Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Addiction Sciences Division, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Department of Psychology, The University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2022 Aug;46(8):1525-1538. doi: 10.1111/acer.14887. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
The association between behavioral economic demand and various alcohol use outcomes is well established. However, few studies have examined whether changes in demand occur following a brief alcohol intervention (BAI), and whether this change predicts alcohol outcomes over the long term.
Parallel process piecewise latent growth curve models were examined in a sample of 393 heavy drinking emerging adults (60.8% women; 85.2% white; M = 18.77). In these models, two linear slopes represented rates of change in alcohol use, heavy drinking episodes, alcohol-related problems, and demand (intensity and highest expenditure across all price points or O ) from baseline to 1 month (slope 1) and 1 month to 16 months (slope 2). Mediation analyses were conducted to estimate the effect of a BAI on 16-month alcohol outcomes through slope 1 demand.
A two-session BAI predicted significant reductions in all five outcomes from baseline to 1-month follow-up. Although no further reduction was observed from the 1-month to the 16-month follow-up, there was no regression to baseline levels. Slope 1 demand intensity, but not O , significantly mediated the association between BAI and both outcomes-heavy drinking episodes (Est. = -0.23, SE = 0.08, p < 0.01) and alcohol-related problems (Est. = -0.15, SE = 0.07, p < 0.05)-at the 16-month follow-up.
Reducing high valuation of alcohol among heavy drinking emerging adults within the first month following BAI is critical for the long-term efficacy of the intervention. A two-session BAI was associated with enduring reductions in alcohol demand, and the change in demand intensity, but not O , was associated with sustained reductions in heavy drinking and alcohol-related problems.
行为经济学需求与各种酒精使用结果之间的关联已得到充分证实。然而,很少有研究检查在简短的酒精干预(BAI)之后需求是否会发生变化,以及这种变化是否可以长期预测酒精结果。
在 393 名重度饮酒的年轻成年人(60.8%女性;85.2%白人;M = 18.77)的样本中,同时检验了平行过程分段潜在增长曲线模型。在这些模型中,两条线性斜率代表了从基线到 1 个月(斜率 1)和 1 个月到 16 个月(斜率 2)期间酒精使用量、重度饮酒发作、与酒精相关的问题和需求(所有价格点的强度和最高支出或 O )的变化率。进行中介分析以通过斜率 1 的需求来估计 BAI 对 16 个月酒精结果的影响。
两阶段 BAI 预测从基线到 1 个月随访时所有五个结果均显著降低。尽管从 1 个月到 16 个月的随访中没有观察到进一步的减少,但没有回归到基线水平。斜率 1 的需求强度,但不是 O ,在 BAI 与两个结果(重度饮酒发作(Est. = -0.23,SE = 0.08,p <0.01)和与酒精相关的问题(Est. = -0.15,SE = 0.07,p <0.05))之间的关联中具有显著的中介作用。
在 BAI 后第一个月内减少重度饮酒的年轻成年人对酒精的高估值对于干预的长期效果至关重要。两阶段 BAI 与酒精需求的持久减少相关,而需求强度的变化,而不是 O ,与持续减少重度饮酒和与酒精相关的问题相关。