• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过有限元分析对六种不同牙根模拟种植体与传统莫氏锥度种植体进行生物力学比较

Biomechanical Comparison of Six Different Root-Analog Implants and the Conventional Morse Taper Implant by Finite Element Analysis.

作者信息

Wang Jia-Qing, Zhang Yuan, Pang Min, Wang Yue-Qiu, Yuan Jun, Peng Hui, Zhang Wen, Dai Lu, Li Hong-Wei

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The Affiliated Stomatological Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

Front Genet. 2022 Jun 13;13:915679. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.915679. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fgene.2022.915679
PMID:35769992
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9234945/
Abstract

Taper implants differ greatly from anatomical teeth in shape. In this study, seven three-dimensional finite element models were established, including a conventional taper implant and six root-analog implants with different root numbers and shapes. Vertical, horizontal, and oblique instantaneous loads of 100 N were applied to the models to obtain stress distribution in the implant, mucosa, cortical bone, and cancellous bone. ANSYS was used to perform the analysis under hypothetical experimental conditions. We find the stresses in all the implants and surrounding tissues varied by loading direction, the sequence of stress magnitude is vertical load, oblique load, and then horizontal load. The maximum stress values in root-analog implants were significantly less than in the taper implant. Moreover, stress distribution in the former was equalized contrary to the concentrated stress in the latter. Root-analog implants with different root geometry also revealed a pattern: stresses in multiple-root implant models were lower than those in single-root implants under the same load. The implant with a long and rounded root distributed the stress more uniformly, and it was mainly concentrated on the implant itself and cancellous bone. However, the opposite effect was observed in the short implant on mucosa and cortical bone. The root geometry of anatomical teeth can modify their functions. A uniform-shaped implant can hardly meet their functional requirements. Thus, the root-analog implant could be a possible solution.

