Suppr超能文献

一种用于脊髓损伤患者运动康复的新型外骨骼的安全性和可行性:一项前瞻性、多中心、交叉临床试验。

Safety and Feasibility of a Novel Exoskeleton for Locomotor Rehabilitation of Subjects With Spinal Cord Injury: A Prospective, Multi-Center, and Cross-Over Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Chen Sijing, Wang Zhanbin, Li Yongqiang, Tang Jiashuai, Wang Xue, Huang Liping, Fang Zhuangwei, Xu Tao, Xu Jiang, Guo Feng, Wang Yizhao, Long Jianjun, Wang Xiaodong, Liu Fang, Luo Jianfeng, Wang Yulong, Huang Xiaolin, Jia Zishan, Shuai Mei, Li Jianan

机构信息

Center of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

Jiangsu Zhongshan Geriatric Rehabilitation Hospital, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

Front Neurorobot. 2022 May 12;16:848443. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2022.848443. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety, walking efficiency, physiological cost, don and doff time cost, and user satisfaction of Ai-robot.

DESIGN

Prospective, multi-center, and cross-over trial.

SUBJECTS

Paraplegic subjects ( = 40) with T6-L2 level spinal cord injury.

METHODS

Subjects who could walk independently using Aiwalker, Ailegs, and hip knee ankle foot orthosis (HKAFO) for 6 min within 30 days of training underwent 10 sets of tests. In each set, they completed three 6-min walk test (6MWT) sessions using the three aids in random order.

RESULTS

Skin lesions, pressure sores, and fractures, were the main adverse events, likely due to a lack of experience in using exoskeleton systems. The average 6MWT distances of the Aiwalker, Ailegs, and HKAFO groups were 134.20 ± 18.74, 79.71 ± 18.06, and 48.31 ± 19.87 m, respectively. The average heart rate increases in the Aiwalker (4.21 ± 8.20%) and Ailegs (41.81 ± 23.47%) groups were both significantly lower than that in the HKAFO group (62.33 ± 28.32%) (both < 0.001). The average donning/doffing time costs for Ailegs and Aiwalker were significantly shorter than that of HKAFO (both < 0.001). Satisfaction was higher in the Ailegs and Aiwalker groups (both < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Subjects with paraplegia below T6 level were able to ambulate safely and efficiently with Ai-robot. The use of Ai-robot should be learned under the guidance of experienced medical personnel.

摘要

目的

评估智能机器人的安全性、行走效率、生理成本、穿脱时间成本及用户满意度。

设计

前瞻性、多中心、交叉试验。

研究对象

40例T6-L2水平脊髓损伤的截瘫患者。

方法

在训练30天内能够使用智能步行器、智能腿和髋膝踝足矫形器(HKAFO)独立行走6分钟的患者进行10组测试。每组中,他们以随机顺序使用这三种辅助器具完成三次6分钟步行测试(6MWT)。

结果

皮肤损伤、压疮和骨折是主要不良事件,可能是由于缺乏使用外骨骼系统的经验所致。智能步行器、智能腿和HKAFO组的平均6MWT距离分别为134.20±18.74米、79.71±18.06米和48.31±19.87米。智能步行器组(4.21±8.20%)和智能腿组(41.81±23.47%)的平均心率增加均显著低于HKAFO组(62.33±28.32%)(均P<0.001)。智能腿和智能步行器的平均穿脱时间成本显著短于HKAFO(均P<0.001)。智能腿和智能步行器组的满意度更高(均P<0.001)。

结论

T6水平以下的截瘫患者能够使用智能机器人安全、高效地行走。智能机器人的使用应在有经验的医务人员指导下学习。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2aa1/9133609/c4eaeaa137ab/fnbot-16-848443-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验