• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

迈向一种用于评估烧伤瘢痕柔韧性的装置的研发。

Towards the Development of a Device for Assessing the Pliability of Burn Scars.

作者信息

Dalle Mura Francesco, Governi Lapo, Furferi Rocco, Cervo Marta, Puggelli Luca

机构信息

Department of Industrial Technology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Meyer Children's Hospital, Florence, Italy.

出版信息

Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Jun 20;10:856562. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.856562. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fbioe.2022.856562
PMID:35795161
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9250968/
Abstract

Burn injuries requires post-accident medical treatment. However, the treatment of burns does not end with first aid because scarred skin must be managed for many years, and in some circumstances, for life. The methods used to evaluate the state of a burn scar based, for instance, on Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale or similar ones, often lacks in univocally assessing the scarred skin's state of health. As a result, the primary aim of this research is to design and build a prototype that can support the doctor during scar assessment, and eventually therapy, by providing objective information on the state of the lesion, particularly the value of skin pliability. The developed tool is based on the depressomassage treatment probe named LPG, currently used to treat burn scars in a number of hospitals. It consists of a non-invasive massage technique using a mechanical device to suction and mobilize scar tissue and is used as a post-operative treatment to speed up the healing process to make the mark of the scar less visible. The prototype is specifically designed to be manufactured using Additive Manufacturing and was validated comparing its performances against the ones of a certified instrument (i.e., the Romer Absolute ARM with RS1 probe). Validation was carried out by designing and developing a tool to put the RS1 probe in the same measurement conditions of the new prototype probe. Tests performed to assess the performance of the devised prototype show that the probe developed in this work is able to provide measurements with a sufficient degree of accuracy (maximum error ±0.1 mm) to be adopted for a reliable estimation of the pliability value in a hospital environment.

摘要

烧伤需要事故后的医疗救治。然而,烧伤治疗并不以急救结束,因为瘢痕皮肤必须管理多年,在某些情况下甚至是终身管理。例如,基于患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表或类似量表来评估烧伤瘢痕状态的方法,往往缺乏对瘢痕皮肤健康状况的明确评估。因此,本研究的主要目的是设计并构建一个原型,在瘢痕评估乃至治疗过程中为医生提供支持,通过提供关于病变状态的客观信息,特别是皮肤柔韧性的值。所开发的工具基于名为LPG的减压按摩治疗探头,目前多家医院用其治疗烧伤瘢痕。它由一种非侵入性按摩技术组成,使用机械设备对瘢痕组织进行抽吸和移动,并用作术后治疗以加速愈合过程,使瘢痕印记不那么明显。该原型专门设计为使用增材制造进行制造,并通过将其性能与经过认证的仪器(即配备RS1探头的罗默绝对ARM)的性能进行比较来进行验证。通过设计和开发一种工具来使RS1探头处于与新原型探头相同的测量条件下进行验证。为评估所设计原型的性能而进行的测试表明,本研究中开发的探头能够提供足够准确的测量值(最大误差±0.1毫米),可用于在医院环境中可靠估计柔韧性值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb1c/9250968/7d008a92f5dc/fbioe-10-856562-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb1c/9250968/935264a42d1c/fbioe-10-856562-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb1c/9250968/347d450bb131/fbioe-10-856562-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb1c/9250968/f6b4741a544a/fbioe-10-856562-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb1c/9250968/f91afb24e43e/fbioe-10-856562-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb1c/9250968/d0474373f29f/fbioe-10-856562-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb1c/9250968/aa2d49b95030/fbioe-10-856562-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb1c/9250968/48e0a3adfa38/fbioe-10-856562-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb1c/9250968/944c73b44396/fbioe-10-856562-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb1c/9250968/2fc4ce72af79/fbioe-10-856562-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb1c/9250968/7d008a92f5dc/fbioe-10-856562-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb1c/9250968/935264a42d1c/fbioe-10-856562-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb1c/9250968/347d450bb131/fbioe-10-856562-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb1c/9250968/f6b4741a544a/fbioe-10-856562-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb1c/9250968/f91afb24e43e/fbioe-10-856562-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb1c/9250968/d0474373f29f/fbioe-10-856562-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb1c/9250968/aa2d49b95030/fbioe-10-856562-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb1c/9250968/48e0a3adfa38/fbioe-10-856562-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb1c/9250968/944c73b44396/fbioe-10-856562-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb1c/9250968/2fc4ce72af79/fbioe-10-856562-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb1c/9250968/7d008a92f5dc/fbioe-10-856562-g010.jpg

