Suppr超能文献

印度是否应该向车辆电动化转型?评估印度替代燃料和传统燃料汽车的生命周期温室气体和标准空气污染物排放。

Should India Move toward Vehicle Electrification? Assessing Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas and Criteria Air Pollutant Emissions of Alternative and Conventional Fuel Vehicles in India.

机构信息

Department of Energy Resources Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United States.

Department of Engineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States.

出版信息

Environ Sci Technol. 2022 Jul 5;56(13):9569-9582. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c07718. Epub 2022 Jun 13.

Abstract

We perform a state-specific life-cycle assessment of greenhouse gases (GHG) (CO) and sulfur dioxide (SO) emissions in India for representative passenger vehicles (two-wheelers, three-wheelers, four-wheelers, and buses) and technologies (internal combustion engine, battery electric, hybrid electric, and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles). We find that in most states, four-wheeler battery-electric vehicles (BEVs) have higher GHG and SO emissions than other conventional or alternative vehicles. Electrification of those vehicle classes under present conditions would not lead to emission reductions. Electrified buses and three-wheelers are the best strategies to reduce GHG emissions in many states, but they are also the worst strategy in terms of SO emissions. Electrified two-wheelers have lower SO emissions than gasoline in one state. The Indian grid would need to decrease its carbon dioxide emissions by 38-52% and SO emissions by 58-97% (depending on the state) for widespread vehicle electrification for sustainability purposes to make sense. If the 2030 goals for India under the Glasgow COP are met, we find that four-wheeler BEVs still have higher GHG emissions in 18 states compared to a conventional gasoline compact four wheeler, and all states will have higher SO emissions for BEVs across all vehicle types compared to their conventional counterparts.

摘要

我们对印度代表性乘用车(两轮车、三轮车、四轮车和公共汽车)和技术(内燃机、电池电动汽车、混合动力电动汽车和插电式混合动力电动汽车)的温室气体(GHG)(CO)和二氧化硫(SO)排放进行了特定州的生命周期评估。我们发现,在大多数州,四轮车电池电动汽车(BEV)的 GHG 和 SO 排放高于其他传统或替代车辆。在当前条件下,这些车辆类别的电气化不会导致排放量减少。在许多州,电动巴士和三轮车是减少 GHG 排放的最佳策略,但在 SO 排放方面却是最差的策略。在一个州,电动两轮车的 SO 排放量低于汽油。为了实现可持续性目的,广泛推广车辆电气化,印度电网需要将其二氧化碳排放量减少 38-52%,将 SO 排放量减少 58-97%(取决于州)。如果印度在格拉斯哥 COP 下实现了 2030 年的目标,我们发现,与传统汽油紧凑型四轮车相比,18 个州的四轮 BEV 仍具有更高的 GHG 排放,而与传统车辆相比,所有州的所有车辆类型的 BEV 都将具有更高的 SO 排放。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验