Semagn Kassa, Iqbal Muhammad, Jarquin Diego, Randhawa Harpinder, Aboukhaddour Reem, Howard Reka, Ciechanowska Izabela, Farzand Momna, Dhariwal Raman, Hiebert Colin W, N'Diaye Amidou, Pozniak Curtis, Spaner Dean
Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, 4-10 Agriculture-Forestry Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2P5, Canada.
Agronomy Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Plants (Basel). 2022 Jun 30;11(13):1736. doi: 10.3390/plants11131736.
Some previous studies have assessed the predictive ability of genome-wide selection on stripe (yellow) rust resistance in wheat, but the effect of genotype by environment interaction (GEI) in prediction accuracies has not been well studied in diverse genetic backgrounds. Here, we compared the predictive ability of a model based on phenotypic data only (M1), the main effect of phenotype and molecular markers (M2), and a model that incorporated GEI (M3) using three cross-validations (CV1, CV2, and CV0) scenarios of interest to breeders in six spring wheat populations. Each population was evaluated at three to eight field nurseries and genotyped with either the DArTseq technology or the wheat 90K single nucleotide polymorphism arrays, of which a subset of 1,058- 23,795 polymorphic markers were used for the analyses. In the CV1 scenario, the mean prediction accuracies of the M1, M2, and M3 models across the six populations varied from -0.11 to -0.07, from 0.22 to 0.49, and from 0.19 to 0.48, respectively. Mean accuracies obtained using the M3 model in the CV1 scenario were significantly greater than the M2 model in two populations, the same in three populations, and smaller in one population. In both the CV2 and CV0 scenarios, the mean prediction accuracies of the three models varied from 0.53 to 0.84 and were not significantly different in all populations, except the Attila/CDC Go in the CV2, where the M3 model gave greater accuracy than both the M1 and M2 models. Overall, the M3 model increased prediction accuracies in some populations by up to 12.4% and decreased accuracy in others by up to 17.4%, demonstrating inconsistent results among genetic backgrounds that require considering each population separately. This is the first comprehensive genome-wide prediction study that investigated details of the effect of GEI on stripe rust resistance across diverse spring wheat populations.
此前一些研究评估了全基因组选择对小麦条锈病抗性的预测能力,但在不同遗传背景下,基因型与环境互作(GEI)对预测准确性的影响尚未得到充分研究。在此,我们在六个春小麦群体中,使用育种者感兴趣的三种交叉验证(CV1、CV2和CV0)方案,比较了仅基于表型数据的模型(M1)、表型和分子标记的主效应模型(M2)以及纳入GEI的模型(M3)的预测能力。每个群体在三到八个田间苗圃进行评估,并使用DArTseq技术或小麦90K单核苷酸多态性阵列进行基因分型,其中1,058 - 23,795个多态性标记子集用于分析。在CV1方案中,六个群体中M1、M2和M3模型的平均预测准确性分别在-0.11至-0.07、0.22至0.49和0.19至0.48之间变化。在CV1方案中,使用M3模型获得的平均准确性在两个群体中显著高于M2模型,在三个群体中相同,在一个群体中较低。在CV2和CV0方案中,三个模型的平均预测准确性在0.53至0.84之间变化,除了CV2中的Attila/CDC Go群体外,在所有群体中均无显著差异,在该群体中M3模型的准确性高于M1和M2模型。总体而言,M3模型在一些群体中使预测准确性提高了高达12.4%,而在其他群体中使准确性降低了高达17.4%,表明不同遗传背景之间结果不一致,需要分别考虑每个群体。这是第一项全面的全基因组预测研究,调查了GEI对不同春小麦群体条锈病抗性影响的详细情况。