Hsu Rafael Ming Chi Santos, Cardoso Fernando Luiz, Varella Marco Antonio Corrêa, Pires Edvane Marlene, Valentova Jaroslava Varella
Department of Experimental Psychology, Institute of Psychology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Center of Physical Education, Physiotherapy, and Sports, State University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
Front Psychol. 2022 May 13;13:790490. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.790490. eCollection 2022.
There are numerous classifications of physical activities (PAs). However, they lack precise grouping criteria and tend to vary according to each author. Among other factors, the individual's level of motivation is considered an important aspect of PA maintenance. In this study, we aimed to (1) compare several PAs according to intrinsic (Interest, Enjoyment, and Competence) and extrinsic (Appearance, Fitness/Health, and Social) motives and (2) analyze PAs with and without previous grouping to explore which PAs are more similar based on the different motivational subscales. We recruited 1,421 physically active Brazilian participants (mean age = 26.83, SD = 10.49). The participants stated which PA they practiced most frequently, and they answered the revised motivation for PA measure. The data were analyzed with multivariate general linear models and Kruskal-Wallis. We found that some PAs consistently differed from others regarding motivational subscales. For example, participants practicing Walking showed less Interest/Enjoyment and Competence motives than participants engaged in several other PAs. Pilates was highlighted by a particularly low level of Social motivation in comparison to other PAs. Furthermore, using the previously suggested categorization of PAs, we also showed consistent distinctions considering each motivational subscale. Specifically, one group of PA (categorized as more Complex, Team, Vigorous, Hybrid, and Combative) scored higher on intrinsic motivation, while the other group of activities (categorized as more Organized, Individual, Moderate, Strength, and Rhythmic) scored higher on Appearance and Fitness/Health motives. Our results thus provide initial evidence for possible new methods of grouping PA types that can improve maintenance behavior using motivation as a grouping factor.
体育活动(PA)有众多分类。然而,它们缺乏精确的分组标准,且往往因作者而异。在其他因素中,个体的动机水平被认为是体育活动维持的一个重要方面。在本研究中,我们旨在:(1)根据内在动机(兴趣、享受和能力)和外在动机(外表、健康/健身和社交)比较几种体育活动;(2)分析预先分组和未预先分组的体育活动,以探索基于不同动机子量表哪些体育活动更相似。我们招募了1421名身体活跃的巴西参与者(平均年龄 = 26.83,标准差 = 10.49)。参与者指出他们最常进行的体育活动,并回答了修订后的体育活动动机测量问卷。数据采用多元一般线性模型和克鲁斯卡尔 - 沃利斯检验进行分析。我们发现,在动机子量表方面,一些体育活动与其他体育活动始终存在差异。例如,与参与其他几种体育活动的参与者相比,进行步行的参与者表现出的兴趣/享受和能力动机较低。与其他体育活动相比,普拉提的社交动机水平特别低。此外,使用先前建议的体育活动分类,我们在考虑每个动机子量表时也显示出一致的差异。具体而言,一组体育活动(归类为更复杂、团队、剧烈、混合和格斗类)在内在动机方面得分较高,而另一组活动(归类为更有组织、个人、中等强度、力量和韵律类)在外表和健康/健身动机方面得分较高。因此,我们的结果为可能的新的体育活动分组方法提供了初步证据,这些方法可以将动机作为分组因素来改善维持行为。