Dourson Adam J, Willits Adam, Raut Namrata G R, Kader Leena, Young Erin, Jankowski Michael P, Chidambaran Vidya
Department of Anesthesia, Division of Pain Management, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio,USA.
Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
Can J Pain. 2022 May 10;6(2):85-107. doi: 10.1080/24740527.2021.2021799. eCollection 2022.
Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) in children remains an important problem with no effective preventive or therapeutic strategies. Recently, genomic underpinnings explaining additional interindividual risk beyond psychological factors have been proposed.
We present a comprehensive review of current preclinical and clinical evidence for genetic and epigenetic mechanisms relevant to pediatric CPSP.
Narrative review.
Animal models are relevant to translational research for unraveling genomic mechanisms. For example, , and mutant mice show altered mechanical hypersensitivity to injury, and variants of the same genes have been associated with CPSP susceptibility in humans; similarly, differential DNA methylation () and miRNAs (miR-96/7a) have shown translational implications. Animal studies also suggest that crosstalk between neurons and immune cells may be involved in nociceptive priming observed in neonates. In children, differential DNA methylation in regulatory genomic regions enriching GABAergic, dopaminergic, and immune pathways, as well as polygenic risk scores for enhanced prediction of CPSP, have been described. Genome-wide studies in pediatric CPSP are scarce, but pathways identified by adult gene association studies point to potential common mechanisms.
Bench-to-bedside genomics research in pediatric CPSP is currently limited. Reverse translational approaches, use of other -omics, and inclusion of pediatric/CPSP endophenotypes in large-scale biobanks may be potential solutions. Time of developmental vulnerability and longitudinal genomic changes after surgery warrant further investigation. Emergence of promising precision pain management strategies based on gene editing and epigenetic programing emphasize need for further research in pediatric CPSP-related genomics.
儿童慢性术后疼痛(CPSP)仍然是一个重要问题,目前尚无有效的预防或治疗策略。最近,有人提出基因组学基础可以解释除心理因素之外的个体间额外风险。
我们对目前与儿科CPSP相关的遗传和表观遗传机制的临床前和临床证据进行全面综述。
叙述性综述。
动物模型与揭示基因组机制的转化研究相关。例如, 、 和 突变小鼠对损伤的机械超敏反应发生改变,并且相同基因的变体与人类CPSP易感性相关;同样,差异DNA甲基化( )和微小RNA(miR-96/7a)也具有转化意义。动物研究还表明,神经元与免疫细胞之间的相互作用可能参与新生儿观察到的伤害性致敏。在儿童中,已经描述了调节基因组区域中富集GABA能、多巴胺能和免疫途径的差异DNA甲基化,以及用于增强CPSP预测的多基因风险评分。儿科CPSP的全基因组研究很少,但成人基因关联研究确定的途径指向潜在的共同机制。
目前儿科CPSP从实验室到临床的基因组学研究有限。反向转化方法、使用其他“组学”技术以及将儿科/CPSP内表型纳入大规模生物样本库可能是潜在的解决方案。发育易损期和手术后的纵向基因组变化值得进一步研究。基于基因编辑和表观遗传编程的有前景的精准疼痛管理策略的出现强调了对儿科CPSP相关基因组学进一步研究的必要性。