摘要

锥形种植体在形状上与天然牙有很大不同。在本研究中,建立了七个三维有限元模型,包括一个传统锥形种植体和六个具有不同牙根数量和形状的牙根模拟种植体。对模型施加100 N的垂直、水平和斜向瞬时载荷,以获得种植体、黏膜、皮质骨和松质骨中的应力分布。在假设的实验条件下,使用ANSYS进行分析。我们发现,所有种植体及其周围组织中的应力随加载方向而变化,应力大小顺序为垂直载荷、斜向载荷,然后是水平载荷。牙根模拟种植体中的最大应力值明显低于锥形种植体。此外,前者的应力分布均匀,而后者的应力集中。具有不同牙根几何形状的牙根模拟种植体也呈现出一种模式:在相同载荷下,多根种植体模型中的应力低于单根种植体。具有长而圆的牙根的种植体应力分布更均匀,且主要集中在种植体本身和松质骨上。然而,短种植体对黏膜和皮质骨的影响则相反。天然牙的牙根几何形状可以改变其功能。形状统一的种植体很难满足其功能需求。因此,牙根模拟种植体可能是一种解决方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f934/9234945/06f0a5acfc1c/fgene-13-915679-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f934/9234945/6242e291af71/fgene-13-915679-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f934/9234945/079c5aee4f9c/fgene-13-915679-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f934/9234945/d0cab8d4fbb4/fgene-13-915679-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f934/9234945/0b0d5f0ccb37/fgene-13-915679-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f934/9234945/1f8cf69596ec/fgene-13-915679-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f934/9234945/5233248b0ea8/fgene-13-915679-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f934/9234945/94da89d4b799/fgene-13-915679-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f934/9234945/06f0a5acfc1c/fgene-13-915679-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f934/9234945/6242e291af71/fgene-13-915679-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f934/9234945/079c5aee4f9c/fgene-13-915679-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f934/9234945/d0cab8d4fbb4/fgene-13-915679-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f934/9234945/0b0d5f0ccb37/fgene-13-915679-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f934/9234945/1f8cf69596ec/fgene-13-915679-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f934/9234945/5233248b0ea8/fgene-13-915679-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f934/9234945/94da89d4b799/fgene-13-915679-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f934/9234945/06f0a5acfc1c/fgene-13-915679-g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Biomechanical Comparison of Six Different Root-Analog Implants and the Conventional Morse Taper Implant by Finite Element Analysis.通过有限元分析对六种不同牙根模拟种植体与传统莫氏锥度种植体进行生物力学比较
Front Genet. 2022 Jun 13;13:915679. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.915679. eCollection 2022.
2
Finite element analysis of peri-implant bone volume affected by stresses around Morse taper implants: effects of implant positioning to the bone crest.莫氏锥度种植体周围应力对种植体周围骨体积的有限元分析:种植体相对于牙槽嵴顶位置的影响
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2018 Sep;21(12):655-662. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2018.1507025.
3
Finite element analysis of stress extent at peri-implant bone surrounding external hexagon or Morse taper implants.外六角或莫氏锥度种植体周围种植体周围骨应力范围的有限元分析。
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017 Jul;71:441-447. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.03.011. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
4
[Influence of thread shapes of custommade root-analogue implants on stress distribution of peri-implant bone: A three-dimensional finite element analysis].[定制牙根模拟种植体螺纹形状对种植体周围骨应力分布的影响:三维有限元分析]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2019 Dec 18;51(6):1130-1137. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2019.06.027.
5
Evaluation of optimal taper of immediately loaded wide-diameter implants: a finite element analysis.即刻负重宽直径种植体最佳锥度的评估:有限元分析
J Oral Implantol. 2013 Apr;39(2):123-32. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00104. Epub 2011 Sep 9.
6
Evaluation of Platform Switching on Crestal Bone Stress in Tapered and Cylindrical Implants: A Finite Element Analysis.平台转换对锥形和圆柱形种植体嵴骨应力影响的评估:有限元分析
J Int Acad Periodontol. 2015 Jan;17(1):2-13.
7
Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the stress distribution on morse taper implants surface.莫氏锥度种植体表面应力分布的三维有限元分析
J Prosthodont Res. 2013 Jul;57(3):206-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2013.02.003. Epub 2013 Jun 15.
8
[Three dimensional finite element analysis of biomechanical distribution of dental implants with immediate loading].即刻负重种植体生物力学分布的三维有限元分析
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2011 Apr;29(2):121-4.
9
[Three-dimensional finite element analysis of four-implants supported mandibular overdentures using two different attachments].使用两种不同附着体的四颗种植体支持的下颌覆盖义齿的三维有限元分析
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019 Jan 9;54(1):41-45. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1002-0098.2019.01.008.
10
Comparative Evaluation of Implant Designs: Influence of Diameter, Length, and Taper on Stress and Strain in the Mandibular Segment-A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.种植体设计的比较评估:直径、长度和锥度对下颌骨段应力和应变的影响——三维有限元分析
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2019 May;11(Suppl 2):S347-S354. doi: 10.4103/JPBS.JPBS_29_19.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical challenges of biomechanical performance of narrow-diameter implants in maxillary posterior teeth in aging patients: A finite element analysis.老年患者上颌后牙应用小直径种植体的生物力学性能的临床挑战:有限元分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 25;19(3):e0299816. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299816. eCollection 2024.
2
Parametric Design of Porous Structure and Optimal Porosity Gradient Distribution Based on Root-Shaped Implants.基于根形种植体的多孔结构参数化设计及最佳孔隙率梯度分布
Materials (Basel). 2024 Feb 29;17(5):1137. doi: 10.3390/ma17051137.
3
The optimal design and three-dimensional finite element analysis of CAD/CAM integrated roach attachment.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of peri-implant bone resorption on mechanical stress in the implant body: In vivo measured load-based finite element analysis.种植体周围骨吸收对种植体体部机械应力的影响:基于体内测量的负载有限元分析。
J Oral Rehabil. 2020 Dec;47(12):1566-1573. doi: 10.1111/joor.13097. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
2
Finite element analysis of individual taenioglossan radular teeth (Mollusca).舌齿亚目单个齿舌齿(软体动物)的有限元分析
Acta Biomater. 2020 Oct 1;115:317-332. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.08.034. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
3
Effect of Different Implant Designs on Strain and Stress Distribution under Non-Axial Loading: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
CAD/CAM一体化蟑螂附着体的优化设计及三维有限元分析
Heliyon. 2023 Dec 16;10(1):e23283. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23283. eCollection 2024 Jan 15.
不同种植体设计在非轴向载荷下对应变和应力分布的影响:三维有限元分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 1;17(13):4738. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17134738.
4
In silico evaluation of the stress fields on the cortical bone surrounding dental implants: Comparing root-analogue and screwed implants.牙科种植体周围皮质骨应力场的计算机模拟评估:根形模拟种植体与螺纹种植体的比较
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2020 Apr;104:103667. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103667. Epub 2020 Feb 2.
5
Relationships of Stresses on Alveolar Bone and Abutment of Dental Implant from Various Bite Forces by Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.三维有限元分析不同咬合力对种植体牙槽骨及基台的应力关系。
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Feb 19;2020:7539628. doi: 10.1155/2020/7539628. eCollection 2020.
6
Finite element analysis and experimental evaluation on stress distribution and sensitivity of dental implants to assess optimum length and thread pitch.有限元分析及实验评估在应力分布和敏感性的牙科植入物评估最佳长度和螺纹间距。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020 Apr;187:105258. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.105258. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
7
Historical development of root analogue implants: a review of published papers.牙根模拟种植体的历史发展:已发表论文综述
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Jul;57(6):496-504. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2019.01.021. Epub 2019 May 11.
8
Puncture-and-Pull Biomechanics in the Teeth of Predatory Coelurosaurian Dinosaurs.捕食性腔骨龙类恐龙牙齿的刺穿-拔出生物力学
Curr Biol. 2018 May 7;28(9):1467-1474.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.03.042. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
9
Evo-devo models of tooth development and the origin of hominoid molar diversity.牙发育的进化发育模型与类人猿磨牙多样性的起源。
Sci Adv. 2018 Apr 11;4(4):eaar2334. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aar2334. eCollection 2018 Apr.
10
Irregular Implant Design Decreases Periimplant Stress and Strain Under Oblique Loading.不规则种植体设计可降低倾斜加载下种植体周围的应力和应变。
Implant Dent. 2017 Oct;26(5):744-750. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000662.