Wang Jia-Qing, Zhang Yuan, Pang Min, Wang Yue-Qiu, Yuan Jun, Peng Hui, Zhang Wen, Dai Lu, Li Hong-Wei
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The Affiliated Stomatological Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, Nanjing, China.
Front Genet. 2022 Jun 13;13:915679. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.915679. eCollection 2022.
Taper implants differ greatly from anatomical teeth in shape. In this study, seven three-dimensional finite element models were established, including a conventional taper implant and six root-analog implants with different root numbers and shapes. Vertical, horizontal, and oblique instantaneous loads of 100 N were applied to the models to obtain stress distribution in the implant, mucosa, cortical bone, and cancellous bone. ANSYS was used to perform the analysis under hypothetical experimental conditions. We find the stresses in all the implants and surrounding tissues varied by loading direction, the sequence of stress magnitude is vertical load, oblique load, and then horizontal load. The maximum stress values in root-analog implants were significantly less than in the taper implant. Moreover, stress distribution in the former was equalized contrary to the concentrated stress in the latter. Root-analog implants with different root geometry also revealed a pattern: stresses in multiple-root implant models were lower than those in single-root implants under the same load. The implant with a long and rounded root distributed the stress more uniformly, and it was mainly concentrated on the implant itself and cancellous bone. However, the opposite effect was observed in the short implant on mucosa and cortical bone. The root geometry of anatomical teeth can modify their functions. A uniform-shaped implant can hardly meet their functional requirements. Thus, the root-analog implant could be a possible solution.
锥形种植体在形状上与天然牙有很大不同。在本研究中,建立了七个三维有限元模型,包括一个传统锥形种植体和六个具有不同牙根数量和形状的牙根模拟种植体。对模型施加100 N的垂直、水平和斜向瞬时载荷,以获得种植体、黏膜、皮质骨和松质骨中的应力分布。在假设的实验条件下,使用ANSYS进行分析。我们发现,所有种植体及其周围组织中的应力随加载方向而变化,应力大小顺序为垂直载荷、斜向载荷,然后是水平载荷。牙根模拟种植体中的最大应力值明显低于锥形种植体。此外,前者的应力分布均匀,而后者的应力集中。具有不同牙根几何形状的牙根模拟种植体也呈现出一种模式:在相同载荷下,多根种植体模型中的应力低于单根种植体。具有长而圆的牙根的种植体应力分布更均匀,且主要集中在种植体本身和松质骨上。然而,短种植体对黏膜和皮质骨的影响则相反。天然牙的牙根几何形状可以改变其功能。形状统一的种植体很难满足其功能需求。因此,牙根模拟种植体可能是一种解决方案。