Biomedical Engineering Program, Systems Design Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
Bone. 2022 Oct;163:116485. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2022.116485. Epub 2022 Jul 4.
The accumulation of advanced glycation end-products (AGEs) in the organic matrix of bone with aging and chronic disease such as diabetes is thought to increase fracture risk independently of bone mass. However, to date, there has not been a clinical trial to determine whether inhibiting the accumulation of AGEs is effective in preventing low-energy, fragility fractures. Moreover, unlike with cardiovascular or kidney disease, there are also no pre-clinical studies demonstrating that AGE inhibitors or breakers can prevent the age- or diabetes-related decrease in the ability of bone to resist fracture. In this review, we critically examine the case for a long-standing hypothesis that AGE accumulation in bone tissue degrades the toughening mechanisms by which bone resists fracture. Prior research into the role of AGEs in bone has primarily measured pentosidine, an AGE crosslink, or bulk fluorescence of hydrolysates of bone. While significant correlations exist between these measurements and mechanical properties of bone, multiple AGEs are both non-fluorescent and non-crosslinking. Since clinical studies are equivocal on whether circulating pentosidine is an indicator of elevated fracture risk, there needs to be a more complete understanding of the different types of AGEs including non-crosslinking adducts and multiple non-enzymatic crosslinks in bone extracellular matrix and their specific contributions to hindering fracture resistance (biophysical and biological). By doing so, effective strategies to target AGE accumulation in bone with minimal side effects could be investigated in pre-clinical and clinical studies that aim to prevent fragility fractures in conditions that bone mass is not the underlying culprit.
随着年龄的增长和糖尿病等慢性疾病的发生,骨有机基质中晚期糖基化终产物 (AGEs) 的积累被认为会独立于骨量增加骨折风险。然而,迄今为止,还没有临床试验来确定抑制 AGE 积累是否能有效预防低能量、脆弱性骨折。此外,与心血管或肾脏疾病不同,也没有临床前研究表明 AGE 抑制剂或断裂剂可以预防与年龄或糖尿病相关的骨抵抗骨折能力下降。在这篇综述中,我们批判性地审查了一个长期存在的假设,即骨组织中 AGE 的积累会破坏骨抵抗骨折的增韧机制。先前关于 AGE 在骨中的作用的研究主要测量了戊糖素,一种 AGE 交联物,或骨水解物的总荧光。虽然这些测量值与骨的机械性能之间存在显著相关性,但多种 AGE 既非荧光也非交联。由于关于循环戊糖素是否是骨折风险升高的指标的临床研究存在争议,因此需要更全面地了解骨细胞外基质中不同类型的 AGE,包括非交联加合物和多种非酶交联,以及它们对阻碍骨折阻力的具体贡献(生物物理和生物学)。通过这样做,可以在旨在预防骨量不是潜在罪魁祸首的情况下发生脆性骨折的临床前和临床研究中,研究针对骨中 AGE 积累的有效策略,同时尽量减少副作用。