• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参与者在结构化结直肠癌筛查计划中管理屏幕检测到的复杂息肉的体验。

Participants' experiences of the management of screen-detected complex polyps within a structured bowel cancer screening programme.

机构信息

Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.

Public Health Wales, Wales, UK.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2022 Oct;25(5):2355-2364. doi: 10.1111/hex.13525. Epub 2022 Jul 7.

DOI:10.1111/hex.13525
PMID:35801273
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9615050/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Bowel Screening Wales complex polyp removal service was introduced to address variations in surgery rates for screen-detected complex benign colorectal polyps, to improve the quality of the screening service and to make management of these polyps more equitable across Wales. Little is known about patient experiences and the potential impact on quality of life when undergoing complex polyp removal. This study is part of a wider research programme evaluating the decision-making, pathways and outcomes from complex polyp removal.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to understand experiences of having a complex polyp removed and how this may influence quality of life.

DESIGN

Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted, and a thematic approach was used for data analysis.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

All participants had a complex polyp removed after a positive stool test and review by Bowel Screening Wales' Network Multi-Disciplinary Team.

RESULTS

Twenty-one participants were interviewed. Most participants had their complex polyps removed endoscopically and reported no or minor problems or negative outcomes following their procedure. For a small minority, worse problems (e.g., pain, bowel dysfunction) and negative outcomes (e.g., cancer) followed their procedures. Most participants felt supported and reassured throughout their procedures. Any physical and emotional changes to quality of life were mainly linked to procedure outcomes.

DISCUSSION

Experiences of complex polyp removal were generally positive, with minimal changes in quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

While most people had a positive experience of having a complex polyp removed, support initiatives, such as counselling or signposting to coping strategies, may be helpful to reduce any potential negative effects of procedures on quality of life.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Four patient and public involvement partners provided feedback on participant materials.

摘要

背景

威尔士结直肠筛查复杂息肉切除术服务的推出是为了解决因筛查发现的复杂良性结直肠息肉而导致的手术率差异,提高筛查服务质量,并使威尔士各地对这些息肉的管理更加公平。对于接受复杂息肉切除术的患者体验及其对生活质量的潜在影响,人们知之甚少。本研究是评估复杂息肉切除术的决策、途径和结果的更广泛研究计划的一部分。

目的

本研究旨在了解接受复杂息肉切除术的体验,以及这如何影响生活质量。

设计

进行了半结构式电话访谈,并采用主题方法进行数据分析。

地点和参与者

所有参与者均因粪便检测阳性并经威尔士结直肠筛查网络多学科团队审查后接受复杂息肉切除术。

结果

共对 21 名参与者进行了访谈。大多数参与者通过内镜切除了他们的复杂息肉,且在手术后没有或仅有轻微的问题或负面结果。对于少数人来说,手术过程中出现了更严重的问题(如疼痛、肠道功能障碍)和负面结果(如癌症)。大多数参与者在整个手术过程中都感到支持和安心。生活质量的任何身体和情绪变化主要与手术结果有关。

