• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种使用集成学习算法快速诊断 COVID-19 的可解释人工智能方法。

An Explainable AI Approach for the Rapid Diagnosis of COVID-19 Using Ensemble Learning Algorithms.

机构信息

Department of Software Engineering, College of Computer Science and Electronic Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha, China.

Academy of Military Sciences, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 21;10:874455. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.874455. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2022.874455
PMID:35801239
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9253566/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Artificial intelligence-based disease prediction models have a greater potential to screen COVID-19 patients than conventional methods. However, their application has been restricted because of their underlying black-box nature.

OBJECTIVE

To addressed this issue, an explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) approach was developed to screen patients for COVID-19.

METHODS

A retrospective study consisting of 1,737 participants (759 COVID-19 patients and 978 controls) admitted to San Raphael Hospital (OSR) from February to May 2020 was used to construct a diagnosis model. Finally, 32 key blood test indices from 1,374 participants were used for screening patients for COVID-19. Four ensemble learning algorithms were used: random forest (RF), adaptive boosting (AdaBoost), gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost). Feature importance from the perspective of the clinical domain and visualized interpretations were illustrated by using local interpretable model-agnostic explanations (LIME) plots.

RESULTS

The GBDT model [area under the curve (AUC): 86.4%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.821-0.907] outperformed the RF model (AUC: 85.7%; 95% CI 0.813-0.902), AdaBoost model (AUC: 85.4%; 95% CI 0.810-0.899), and XGBoost model (AUC: 84.9%; 95% CI 0.803-0.894) in distinguishing patients with COVID-19 from those without. The cumulative feature importance of lactate dehydrogenase, white blood cells, and eosinophil counts was 0.145, 0.130, and 0.128, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Ensemble machining learning (ML) approaches, mainly GBDT and LIME plots, are efficient for screening patients with COVID-19 and might serve as a potential tool in the auxiliary diagnosis of COVID-19. Patients with higher WBC count, higher LDH level, or higher EOT count, were more likely to have COVID-19.

摘要

背景

基于人工智能的疾病预测模型比传统方法更有潜力筛选 COVID-19 患者。然而,由于其潜在的黑盒性质,它们的应用受到了限制。

目的

为了解决这个问题,开发了一种可解释的人工智能(XAI)方法来筛选 COVID-19 患者。

方法

回顾性研究包括 2020 年 2 月至 5 月期间在圣拉斐尔医院(OSR)收治的 1737 名患者(759 名 COVID-19 患者和 978 名对照),用于构建诊断模型。最后,使用 1374 名参与者的 32 个关键血液测试指标来筛选 COVID-19 患者。使用了四种集成学习算法:随机森林(RF)、自适应提升(AdaBoost)、梯度提升决策树(GBDT)和极端梯度提升(XGBoost)。使用局部可解释模型不可知解释(LIME)图从临床角度说明特征重要性和可视化解释。

结果

GBDT 模型(AUC:86.4%;95%置信区间[CI]0.821-0.907)优于 RF 模型(AUC:85.7%;95%CI0.813-0.902)、AdaBoost 模型(AUC:85.4%;95%CI0.810-0.899)和 XGBoost 模型(AUC:84.9%;95%CI0.803-0.894),用于区分 COVID-19 患者和非 COVID-19 患者。乳酸脱氢酶、白细胞和嗜酸性粒细胞计数的累积特征重要性分别为 0.145、0.130 和 0.128。

结论

集成机器学习(ML)方法,主要是 GBDT 和 LIME 图,对于筛选 COVID-19 患者非常有效,可能成为 COVID-19 辅助诊断的潜在工具。白细胞计数、LDH 水平或 EOT 计数较高的患者更有可能患有 COVID-19。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/116b/9253566/03f7d59a7a05/fpubh-10-874455-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/116b/9253566/7a515c8e8ba6/fpubh-10-874455-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/116b/9253566/8bb8d11cfa69/fpubh-10-874455-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/116b/9253566/d180d82cb88c/fpubh-10-874455-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/116b/9253566/45dae3ceefc2/fpubh-10-874455-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/116b/9253566/a4157a932b5a/fpubh-10-874455-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/116b/9253566/03f7d59a7a05/fpubh-10-874455-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/116b/9253566/7a515c8e8ba6/fpubh-10-874455-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/116b/9253566/8bb8d11cfa69/fpubh-10-874455-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/116b/9253566/d180d82cb88c/fpubh-10-874455-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/116b/9253566/45dae3ceefc2/fpubh-10-874455-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/116b/9253566/a4157a932b5a/fpubh-10-874455-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/116b/9253566/03f7d59a7a05/fpubh-10-874455-g0006.jpg

