2024 Jan 11;12(1):e0251623. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02516-23. Epub 2023 Dec 6.
6
Comparative genomics of with an emphasis on strain FOL-19 isolated from cheese.以从奶酪中分离出的FOL-19菌株为重点的比较基因组学。
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2023 Oct 14;21:5111-5124. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2023.10.004. eCollection 2023.
7
Effects of harvest stages and lactic acid bacteria additives on the nutritional quality of silage derived from triticale, rye, and oat on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau.青藏高原小黑麦、黑麦和燕麦青贮的收获期和乳酸菌添加剂对其营养价值的影响。
PeerJ. 2023 Aug 3;11:e15772. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15772. eCollection 2023.
8
Effect of isolated lactic acid bacteria on the quality and bacterial diversity of native grass silage.分离乳酸菌对天然禾本科牧草青贮品质及细菌多样性的影响
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Jul 6;14:1160369. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1160369. eCollection 2023.
9
Community Synergy of Lactic Acid Bacteria and Cleaner Fermentation of Oat Silage Prepared with a Multispecies Microbial Inoculant.多菌种微生物添加剂对燕麦青贮的协同发酵和清洁发酵。
Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Jun 15;11(3):e0070523. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00705-23. Epub 2023 May 11.
10
Effects of growth stage on the fermentation quality, microbial community, and metabolomic properties of Italian ryegrass ( Lam.) silage.生育期对多花黑麦草青贮发酵品质、微生物群落及代谢组学特性的影响
Front Microbiol. 2023 Jan 13;13:1054612. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1054612. eCollection 2022.
Effects of Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated From Rumen Fluid and Feces of Dairy Cows on Fermentation Quality, Microbial Community, and Digestibility of Alfalfa Silage.
从奶牛瘤胃液和粪便中分离的乳酸菌对苜蓿青贮饲料发酵品质、微生物群落及消化率的影响
Front Microbiol. 2020 Jan 9;10:2998. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02998. eCollection 2019.
4
Silage fermentation-updates focusing on the performance of micro-organisms.青贮发酵的最新进展聚焦于微生物的性能。
J Appl Microbiol. 2020 Apr;128(4):966-984. doi: 10.1111/jam.14450. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
5
Bacterial Dynamics of Wheat Silage.小麦青贮饲料的细菌动态
Front Microbiol. 2019 Jul 9;10:1532. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01532. eCollection 2019.
6
Novel lactic acid bacteria strains as inoculants on alfalfa silage fermentation.新型乳酸菌菌株作为苜蓿青贮发酵的接种剂。
Sci Rep. 2019 May 29;9(1):8007. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44520-9.
7
Microbial community and fermentation characteristic of Italian ryegrass silage prepared with corn stover and lactic acid bacteria.利用玉米秸秆和乳酸菌制备的黑麦草青贮的微生物群落和发酵特性。
Bioresour Technol. 2019 May;279:166-173. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.01.107. Epub 2019 Jan 26.
8
Assessment of the non-lactic acid bacteria microbiota in fresh cucumbers and commercially fermented cucumber pickles brined with 6% NaCl.评估新鲜黄瓜和用 6% 氯化钠腌制的商业发酵黄瓜泡菜中的非乳酸菌微生物组。
Food Microbiol. 2019 Feb;77:10-20. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2018.08.003. Epub 2018 Aug 7.
9
Microbial communities and natural fermentation of corn silages prepared with farm bunker-silo in Southwest China.中国西南地区农场筒仓青贮玉米的微生物群落和自然发酵。
Bioresour Technol. 2018 Oct;265:282-290. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.06.018. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
10
Assessing the fermentation quality and microbial community of the mixed silage of forage soybean with crop corn or sorghum.评价饲用大豆与大田玉米或高粱混贮的发酵品质和微生物群落。
Bioresour Technol. 2018 Oct;265:563-567. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.05.097. Epub 2018 May 29.