讨论

复杂息肉切除术的体验总体上是积极的,生活质量的变化很小。

结论

虽然大多数人对接受复杂息肉切除术的体验是积极的,但支持性举措,如咨询或提供应对策略的指导,可能有助于减轻手术对生活质量的任何潜在负面影响。

患者或公众参与

四名患者和公众参与伙伴对参与者材料提供了反馈。

相似文献

1
Participants' experiences of the management of screen-detected complex polyps within a structured bowel cancer screening programme.参与者在结构化结直肠癌筛查计划中管理屏幕检测到的复杂息肉的体验。
Health Expect. 2022 Oct;25(5):2355-2364. doi: 10.1111/hex.13525. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
2
Planning management for complex colorectal polyps: a qualitative assessment of factors influencing decision-making among colonoscopists.复杂结直肠息肉的规划管理:影响结肠镜医师决策的因素定性评估。
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2023 May;10(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2022-001097.
3
Variations in the management of significant polyps and early colorectal cancer: results from a multicentre observational study of 383 patients.显著息肉和早期结直肠癌的处理方法存在差异:一项对 383 例患者进行的多中心观察性研究结果。
Colorectal Dis. 2018 Dec;20(12):1088-1096. doi: 10.1111/codi.14342. Epub 2018 Aug 6.
4
High resolution colonoscopy in a bowel cancer screening program improves polyp detection.在结直肠癌筛查项目中进行高分辨率结肠镜检查可提高息肉检出率。
World J Gastroenterol. 2011 Oct 14;17(38):4308-13. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i38.4308.
5
Factors associated with failed polyp retrieval at screening colonoscopy.与筛查结肠镜检查中息肉无法取出相关的因素。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Mar;77(3):395-400. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.10.007. Epub 2012 Dec 1.
6
Virtual chromoendoscopy for the real-time assessment of colorectal polyps in vivo: a systematic review and economic evaluation.虚拟染色内镜实时评估活体结直肠息肉:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2017 Dec;21(79):1-308. doi: 10.3310/hta21790.
7
Referrals for surgical removal of polyps since the introduction of a colorectal cancer screening programme.自结直肠癌筛查计划实施以来,因息肉切除而转诊的情况。
Colorectal Dis. 2021 Mar;23(3):672-679. doi: 10.1111/codi.15413. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
8
Morbidity and mortality after major large bowel resection of non-malignant polyp among participants in a population-based screening program.人群筛查项目中,非恶性息肉患者接受大肠切除术的发病率和死亡率。
J Med Screen. 2021 Sep;28(3):261-267. doi: 10.1177/0969141320967960. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
9
Role of colonoscopy and polyp characteristics in colorectal cancer after colonoscopic polyp detection: a population-based case-control study.结肠镜检查和息肉特征在结肠镜检查发现息肉后的结直肠癌中的作用:基于人群的病例对照研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Aug 21;157(4):225-32. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-4-201208210-00002.
10
Management of complex colonic polyps in the English Bowel Cancer Screening Programme.英国肠癌筛查计划中复杂结肠息肉的处理。
Br J Surg. 2013 Nov;100(12):1633-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9282.

引用本文的文献

1
Planning management for complex colorectal polyps: a qualitative assessment of factors influencing decision-making among colonoscopists.复杂结直肠息肉的规划管理:影响结肠镜医师决策的因素定性评估。
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2023 May;10(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2022-001097.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient Experiences with Colonoscopy: A Qualitative Study.结肠镜检查患者的经历:一项定性研究。
J Can Assoc Gastroenterol. 2019 Jun 17;3(6):249-256. doi: 10.1093/jcag/gwz016. eCollection 2020 Dec.
2
Is my life going to change?-a review of quality of life after rectal resection.我的生活会改变吗?——直肠切除术后生活质量综述
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2020 Feb;11(1):91-101. doi: 10.21037/jgo.2019.10.03.
3
Significant polyp and early colorectal cancer - decision-making and treatment planning in regional networks and multidisciplinary teams.重大息肉与早期结直肠癌——区域网络和多学科团队中的决策与治疗规划
Colorectal Dis. 2019 Mar;21 Suppl 1:16-18. doi: 10.1111/codi.14492.
4
SPECC: concept, clinical relevance and application.SPECC:概念、临床相关性及应用
Colorectal Dis. 2019 Mar;21 Suppl 1:6-7. doi: 10.1111/codi.14488.
5
The "Difficult" Colorectal Polyps and Adenomas: Practical Aspects.“困难型” 大肠息肉和腺瘤:实际情况
Dig Dis. 2019;37(5):394-399. doi: 10.1159/000495694. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
6
Bowel dysfunction after sigmoid resection for cancer and its impact on quality of life.乙状结肠切除术后的肠道功能障碍及其对生活质量的影响。
Br J Surg. 2019 Jan;106(1):142-151. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10979. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
7
Management of complex polyps of the colon and rectum.结肠和直肠复杂息肉的管理
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Feb;33(2):115-129. doi: 10.1007/s00384-017-2950-1. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
8
Quality Matters: Improving the Quality of Care for Patients With Complex Colorectal Polyps.质量至关重要:提高复杂结直肠息肉患者的护理质量。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2018 Mar;113(3):317-321. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2017.409. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
9
A novel method for determining the difficulty of colonoscopic polypectomy.一种确定结肠镜息肉切除术难度的新方法。
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2013 Oct;4(4):244-248. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2013-100331. Epub 2013 Jun 1.
10
Endoscopic resection is cost-effective compared with laparoscopic resection in the management of complex colon polyps: an economic analysis.在复杂结肠息肉的治疗中,与腹腔镜切除术相比,内镜切除术具有成本效益:一项经济学分析。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Jun;83(6):1248-57. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.11.014. Epub 2015 Dec 1.