• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

项目隐式国际数据集:跨 34 个国家(2009-2019 年)测量内隐和外显社会群体态度和刻板印象。

The project implicit international dataset: Measuring implicit and explicit social group attitudes and stereotypes across 34 countries (2009-2019).

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 1-347-302-5900, USA.

Department of Psychology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods. 2023 Apr;55(3):1413-1440. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01851-2. Epub 2022 Jun 1.

DOI:10.3758/s13428-022-01851-2
PMID:35650381
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9159648/
Abstract

For decades, researchers across the social sciences have sought to document and explain the worldwide variation in social group attitudes (evaluative representations, e.g., young-good/old-bad) and stereotypes (attribute representations, e.g., male-science/female-arts). Indeed, uncovering such country-level variation can provide key insights into questions ranging from how attitudes and stereotypes are clustered across places to why places vary in attitudes and stereotypes (including ecological and social correlates). Here, we introduce the Project Implicit:International (PI:International) dataset that has the potential to propel such research by offering the first cross-country dataset of both implicit (indirectly measured) and explicit (directly measured) attitudes and stereotypes across multiple topics and years. PI:International comprises 2.3 million tests for seven topics (race, sexual orientation, age, body weight, nationality, and skin-tone attitudes, as well as men/women-science/arts stereotypes) using both indirect (Implicit Association Test; IAT) and direct (self-report) measures collected continuously from 2009 to 2019 from 34 countries in each country's native language(s). We show that the IAT data from PI:International have adequate internal consistency (split-half reliability), convergent validity (implicit-explicit correlations), and known groups validity. Given such reliability and validity, we summarize basic descriptive statistics on the overall strength and variability of implicit and explicit attitudes and stereotypes around the world. The PI:International dataset, including both summary data and trial-level data from the IAT, is provided openly to facilitate wide access and novel discoveries on the global nature of implicit and explicit attitudes and stereotypes.

摘要

几十年来,社会科学领域的研究人员一直致力于记录和解释全球范围内社会群体态度(评价表现,例如,年轻好/年老坏)和刻板印象(属性表现,例如,男性科学/女性艺术)的变化。事实上,揭示这种国家层面的变化可以为从态度和刻板印象如何在不同地方聚集到为什么地方在态度和刻板印象上存在差异(包括生态和社会相关性)等问题提供关键的见解。在这里,我们介绍了“内隐联想测验:国际”(PI:International)数据集,该数据集有可能通过提供关于多个主题和年份的间接(间接测量)和直接(直接测量)态度和刻板印象的第一个跨国数据集来推动此类研究。PI:International 由来自 34 个国家的 230 万项关于七个主题(种族、性取向、年龄、体重、国籍和肤色态度,以及男性/女性-科学/艺术刻板印象)的测试组成,使用间接(内隐联想测验;IAT)和直接(自我报告)测量方法,从 2009 年到 2019 年连续收集。我们表明,PI:International 的 IAT 数据具有足够的内部一致性(半分可靠性)、收敛有效性(内隐-外显相关)和已知群体有效性。鉴于这种可靠性和有效性,我们总结了全球范围内关于内隐和外显态度和刻板印象的总体强度和可变性的基本描述性统计数据。PI:International 数据集包括 IAT 的汇总数据和试验级数据,以开放的方式提供,以促进对全球范围内内隐和外显态度和刻板印象的广泛访问和新发现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7d3/9159648/4fbdaaef65bb/13428_2022_1851_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7d3/9159648/023dda2fa121/13428_2022_1851_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7d3/9159648/aec8b3b26ad9/13428_2022_1851_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7d3/9159648/69cb772cf62b/13428_2022_1851_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7d3/9159648/a5e4e694368a/13428_2022_1851_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7d3/9159648/4fbdaaef65bb/13428_2022_1851_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7d3/9159648/023dda2fa121/13428_2022_1851_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7d3/9159648/aec8b3b26ad9/13428_2022_1851_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7d3/9159648/69cb772cf62b/13428_2022_1851_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7d3/9159648/a5e4e694368a/13428_2022_1851_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7d3/9159648/4fbdaaef65bb/13428_2022_1851_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The project implicit international dataset: Measuring implicit and explicit social group attitudes and stereotypes across 34 countries (2009-2019).项目隐式国际数据集:跨 34 个国家(2009-2019 年)测量内隐和外显社会群体态度和刻板印象。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Apr;55(3):1413-1440. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01851-2. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
2
Implicit and Explicit Attitudes Toward Autistic Adults.对成年自闭症患者的隐性和显性态度。
Autism Adulthood. 2020 Jun 1;2(2):144-151. doi: 10.1089/aut.2019.0023. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
3
Implicit attitudes towards homosexuality: reliability, validity, and controllability of the IAT.对同性恋的隐性态度:内隐联想测验的信度、效度与可控性
Z Exp Psychol. 2001;48(2):145-60. doi: 10.1026//0949-3946.48.2.145.
4
Implicit and Explicit Measurement of Work-Related Age Attitudes and Age Stereotypes.工作相关年龄态度和年龄刻板印象的隐性与显性测量
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 6;11:579155. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.579155. eCollection 2020.
5
Examining adolescent daughters' and their parents' academic-gender stereotypes: Predicting academic attitudes, ability, and STEM intentions.考察青春期少女及其父母的学术性别刻板印象:预测学术态度、能力和 STEM 意向。
J Adolesc. 2021 Dec;93:90-104. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2021.09.010. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
6
Implicit attitudes towards risky driving behaviors: Evidence of validity for the implicit association test.内隐风险驾驶态度:内隐联想测验的有效性证据。
J Safety Res. 2020 Dec;75:284-291. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2020.08.008. Epub 2020 Sep 20.
7
Patterns of Implicit and Explicit Attitudes: IV. Change and Stability From 2007 to 2020.内隐和外显态度的模式:四、2007 年至 2020 年的变化和稳定性。
Psychol Sci. 2022 Sep;33(9):1347-1371. doi: 10.1177/09567976221084257. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
8
Implicit Bias隐性偏见
9
The relationship between implicit intergroup attitudes and beliefs.内隐群体态度与信念之间的关系。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Mar 26;116(13):5862-5871. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1820240116. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
10
Physician implicit attitudes and stereotypes about race and quality of medical care.医生对种族和医疗质量的隐性态度与刻板印象。
Med Care. 2008 Jul;46(7):678-85. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181653d58.

