Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
Department of Family Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
Crit Care Med. 2022 Sep 1;50(9):1296-1305. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005583. Epub 2022 May 23.
To determine the effect of daily written updates on the satisfaction and psychologic symptoms of families of ICU patients.
Randomized controlled trial.
Single, urban academic medical center.
Surrogates of nondecisional, critically ill adults with high risk of mortality ( n = 252) enrolled from June 2019 to January 2021.
Usual communication with the medical team with or without written communication detailing the suspected cause and management approach of each ICU problem, updated each day.
Participants completed surveys at three time points during the ICU stay: enrollment ( n = 252), 1 week ( n = 229), and 2 weeks ( n = 109) after enrollment. Satisfaction with care was measured using the Critical Care Family Needs Inventory (CCFNI). The presence of anxiety, depression, and acute stress were assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Impact of Events Scale Revised (IES-R). CCFNI, HADS, and IES-R scores were similar among participants assigned to the intervention group and control group upon enrollment and during the first week after enrollment ( p > 0.05). From enrollment to the second week after enrollment, there was an improvement in CCFNI and HADS scores among participants assigned to the intervention group versus the control group. At week 2, CCFNI scores were significantly lower among participants in the intervention group versus the control group, indicating greater satisfaction with care: 15.1 (95% CI, 14.2-16.0) versus 16.4, (95% CI, 15.5-17.3); p = 0.04. In addition, 2 weeks after enrollment, the odds of symptoms of anxiety, depression, and acute stress among participants assigned to the intervention versus control group were 0.16 (95% CI, 0.03-0.82; p = 0.03); 0.15 (95% CI, 0.01-1.87; p = 0.14); and 0.27 (95% CI, 0.06-1.27; p = 0.10), respectively.
Written communication improved satisfaction and the emotional well-being of families of critically ill patients, supporting its use as a supplement to traditional communication approaches.
确定每日书面更新对 ICU 患者家属的满意度和心理症状的影响。
随机对照试验。
单中心城市学术医疗中心。
从 2019 年 6 月至 2021 年 1 月招募的无决策能力、危重病、死亡风险高的非成年患者的家属(n=252)。
与医疗团队进行常规沟通,或在此基础上每日详细记录每个 ICU 问题的疑似病因和处理方法。
参与者在 ICU 住院期间三个时间点完成了调查:入组时(n=252)、入组后 1 周(n=229)和 2 周(n=109)。使用重症监护家庭需求清单(CCFNI)评估护理满意度。使用医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS)和修订后的事件影响量表(IES-R)评估焦虑、抑郁和急性应激的发生情况。入组时和入组后第 1 周,干预组和对照组的参与者的 CCFNI、HADS 和 IES-R 评分相似(p>0.05)。从入组到入组后第 2 周,与对照组相比,干预组的 CCFNI 和 HADS 评分有所改善。在第 2 周,与对照组相比,干预组的 CCFNI 评分明显较低,表明对护理的满意度更高:15.1(95%置信区间,14.2-16.0)与 16.4(95%置信区间,15.5-17.3);p=0.04。此外,入组后 2 周,与对照组相比,干预组出现焦虑、抑郁和急性应激症状的参与者的比值比分别为 0.16(95%置信区间,0.03-0.82;p=0.03)、0.15(95%置信区间,0.01-1.87;p=0.14)和 0.27(95%置信区间,0.06-1.27;p=0.10)。
书面沟通提高了危重病患者家属的满意度和情绪健康水平,支持将其作为传统沟通方式的补充。