• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Social Justice and Equity: Why Older Adults With Cancer Belong-A Life Course Perspective.社会公正与公平:为什么癌症老年患者也应得到关注——一个生命历程的视角。
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2022 Apr;42:1-13. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_349825.
2
Equity and justice in health.卫生保健中的公平与公正。
Nurs Outlook. 2024 Jul-Aug;72(4):102178. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2024.102178. Epub 2024 May 16.
3
Understanding and addressing social determinants to advance cancer health equity in the United States: A blueprint for practice, research, and policy.了解和应对社会决定因素,以促进美国癌症健康公平:实践、研究和政策蓝图。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jan;70(1):31-46. doi: 10.3322/caac.21586. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
4
The Health Equity Framework: A Science- and Justice-Based Model for Public Health Researchers and Practitioners.健康公平框架:面向公共卫生研究人员和从业者的科学与公正为本的模型。
Health Promot Pract. 2021 Nov;22(6):741-746. doi: 10.1177/1524839920950730. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
5
Lessons Learned from Implementing a Place-Based, Racial Justice-Centered Approach to Health Equity.从实施基于场所、以种族正义为中心的健康公平方法中吸取的经验教训。
Matern Child Health J. 2021 Jan;25(1):66-71. doi: 10.1007/s10995-020-03076-1. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
6
Nursing is a health equity and social justice movement.护理是一项促进健康公平和社会正义的运动。
Public Health Nurs. 2021 Jul;38(4):687-691. doi: 10.1111/phn.12905. Epub 2021 Apr 4.
7
Equity in Cancer Care: Strategies for Oncology Nurses.癌症护理中的公平性:肿瘤护理策略
Nurs Clin North Am. 2017 Mar;52(1):211-225. doi: 10.1016/j.cnur.2016.11.003.
8
Action against inequalities: a synthesis of social justice & equity, diversity, inclusion frameworks.行动反对不平等:社会正义与公平、多样性、包容性框架的综合。
Int J Equity Health. 2024 May 23;23(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02141-3.
9
A Critical Exploration of Migraine as a Health Disparity: the Imperative of an Equity-Oriented, Intersectional Approach.偏头痛作为健康差异的批判性探讨:以公平为导向、交叉视角方法的必要性。
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2018 Oct 5;22(12):79. doi: 10.1007/s11916-018-0731-3.
10
Is 'health equity' bad for our health? A qualitative empirical ethics study of public health policy-makers' perspectives.“健康公平”是否对我们的健康不利?一项关于公共卫生政策制定者观点的定性实证伦理研究。
Can J Public Health. 2018 Dec;109(5-6):633-642. doi: 10.17269/s41997-018-0128-4. Epub 2018 Nov 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Geriatric assessment for the practicing clinician: The why, what, and how.老年综合评估:临床医生的为何、何为及如何做。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2024 Nov-Dec;74(6):496-518. doi: 10.3322/caac.21864. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
2
Addressing Ageism With Geriatric Assessment in Clinical Practice and Research.在临床实践和研究中通过老年医学评估应对年龄歧视。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2024 Dec;20(12):1559-1562. doi: 10.1200/OP.24.00324. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
3
An Annual Symposium on Disparities in Milwaukee, WI, with a 2023 Focus on Older Adults with Cancer.威斯康星州密尔沃基年度差异研讨会,2023 年重点关注癌症老年患者。
Curr Oncol Rep. 2024 Aug;26(8):855-864. doi: 10.1007/s11912-024-01525-6. Epub 2024 May 27.
4
A scoping review of racial, ethnic, socioeconomic, and geographic disparities in the outcomes of older adults with cancer.一项针对老年癌症患者结局的种族、民族、社会经济和地理差异的范围综述。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Jun;72(6):1867-1900. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18881. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
5
Adapting an Adolescent and Young Adult Program Housed in a Quaternary Cancer Centre to a Regional Cancer Centre: Creating Equitable Access to Developmentally Tailored Support.将一个设在四级癌症中心的青少年和青年项目改编为一个地区癌症中心:为发展定制的支持创造公平获取机会。
Curr Oncol. 2024 Feb 27;31(3):1266-1277. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31030095.
6
The disproportionate burden of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) in diverse older adults diagnosed with cancer.在被诊断患有癌症的不同老年人群体中,阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆症(ADRD)的负担不成比例。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2023 Nov;14(8):101610. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101610. Epub 2023 Sep 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Disparities in telemedicine during COVID-19.新冠肺炎疫情期间的远程医疗差距。
Cancer Med. 2022 Feb;11(4):1192-1201. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4518. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
2
Older adults' perceptions of community-based telehealth wellness programs: a qualitative study.老年人对社区远程医疗健康计划的看法:一项定性研究。
Inform Health Soc Care. 2022 Oct 2;47(4):361-372. doi: 10.1080/17538157.2021.2006198. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
3
Evaluation of geriatric assessment and management on the toxic effects of cancer treatment (GAP70+): a cluster-randomised study.老年综合评估和管理对癌症治疗毒性作用的评估(GAP70+):一项集群随机研究。
Lancet. 2021 Nov 20;398(10314):1894-1904. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01789-X. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
4
Geriatric Assessment-Driven Intervention (GAIN) on Chemotherapy-Related Toxic Effects in Older Adults With Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.老年综合评估驱动干预(GAIN)对癌症老年患者化疗相关毒性的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Oncol. 2021 Nov 1;7(11):e214158. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.4158. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
5
Physiological biomarkers of chronic stress: A systematic review.慢性应激的生理生物标志物:一项系统综述。
Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2021 Sep-Oct;15(5):46-59.
6
Health Equity for Older Adults With Cancer.老年癌症患者的健康公平性。
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Jul 1;39(19):2205-2216. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.00207. Epub 2021 May 27.
7
Epigenetic age acceleration, fatigue, and inflammation in patients undergoing radiation therapy for head and neck cancer: A longitudinal study.头颈部癌症放疗患者的表观遗传年龄加速、疲劳和炎症:一项纵向研究。
Cancer. 2021 Sep 15;127(18):3361-3371. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33641. Epub 2021 May 24.
8
Participation of Black Americans in Cancer Clinical Trials: Current Challenges and Proposed Solutions.美国黑人参与癌症临床试验:当前的挑战与解决方案建议。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2021 May;17(5):265-271. doi: 10.1200/OP.21.00001.
9
Discrimination and Medical Mistrust in a Racially and Ethnically Diverse Sample of California Adults.加利福尼亚州不同种族和民族的成年人样本中的歧视和医疗不信任。
Ann Fam Med. 2021 Jan-Feb;19(1):4-15. doi: 10.1370/afm.2632.
10
Reactivation of dormant tumor cells by modified lipids derived from stress-activated neutrophils.应激激活的中性粒细胞衍生的修饰脂质激活休眠肿瘤细胞
Sci Transl Med. 2020 Dec 2;12(572). doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abb5817.