引用本文的文献

1
Neuroscientific Analysis of Logo Design: Implications for Luxury Brand Marketing.标志设计的神经科学分析:对奢侈品牌营销的启示
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Apr 9;15(4):502. doi: 10.3390/bs15040502.
2
The Impact of Novel Medications for Obesity on Weight Stigma and Societal Attitudes: A Narrative Review.新型肥胖药物对体重歧视和社会态度的影响:一项叙述性综述。
Curr Obes Rep. 2025 Feb 5;14(1):18. doi: 10.1007/s13679-025-00611-5.
3
Who is American? A comprehensive analysis of the American = White/Foreign = Asian stereotype (2007-2023).

本文引用的文献

1
Patterns of implicit and explicit attitudes II. Long-term change and stability, regardless of group membership.内隐和外显态度的模式 II. 无论群体归属如何,长期变化和稳定性。
Am Psychol. 2021 Sep;76(6):851-869. doi: 10.1037/amp0000810.
2
Little Between-Region and Between-Country Variance When People Form Impressions of Others.人们对他人形成印象时,地区间和国家间差异不大。
Psychol Sci. 2021 Dec;32(12):1907-1917. doi: 10.1177/09567976211019950. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
3
Critique of the Bias-of-Crowds Model Simply Restates the Model: Reply to Connor and Evers (2020).
谁是美国人?对“美国人 = 白人/外国人 = 亚洲人”刻板印象的全面分析(2007 - 2023年)
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 27;15(1):3368. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83794-6.
4
ChatGPT as Research Scientist: Probing GPT's capabilities as a Research Librarian, Research Ethicist, Data Generator, and Data Predictor.ChatGPT 作为研究科学家:探究 GPT 在研究馆员、研究伦理学家、数据生成器和数据预测者方面的能力。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Aug 27;121(35):e2404328121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2404328121. Epub 2024 Aug 20.
5
Awareness of implicit attitudes: Large-scale investigations of mechanism and scope.内隐态度的意识:机制和范围的大规模调查。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Dec;152(12):3311-3343. doi: 10.1037/xge0001464. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
6
Structural transphobia is associated with psychological distress and suicidality in a large national sample of transgender adults.在一个全国性的跨性别成年人大型样本中,结构性恐跨症与心理困扰和自杀倾向有关。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2024 Feb;59(2):285-294. doi: 10.1007/s00127-023-02482-4. Epub 2023 May 10.
7
Community-level age bias and older adult mortality.社区层面的年龄歧视与老年人口死亡率。
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Jan;317:115449. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115449. Epub 2022 Nov 21.
8
Bias among managers: Its prevalence across a decade and comparison across occupations.管理者中的偏见:十年间的普遍程度及不同职业间的比较。
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 11;13:1034712. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1034712. eCollection 2022.
9
Implicit and explicit racial prejudice and stereotyping toward Black (vs. White) Americans: The prevalence and variation among genetic counselors in North America.对美国黑人(与白人相比)的内隐和外显种族偏见和刻板印象:北美的遗传咨询师中的流行程度和变化。
J Genet Couns. 2023 Apr;32(2):397-410. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1648. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
对群体偏见模型的批判只是重申了该模型:对康纳和埃弗斯(2020年)的回应。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2022 Mar;17(2):606-610. doi: 10.1177/1745691621997394. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
4
Cross-Cultural Comparisons in Implicit and Explicit Age Bias.内隐和外显年龄偏见的跨文化比较
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2021 Jun;47(6):953-968. doi: 10.1177/0146167220950070. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
5
Gender stereotypes are reflected in the distributional structure of 25 languages.性别刻板印象反映在 25 种语言的分布结构中。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Oct;4(10):1021-1028. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0918-6. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
6
The Bias of Individuals (in Crowds): Why Implicit Bias Is Probably a Noisily Measured Individual-Level Construct.个体(在群体中)的偏差:为何内隐偏差可能是一个测量存在噪声的个体层面的构念。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2020 Nov;15(6):1329-1345. doi: 10.1177/1745691620931492. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
7
Can the Implicit Association Test Serve as a Valid Measure of Automatic Cognition? A Response to Schimmack (2021).内隐联想测验能否作为自动认知的有效测量手段?——回应施马克(2021)。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2021 Mar;16(2):422-434. doi: 10.1177/1745691620904080. Epub 2020 May 6.
8
Can the Implicit Association Test Measure Automatic Judgment? The Validation Continues.内隐联想测验能否测量自动判断?验证仍在继续。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2021 Mar;16(2):415-421. doi: 10.1177/1745691619897960. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
9
Establishing construct validity evidence for regional measures of explicit and implicit racial bias.建立区域明确和隐性种族偏见的结构有效性证据。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019 Jun;148(6):1022-1040. doi: 10.1037/xge0000623.
10
Historical roots of implicit bias in slavery.奴隶制中隐性偏见的历史根源。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Jun 11;116(24):11693-11698. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1818816116. Epub 2019 May 28.