• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人手术中的感知专业知识(ExPeRtS):所见与所言。

Expertise in perception during robotic surgery (ExPeRtS): What we see and what we say.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.

Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Avenue, S-321, San Francisco, CA, 94143-0470, USA.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 2022 Sep;224(3):908-913. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.05.006. Epub 2022 May 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.05.006
PMID:35637018
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Given the challenges of teaching in robotic operating rooms, we sought to investigate the language of perceptual expertise used by robotic surgeons, in an effort to improve current approaches to robotic training.

METHODS

Expert robotic surgeons reviewed 8 anonymous video clips portraying key portions of two robotic general surgery procedures and their comments were recorded and transcribed. Using content analysis, each transcript was double-coded and reconciled using a consensus developed codebook.

RESULTS

Seventeen expert robotic surgeons participated and comments formed two primary themes: visual comprehension and surgical technique. Surgeons minimally used tactile language. Risk avoidance was a second-order theme dominating language used.

CONCLUSIONS

Experts occasionally used tactile language and emphasized risk avoidance as they observed robotic surgery. Despite the need to communicate perceptual expertise to trainees in robotic surgery, tactile language was not exhibited by expert surgeons, revealing an important future area of focus for intraoperative teaching skills.

摘要

背景

鉴于机器人手术室教学的挑战,我们试图研究机器人外科医生使用的感知专长语言,以努力改进当前的机器人培训方法。

方法

专家机器人外科医生审查了 8 个匿名视频剪辑,这些剪辑描绘了两个机器人普通外科手术的关键部分,记录并转录了他们的评论。使用内容分析,每个记录都进行了双重编码,并使用共识开发的代码本进行了协调。

结果

17 名专家机器人外科医生参与了这项研究,评论形成了两个主要主题:视觉理解和手术技术。外科医生很少使用触觉语言。风险规避是主导语言使用的第二级主题。

结论

专家在观察机器人手术时偶尔会使用触觉语言并强调风险规避。尽管需要向机器人手术的学员传达感知专长,但专家外科医生并没有表现出触觉语言,这揭示了术中教学技能的一个重要未来关注领域。

相似文献

1
Expertise in perception during robotic surgery (ExPeRtS): What we see and what we say.机器人手术中的感知专业知识(ExPeRtS):所见与所言。
Am J Surg. 2022 Sep;224(3):908-913. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.05.006. Epub 2022 May 25.
2
Enhancing robotic efficiency through the eyes of robotic surgeons: sub-analysis of the expertise in perception during robotic surgery (ExPeRtS) study.从机器人外科医生的视角提高机器人手术效率:机器人手术感知专业技能(ExPeRtS)研究的子分析
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jan;37(1):571-579. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09315-6. Epub 2022 May 17.
3
Does Robotic Surgical Simulator Performance Correlate With Surgical Skill?机器人手术模拟器性能与手术技能相关吗?
J Surg Educ. 2017 Nov-Dec;74(6):1052-1056. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.05.011. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
4
Robotic Surgery: The Impact of Simulation and Other Innovative Platforms on Performance and Training.机器人手术:模拟和其他创新平台对性能和培训的影响。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Mar;28(3):490-495. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.12.001. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
5
Development and validation of a tool for non-technical skills evaluation in robotic surgery-the ICARS system.开发和验证一种用于机器人手术中非技术技能评估的工具——ICARS 系统。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Dec;31(12):5403-5410. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5622-x. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
6
How expert surgeons review robotic videos: A grounded theory study.专家外科医生如何查看机器人手术视频:一项扎根理论研究。
Am J Surg. 2023 Nov;226(5):709-716. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.07.043. Epub 2023 Aug 2.
7
Expert Consensus Recommendations for Robotic Surgery Credentialing.机器人手术认证的专家共识建议。
Ann Surg. 2022 Jul 1;276(1):88-93. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004531. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
8
Skills in minimally invasive and open surgery show limited transferability to robotic surgery: results from a prospective study.微创手术和开放手术技能向机器人手术的转移能力有限:一项前瞻性研究的结果。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Apr;32(4):1656-1667. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6109-0. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
9
How Surgeons Think to Avoid Error: A Case Study of the Neurovascular Bundle Sparing During a Robotic Prostatectomy.外科医生如何避免犯错:机器人前列腺切除术时保留神经血管束的案例研究。
J Surg Educ. 2024 Apr;81(4):570-577. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.01.009.
10
Objective assessment in residency-based training for transoral robotic surgery.住院医师规范化培训中的经口机器人手术客观评估。
Laryngoscope. 2012 Oct;122(10):2184-92. doi: 10.1002/lary.23369. Epub 2012 Aug 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Role of haptic feedback technologies and novel engineering developments for surgical training and robot-assisted surgery.触觉反馈技术和新型工程技术在手术训练及机器人辅助手术中的作用。
Front Robot AI. 2025 Jun 4;12:1567955. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2025.1567955. eCollection 2025.
2
Recommendations for the design of video-based educational interventions as instructional tools in robotic surgical training.基于视频的教育干预措施在机器人外科手术培训中作为教学工具的设计建议。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Jun;17(3):779-784. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01513-7. Epub 2022 Dec 15.