Center for Health and Exercise Science Research, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, China.
Department of Sport, Physical Education and Health, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, China.
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jun 15;22(1):1201. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13585-z.
The purpose of this review was to synthesize the empirical evidence of relevant studies related to preventive behaviors in response to the COVID-19 pandemic among children and adolescents. Further to this, we aimed to identify the demographic, psychological, and social and environmental correlates of such behaviors.
Following PRISMA guidelines, eligible literature was identified by searching seven databases (PsycINFO, PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, PROSPERO registry platform, and ClinicalTrials.gov website) and reference list of included studies and relevant review papers from 1 Jan 2020 to 28 Feb 2021. The standardized mean difference and correlation coefficients r were extracted to estimate the effect sizes. Analyses were conducted using R software.
Of the 35,271 original papers, 23 eligible studies were included in the qualitative synthesis and all these studies were of moderate-to-high quality, of which 17 studies were further included into the quantitative analysis. Children and adolescents (6-20 yrs.) showed a poorer practice of COVID-19 preventive behaviors compared to younger adults (21-59 yrs.) with a small-to-medium effect size (SMD = -.25, 95%CI = -.41 to -.09). For the demographic correlates, children and adolescents' COVID-19 preventive practice was found to be significantly associated with gender (r = .14, 95%CI = .10 to .18), while not with age (r = -.02, 95%CI = -.14 to .10). Narratively, knowledge was found to be consistently and significantly correlated. For the psychological correlates, small-to-medium overall effects were identified for the association with attitudes (r = .26, 95%CI = .21 to .31) and perceived severity (r = .16, 95%CI = .01 to .30). For the family and social correlates, a non-significant association was identified between family economic status and COVID-19 preventive behaviors (r = .004, 95%CI = -.12 to .12).
Interventions and relevant policies of promoting children and adolescent's preventive measures should be a priority. Further, empirical studies identifying the demographic, psychological, and family and social correlates of children and adolescents' preventive behaviors are needed.
本综述旨在综合有关儿童和青少年应对 COVID-19 大流行的预防行为的相关研究的实证证据。此外,我们旨在确定这些行为的人口统计学、心理、社会和环境相关性。
根据 PRISMA 指南,通过搜索七个数据库(PsycINFO、PubMed、MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane 图书馆、PROSPERO 注册平台和 ClinicalTrials.gov 网站)和纳入研究的参考文献列表以及相关综述论文,从 2020 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 2 月 28 日确定了符合条件的文献。提取标准化均数差和相关系数 r 以估计效应大小。使用 R 软件进行分析。
在最初的 35,271 篇论文中,有 23 篇符合条件的研究纳入了定性综合分析,所有这些研究的质量均为中高度,其中 17 项研究进一步纳入了定量分析。与年轻成年人(21-59 岁)相比,儿童和青少年(6-20 岁)的 COVID-19 预防行为较差,其效应量为小至中等(SMD=-0.25,95%CI=-0.41 至-.09)。在人口统计学相关性方面,发现儿童和青少年的 COVID-19 预防实践与性别显著相关(r=0.14,95%CI=0.10 至.18),而与年龄无关(r=-0.02,95%CI=-0.14 至.10)。叙述性地,发现知识始终与态度显著相关。在心理相关性方面,发现与态度(r=0.26,95%CI=0.21 至.31)和感知严重程度(r=0.16,95%CI=0.01 至.30)的关联存在小到中等的总体效应。在家庭和社会相关性方面,家庭经济状况与 COVID-19 预防行为之间的相关性无统计学意义(r=0.004,95%CI=-0.12 至.12)。
应优先考虑促进儿童和青少年预防措施的干预措施和相关政策。此外,还需要进行实证研究,以确定儿童和青少年预防行为的人口统计学、心理、家庭和社会相关性。