社会公正与公平:为什么癌症老年患者也应得到关注——一个生命历程的视角。

Social Justice and Equity: Why Older Adults With Cancer Belong-A Life Course Perspective.

机构信息

Division of Supportive Care in Cancer, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY.

James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY.

出版信息

Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2022 Apr;42:1-13. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_349825.

DOI:10.1200/EDBK_349825
PMID:35649203
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11070065/
Abstract

The population of older adults with cancer in the United States is rapidly increasing, which will have a substantial impact on the oncology and public health workforces across the cancer continuum, from prevention to end of life. Unfortunately, inequities in existing social structures that cause increased psychosocial stressors have led to disparities in the incidence of cancer and the morbidity and mortality of cancer for individuals from marginalized backgrounds. It is imperative that older adults, especially those from historically marginalized backgrounds, be adequately represented in all stages of cancer research to address health inequities. Continued efforts and progress toward achieving social justice and health equity require a deeper commitment to and better understanding of the impact of social determinants of health within the cancer domain. Undoubtedly, a more holistic and integrated view that extends beyond the biologic and genetic factors of health must be adopted for health entities to recognize the critical role of environmental, behavioral, and social determinants in cancer health disparities. Against this backdrop, this paper uses a life course approach to present a multifactorial framework for understanding and addressing cancer disparities in an effort to advance social justice and health equity for racially and ethnically diverse older adults.

摘要

美国癌症老年患者人群数量正在迅速增加,这将对肿瘤学和公共卫生领域的工作人员产生重大影响,涵盖癌症防治的各个阶段,从预防到临终关怀。不幸的是,导致心理社会压力增加的现有社会结构中的不平等现象,导致来自边缘化背景的个体的癌症发病率、发病率和死亡率存在差异。至关重要的是,老年人,特别是那些来自历史上处于边缘地位的老年人,应该在癌症研究的所有阶段都得到充分代表,以解决健康不平等问题。要实现社会正义和健康公平,就必须进一步承诺并更好地理解健康领域社会决定因素的影响。毫无疑问,为了使卫生实体认识到环境、行为和社会决定因素在癌症健康差异中的关键作用,必须采取更全面和综合的观点,超越健康的生物和遗传因素。有鉴于此,本文采用生命历程方法提出了一个多因素框架,以努力推进不同种族和族裔的老年群体的社会正义和健康公平,从而理解和解决癌症差异问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f860/11070065/2cc527f716bb/nihms-1979027-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f860/11070065/a81c5c387c7e/nihms-1979027-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f860/11070065/92c5a23181fa/nihms-1979027-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f860/11070065/9c3f21bd9b11/nihms-1979027-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f860/11070065/2cc527f716bb/nihms-1979027-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f860/11070065/a81c5c387c7e/nihms-1979027-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f860/11070065/92c5a23181fa/nihms-1979027-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f860/11070065/9c3f21bd9b11/nihms-1979027-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f860/11070065/2cc527f716bb/nihms-1979027-f0004.jpg