Independent Researcher, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2022 May 19;17(5):e0267498. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267498. eCollection 2022.
The legal status of Cannabis is changing, fueling an increasing diversity of Cannabis-derived products. Because Cannabis contains dozens of chemical compounds with potential psychoactive or medicinal effects, understanding this phytochemical diversity is crucial. The legal Cannabis industry heavily markets products to consumers based on widely used labeling systems purported to predict the effects of different "strains." We analyzed the cannabinoid and terpene content of commercial Cannabis samples across six US states, finding distinct chemical phenotypes (chemotypes) which are reliably present. By comparing the observed phytochemical diversity to the commercial labels commonly attached to Cannabis-derived product samples, we show that commercial labels do not consistently align with the observed chemical diversity. However, certain labels do show a biased association with specific chemotypes. These results have implications for the classification of commercial Cannabis, design of animal and human research, and regulation of consumer marketing-areas which today are often divorced from the chemical reality of the Cannabis-derived material they wish to represent.
大麻的法律地位正在发生变化,催生出越来越多样化的大麻衍生产品。由于大麻含有数十种具有潜在精神活性或药用效果的化学化合物,因此了解这种植物化学多样性至关重要。合法的大麻产业根据广泛使用的标签系统向消费者大力推销产品,这些标签系统据称可以预测不同“品种”的效果。我们分析了六个美国州的商业大麻样本中的大麻素和萜烯含量,发现存在可靠的独特化学表型(化学型)。通过将观察到的植物化学多样性与商业标签通常附加到大麻衍生产品样本,我们表明商业标签并不始终与观察到的化学多样性一致。然而,某些标签确实与特定的化学型存在偏倚关联。这些结果对商业大麻的分类、动物和人类研究的设计以及消费者营销的监管具有影响——这些领域今天往往与他们希望代表的大麻衍生材料的化学现实相脱节。