相似文献

1
An Explainable AI Approach for the Rapid Diagnosis of COVID-19 Using Ensemble Learning Algorithms.一种使用集成学习算法快速诊断 COVID-19 的可解释人工智能方法。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 21;10:874455. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.874455. eCollection 2022.
2
Explainable Machine Learning to Predict Successful Weaning Among Patients Requiring Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation: A Retrospective Cohort Study in Central Taiwan.可解释机器学习用于预测需要长期机械通气患者的成功撤机:台湾中部的一项回顾性队列研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Apr 23;8:663739. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.663739. eCollection 2021.
3
Artificial intelligence in clinical care amidst COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review.COVID-19大流行期间临床护理中的人工智能:一项系统综述。
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2021;19:2833-2850. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2021.05.010. Epub 2021 May 7.
4
Explainable artificial intelligence model for identifying COVID-19 gene biomarkers.用于识别 COVID-19 基因生物标志物的可解释人工智能模型。
Comput Biol Med. 2023 Mar;154:106619. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.106619. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
5
Prognostic Assessment of COVID-19 in the Intensive Care Unit by Machine Learning Methods: Model Development and Validation.通过机器学习方法对重症监护病房中新冠肺炎的预后评估:模型开发与验证
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 11;22(11):e23128. doi: 10.2196/23128.
6
Explainable Machine Learning Model to Predict COVID-19 Severity Among Older Adults in the Province of Quebec.用于预测魁北克省老年人中 COVID-19 严重程度的可解释机器学习模型。
Ann Fam Med. 2023 Jan 1;21(21 Suppl 1):3619. doi: 10.1370/afm.21.s1.3619.
7
Model-agnostic explainable artificial intelligence tools for severity prediction and symptom analysis on Indian COVID-19 data.用于印度新冠疫情数据严重程度预测和症状分析的模型无关可解释人工智能工具。
Front Artif Intell. 2023 Dec 4;6:1272506. doi: 10.3389/frai.2023.1272506. eCollection 2023.
8
Beyond black-box models: explainable AI for embryo ploidy prediction and patient-centric consultation.超越黑箱模型:用于胚胎倍性预测和以患者为中心咨询的可解释人工智能
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024 Sep;41(9):2349-2358. doi: 10.1007/s10815-024-03178-7. Epub 2024 Jul 4.
9
An Explainable Artificial Intelligence Framework for the Deterioration Risk Prediction of Hepatitis Patients.用于预测肝炎患者恶化风险的可解释人工智能框架。
J Med Syst. 2021 Apr 13;45(5):61. doi: 10.1007/s10916-021-01736-5.
10
Machine learning-enabled prediction of prolonged length of stay in hospital after surgery for tuberculosis spondylitis patients with unbalanced data: a novel approach using explainable artificial intelligence (XAI).机器学习在数据不平衡的情况下预测脊柱结核手术后住院时间延长的预测:一种使用可解释人工智能 (XAI) 的新方法。
Eur J Med Res. 2024 Jul 25;29(1):383. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-01988-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating Vision and Pathology Foundation Models for Computational Pathology: A Comprehensive Benchmark Study.评估用于计算病理学的视觉与病理学基础模型:一项全面的基准研究
Res Sq. 2025 Jul 4:rs.3.rs-6823810. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6823810/v1.
2
Constructing machine learning-based risk prediction model for osteoarthritis in population aged 45 and above: NHANES 2011-2018.构建基于机器学习的45岁及以上人群骨关节炎风险预测模型:2011 - 2018年美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 24;15(1):14326. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-99411-z.
3
Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Neuroimaging of Alzheimer's Disease.

