The University of Edinburgh, Usher Institute, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Keele University, School of Social, Political and Global Studies and School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele, United Kingdom.
Yearb Med Inform. 2022 Aug;31(1):33-39. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1742498. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
Patient portals are increasingly implemented to improve patient involvement and engagement. We here seek to provide an overview of ways to mitigate existing concerns that these technologies increase inequity and bias and do not reach those who could benefit most from them.
Based on the current literature, we review the limitations of existing evaluations of patient portals in relation to addressing health equity, literacy and bias; outline challenges evaluators face when conducting such evaluations; and suggest methodological approaches that may address existing shortcomings.
Various stakeholder needs should be addressed before deploying patient portals, involving vulnerable groups in user-centred design, and studying unanticipated consequences and impacts of information systems in use over time.
Formative approaches to evaluation can help to address existing shortcomings and facilitate the development and implementation of patient portals in an equitable way thereby promoting the creation of resilient health systems.
患者门户的应用日益普及,旨在提高患者的参与度和积极性。本研究旨在提供一种方法,以减轻人们对这些技术会加剧不平等和偏见、以及无法覆盖最受益人群的担忧。
基于现有文献,我们综述了现有患者门户评估在解决健康公平、文化程度和偏见方面的局限性;概述了评估者在进行此类评估时面临的挑战;并提出了可能解决现有缺陷的方法学方法。
在部署患者门户之前,应满足各种利益相关者的需求,包括让弱势群体参与以患者为中心的设计,以及随着时间的推移研究信息系统使用中出现的意外后果和影响。
评估的形成方法可以帮助解决现有缺陷,并以公平的方式促进患者门户的开发和实施,从而促进有弹性的卫生系统的创建。