Dell'Osso Liliana, Amatori Giulia, Cappelli Andrea, Cremone Ivan Mirko, Massimetti Gabriele, Gravina Davide, Nardi Benedetta, Benedetti Francesca, Chiarantini Ilaria, Luciano Mario, Berardelli Isabella, Brondino Natascia, De Gregorio Marianna, Deste Giacomo, Nola Marta, Reitano Antonino, Muscatello Maria Rosaria Anna, Pompili Maurizio, Politi Pierluigi, Vita Antonio, Carmassi Claudia, Maj Mario
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli," Naples, Italy.
Front Psychiatry. 2022 May 12;13:913286. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.913286. eCollection 2022.
A growing body of literature has demonstrated the utility of a dimensional perspective on mental disorders. The current study aims to determine the psychometric properties of the Catatonia Spectrum (CS), a new questionnaire specifically tailored to assess the spectrum of catatonia, from full blown forms to subthreshold ones.
86 adults with at least three symptom criteria for catatonia according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), 81 adults affected by borderline personality disorder (BPD), 104 adults with a diagnosis of major depressive disorder (MDD), and 105 subjects without mental disorders (CTL), were recruited from six Italian University Departments of Psychiatry and administered the: Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS), Bush-Francis Catatonia Screening Instrument (BFCSI), and CS.
CS scale demonstrated a high level of internal consistency and excellent test-retest reliability for total and domain scores. CS domain scores were positively and significantly correlated with each other ( < 0.001) with Pearson's coefficients ranging from 0.337 to 0.663. All the CS domain scores were highly correlated with the CS total score. The correlation coefficients between CS and alternative measures of catatonia appeared all significant and positive. Significant differences among diagnostic groups on both CS domains and total scores were found. CS total scores increased significantly and progressively from the CTL, to the MDD and the BDP group, up to the catatonia group, which reported the highest value.
The CS showed excellent internal consistency and test-retest reliability and strong convergent validity with alternative dimensional measures of catatonia. The questionnaire performed differently across the four diagnostic groups, with an increasing score gradient from healthy controls to patients with MDD, BPD and up to the catatonia group.
越来越多的文献表明了从维度角度看待精神障碍的实用性。本研究旨在确定紧张症谱系(CS)问卷的心理测量特性,该问卷是专门为评估紧张症谱系而设计的新问卷,涵盖从典型形式到阈下形式。
从意大利六个大学精神病学系招募了86名根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM - 5)至少有三项紧张症症状标准的成年人、81名患有边缘性人格障碍(BPD)的成年人、104名被诊断为重度抑郁症(MDD)的成年人以及105名无精神障碍的受试者(CTL),并对他们进行了:布什 - 弗朗西斯紧张症评定量表(BFCRS)、布什 - 弗朗西斯紧张症筛查工具(BFCSI)和CS问卷的测试。
CS量表在总分和各领域得分方面显示出高度的内部一致性和出色的重测信度。CS各领域得分之间呈显著正相关(<0.001),皮尔逊系数范围为0.337至0.663。所有CS领域得分与CS总分高度相关。CS与紧张症替代测量指标之间的相关系数均显著且为正。在CS领域和总分方面,诊断组之间存在显著差异。CS总分从CTL组到MDD组、BDP组,直至紧张症组显著且逐步增加,紧张症组得分最高。
CS显示出出色的内部一致性、重测信度以及与紧张症替代维度测量指标的强收敛效度。该问卷在四个诊断组中的表现不同,从健康对照组到MDD患者、BPD患者直至紧张症组,得分呈递增梯度。