本文引用的文献

1
RT-qPCR-based tests for SARS-CoV-2 detection in pooled saliva samples for massive population screening to monitor epidemics.基于 RT-qPCR 的 SARS-CoV-2 在混合唾液样本中的检测用于大规模人群筛查以监测疫情。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 16;12(1):8082. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12179-4.
2
COVID-19 and Lessons to Improve Preparedness for the Next Pandemic-Reply.新型冠状病毒肺炎与提升应对下一次大流行准备工作的经验教训——回应
JAMA. 2022 May 10;327(18):1823. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.4169.
3
"H" is not for hydroxychloroquine-"H" is for heparin: lack of efficacy of hydroxychloroquine and the role of heparin in COVID-19-preliminary data of a prospective and interventional study from Brazil.
阿尔茨海默病神经影像学中的可解释人工智能
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Mar 4;15(5):612. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15050612.
4
Adversarial regularized autoencoder graph neural network for microbe-disease associations prediction.对抗正则化自编码器图神经网络在微生物-疾病关联预测中的应用。
Brief Bioinform. 2024 Sep 23;25(6). doi: 10.1093/bib/bbae584.
5
From COVID-19 to monkeypox: a novel predictive model for emerging infectious diseases.从新冠疫情到猴痘:一种针对新发传染病的新型预测模型。
BioData Min. 2024 Oct 22;17(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13040-024-00396-8.
6
Development and application of explainable artificial intelligence using machine learning classification for long-term facial nerve function after vestibular schwannoma surgery.基于机器学习分类的可解释人工智能在前庭神经鞘瘤手术后长期面神经功能中的开发与应用
J Neurooncol. 2025 Jan;171(1):165-177. doi: 10.1007/s11060-024-04844-7. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
7
Predicting dyslipidemia incidence: unleashing machine learning algorithms on Lifestyle Promotion Project data.预测血脂异常发病率:在生活方式促进计划数据上应用机器学习算法。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jul 3;24(1):1777. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19261-8.
8
A tree-based explainable AI model for early detection of Covid-19 using physiological data.基于树的可解释人工智能模型,利用生理数据早期检测新冠病毒。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Jun 24;24(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02576-2.
9
Risk factors and drug discovery for cognitive impairment in type 2 diabetes mellitus using artificial intelligence interpretation and graph neural networks.利用人工智能解释和图神经网络研究 2 型糖尿病认知障碍的风险因素和药物发现。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Aug 25;14:1213711. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1213711. eCollection 2023.
10
Artificial intelligence for diagnosis of mild-moderate COVID-19 using haematological markers.利用血液学标志物进行轻度至中度 COVID-19 诊断的人工智能。
Ann Med. 2023 Dec;55(1):2233541. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2233541.
“H”不是羟氯喹的缩写——“H”代表肝素:羟氯喹无效,肝素在 COVID-19 中的作用——来自巴西的一项前瞻性干预研究的初步数据。
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Feb 4;22(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07110-1.
4
Emergency online teaching during COVID-19: A case study of Australian tertiary students in teacher education and creative arts.新冠疫情期间的应急在线教学:以澳大利亚师范教育和创意艺术专业的大学生为例
Int J Educ Res Open. 2021;2:100057. doi: 10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100057. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
5
Complement Mediated Hemolytic Anemias in the COVID-19 Era: Case Series and Review of the Literature.新型冠状病毒时代的补体介导溶血性贫血:病例系列及文献复习。
Front Immunol. 2021 Nov 25;12:791429. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.791429. eCollection 2021.
6
Basic Predictive Risk Factors for Cytokine Storms in COVID-19 Patients.基本预测 COVID-19 患者细胞因子风暴的风险因素。
Front Immunol. 2021 Nov 10;12:745515. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.745515. eCollection 2021.
7
A randomized controlled trial of a therapeutic relational agent for reducing substance misuse during the COVID-19 pandemic.一项关于治疗性关系代理在 COVID-19 大流行期间减少药物滥用的随机对照试验。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Oct 1;227:108986. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108986. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
8
Covid-19 rapid test by combining a Random Forest-based web system and blood tests.基于随机森林的网络系统与血液检测相结合的新冠病毒快速检测方法。
J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2022;40(22):11948-11967. doi: 10.1080/07391102.2021.1966509. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
9
WHO relaunches global drug trial with three new candidates.世界卫生组织用三种新候选药物重启全球药物试验。
Science. 2021 Aug 6;373(6555):606-607. doi: 10.1126/science.373.6555.606. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
10
Routine Hematological Parameters May Be Predictors of COVID-19 Severity.常规血液学参数可能是 COVID-19 严重程度的预测指标。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Jul 16;8:682843. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.682843. eCollection 2021.