相似文献

1
Towards the Development of a Device for Assessing the Pliability of Burn Scars.迈向一种用于评估烧伤瘢痕柔韧性的装置的研发。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Jun 20;10:856562. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.856562. eCollection 2022.
2
Objective assessment of burn scar vascularity, erythema, pliability, thickness, and planimetry.烧伤瘢痕血管分布、红斑、柔韧性、厚度及面积的客观评估。
Dermatol Surg. 2005 Jan;31(1):48-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2005.31004.
3
Influence on clinical parameters of depressomassage (part I): The effects of depressomassage on color and transepidermal water loss rate in burn scars: A pilot comparative controlled study.减压按摩对临床参数的影响(第一部分):减压按摩对烧伤瘢痕颜色和经表皮水分流失率的影响:一项初步比较对照研究。
Burns. 2018 Jun;44(4):877-885. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2017.11.004. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
4
Case study: Pilot testing of a local acupuncture intervention protocol for burn scars.案例研究:针对烧伤疤痕的局部针灸干预方案的试点测试
Scars Burn Heal. 2022 Feb 23;8:20595131211058430. doi: 10.1177/20595131211058430. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
5
An effective procedure for skin stiffness measurement to improve Paediatric Burn Care.一种有效的皮肤硬度测量方法,以改善小儿烧伤护理。
Burns. 2019 Aug;45(5):1102-1111. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
6
[Clinical effects of sequential laser treatments on early stage hypertrophic burn scars].序贯激光治疗对早期增生性烧伤瘢痕的临床疗效
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2018 Sep 20;34(9):615-623. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2018.09.011.
7
Tissue tonometry is a simple, objective measure for pliability of burn scar: is it reliable?组织张力测量法是一种用于评估烧伤瘢痕柔韧性的简单、客观的方法:它可靠吗?
J Burn Care Res. 2006 Jan-Feb;27(1):82-5. doi: 10.1097/01.bcr.0000194531.93753.c5.
8
Burn scar assessment: a systematic review of different scar scales.烧伤瘢痕评估:不同瘢痕量表的系统评价。
J Surg Res. 2010 Nov;164(1):e115-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2010.05.056. Epub 2010 Jun 16.
9
Rating the burn scar.评定烧伤瘢痕。
J Burn Care Rehabil. 1990 May-Jun;11(3):256-60. doi: 10.1097/00004630-199005000-00014.
10
Scar massage for hypertrophic burns scarring-A systematic review.肥厚性烧伤瘢痕的瘢痕按摩——一项系统评价
Burns. 2018 Feb;44(1):24-38. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2017.05.006. Epub 2017 Jun 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Study of Rh-bFGF Combined With Collagen Sponge in the Treatment of Maxillofacial Deep Ⅱ Degree Burn.重组人碱性成纤维细胞生长因子联合胶原海绵治疗颌面部深Ⅱ度烧伤的临床研究
J Craniofac Surg. 2024 Feb 26;35(3):e268-71. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000010023.

本文引用的文献

1
Correlation between elastic modulus and clinical severity of pathological scars: a cross-sectional study.弹性模量与病理性瘢痕临床严重程度的相关性:一项横断面研究。
Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 2;11(1):23324. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02730-0.
2
Scar Assessment Tools: How Do They Compare?疤痕评估工具:它们如何比较?
Front Surg. 2021 Jun 23;8:643098. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.643098. eCollection 2021.
3
The Correlation Between Quality of Life and Acceptability of Disability in Patients With Facial Burn Scars.面部烧伤瘢痕患者生活质量与残疾接受度之间的相关性
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2019 Nov 14;7:329. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00329. eCollection 2019.
4
EEMCO Guidance for the in vivo Assessment of Biomechanical Properties of the Human Skin and Its Annexes: Revisiting Instrumentation and Test Modes.EEMCO 指导原则:人体皮肤及其附属物生物力学特性的体内评估:重新审视仪器和测试模式。
Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2020;33(1):44-60. doi: 10.1159/000504063. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
5
An effective procedure for skin stiffness measurement to improve Paediatric Burn Care.一种有效的皮肤硬度测量方法,以改善小儿烧伤护理。
Burns. 2019 Aug;45(5):1102-1111. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
6
Burn Scar Evaluation Using the Cutometer® MPA 580 in Comparison to "Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale" and "Vancouver Scar Scale".使用Cutometer® MPA 580评估烧伤疤痕,并与“患者和观察者疤痕评估量表”及“温哥华疤痕量表”进行比较。
J Burn Care Res. 2018 Jun 13;39(4):516-526. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irx009.
7
The physical and physiological effects of vacuum massage on the different skin layers: a current status of the literature.真空按摩对不同皮肤层的物理和生理影响:文献现状。
Burns Trauma. 2016 Sep 19;4:34. doi: 10.1186/s41038-016-0053-9. eCollection 2016.
8
Evaluation of a Silicone Membrane as an Alternative to Human Skin for Determining Skin Permeation Parameters of Chemical Compounds.评估硅酮膜作为人皮替代品用于测定化合物皮肤渗透参数的性能。
Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo). 2016;64(9):1338-46. doi: 10.1248/cpb.c16-00322.
9
Clinimetric properties and clinical utility in rehabilitation of postsurgical scar rating scales: a systematic review.术后瘢痕评定量表在康复中的测量学特性及临床应用:一项系统评价
Int J Rehabil Res. 2015 Dec;38(4):279-86. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000134.
10
Interpretation of the DermaLab Combo® pigmentation and vascularity measurements in burn scar assessment: an exploratory analysis.DermaLab Combo®色素沉着和血管状况测量在烧伤瘢痕评估中的解读:一项探索性分析。
Burns. 2015 Sep;41(6):1176-85. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2015.01.012. Epub 2015 Feb 19.