van Dijk F J, Souman A M, de Vries F F
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1987;59(2):133-45. doi: 10.1007/BF00378491.
Non-auditory effects of noise were studied among 539 male workers from seven industries. The LAeq, assessed by personal noise dosimetry, has been used to study acute effects. Various indices of total noise exposure, involving level and duration, were developed for long-term effect studies. In the analysis close attention was paid to prevent confounding, e.g. by other adverse working conditions. As expected, hearing loss increased with total noise exposure. Tinnitus was related particularly to hearing loss. Dizziness and hoarseness, however, were not related with noise exposure in this study. Also no correlation could be demonstrated between blood pressure and total noise exposure after correction for age, relative weight and various confounding variables. Use of hearing protection, selection processes and incomplete analysis of interactions between independent variables are suggested for possible explanation. About two-thirds of the workers reported noise annoyance. Various aspects were mentioned, such as irritation, surprise and impairment of communication and perception. Mentally stressful tasks appeared to be the most noise-sensitive. Particularly annoying noise sources, mental work load and time pressure had a relatively large impact on noise annoyance in comparison with the influence of noise level (LAeq) itself. Stress responses were not simply related to the noise exposure level, although consistent positive relations could be demonstrated between symptoms of stress and noise annoyance. Various findings led to the conclusion that noise exposure together with stressful mental activities may lead to disturbed concentration, irritation and annoyance. Experienced stress in turn may render workers more susceptible to noise. To overcome some limitations of this study, cohort studies and studies designed to assess interaction-effects are recommended.
对来自七个行业的539名男性工人的噪声非听觉效应进行了研究。通过个人噪声剂量计评估的等效连续A声级(LAeq)已用于研究急性效应。为长期效应研究制定了各种总噪声暴露指标,包括强度和持续时间。在分析中,密切关注防止混杂因素,例如其他不利的工作条件。正如预期的那样,听力损失随着总噪声暴露量的增加而增加。耳鸣尤其与听力损失有关。然而,在本研究中,头晕和声音嘶哑与噪声暴露无关。在校正年龄、相对体重和各种混杂变量后,血压与总噪声暴露之间也未显示出相关性。建议使用听力保护装置、筛选过程以及对自变量之间相互作用的不完整分析来进行可能的解释。约三分之二的工人报告有噪声烦恼。提到了各个方面,如烦躁、惊讶以及沟通和感知受损。脑力压力大的任务似乎对噪声最敏感。与噪声水平(LAeq)本身的影响相比,特别烦人的噪声源、脑力工作量和时间压力对噪声烦恼的影响相对较大。应激反应并不简单地与噪声暴露水平相关,尽管应激症状与噪声烦恼之间可以证明存在一致的正相关关系。各种研究结果得出结论,噪声暴露与紧张的脑力活动可能导致注意力不集中、烦躁和烦恼。反过来,经历的压力可能使工人更容易受到噪声的影响。为了克服本研究的一些局限性,建议进行队列研究和旨在评估相互作用效应的研究。