Suppr超能文献

一过性全面性遗忘症患者边缘协变网络的改变。

Limbic covariance network alterations in patients with transient global amnesia.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Haeundae-ro 875, Haeundae-gu, Busan, 48108, Republic of Korea.

Department of Radiology, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Neurol. 2022 Nov;269(11):5954-5962. doi: 10.1007/s00415-022-11263-z. Epub 2022 Jul 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We compared limbic structure volumes and graph theory parameters of the limbic covariance network between patients with transient global amnesia (TGA) and healthy controls, and between patients with single and recurrent TGA events.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 122 patients with TGA (single event, n = 107; recurrent events, n = 15) and 50 healthy controls who underwent three-dimensional T1-weighted MRI imaging of the brain. Volumetric analysis of the subcortical limbic structures, including the hippocampus, amygdala, thalamus, mammillary body, hypothalamus, basal forebrain, septal nuclei, fornix, and nucleus accumbens, was performed. We examined the limbic covariance network using a graph theory.

RESULTS

Limbic structure volumes did not differ between patients with TGA and healthy controls, and between patients with a single event and those with recurrent events. However, the radius of the limbic covariance network was significantly greater in patients with TGA than in healthy controls (6.595 vs. 4.564, p = 0.040). Furthermore, the radius, diameter, eccentricity, and characteristics path length were greater (4.066 vs. 2.000, p = 0.009; 7.062 vs. 3.645, p = 0.029; 5.633 vs. 2.774, p = 0.013; 3.373 vs. 1.688, p = 0.004; respectively), whereas the average strength, global efficiency, local efficiency, mean clustering coefficient, transitivity, and small-worldness index were lower (5.595 vs. 10.831, p = 0.004; 0.350 vs. 0.642, p = 0.002; 0.531 vs. 1.724, p = 0.004; 0.304 vs. 0.624, p = 0.006; 0.456 vs. 0.935, p = 0.003; 0.913 vs. 0.993, p = 0.017; respectively), in patients with recurrent events than in those with a single event.

CONCLUSION

The limbic covariance network shows significant alterations in patients with TGA, as well as differences between patients with recurrent events and those with a single event. These findings suggest that changes in the limbic covariance network could be related to the pathogenesis of TGA.

摘要

背景

我们比较了短暂性全面遗忘症(TGA)患者与健康对照者之间、单次发作 TGA 患者与复发性 TGA 患者之间的边缘结构体积和边缘协变网络的图论参数。

方法

我们回顾性纳入了 122 例 TGA 患者(单次发作,n=107;复发性发作,n=15)和 50 名健康对照者,所有患者均接受了三维 T1 加权脑 MRI 成像。我们对包括海马体、杏仁核、丘脑、乳头体、下丘脑、基底前脑、隔核、穹窿和伏隔核在内的皮质下边缘结构进行了容积分析。我们使用图论来检查边缘协变网络。

结果

TGA 患者与健康对照者之间、单次发作 TGA 患者与复发性发作 TGA 患者之间的边缘结构体积无差异。然而,TGA 患者的边缘协变网络半径显著大于健康对照者(6.595 比 4.564,p=0.040)。此外,TGA 患者的网络半径、直径、偏心率和特征路径长度更大(4.066 比 2.000,p=0.009;7.062 比 3.645,p=0.029;5.633 比 2.774,p=0.013;3.373 比 1.688,p=0.004),而平均强度、全局效率、局部效率、平均聚类系数、传递性和小世界指数更低(5.595 比 10.831,p=0.004;0.350 比 0.642,p=0.002;0.531 比 1.724,p=0.004;0.304 比 0.624,p=0.006;0.456 比 0.935,p=0.003;0.913 比 0.993,p=0.017),而复发性发作 TGA 患者的上述参数均小于单次发作 TGA 患者。

结论

TGA 患者的边缘协变网络存在显著改变,而复发性发作 TGA 患者与单次发作 TGA 患者之间存在差异。这些发现提示边缘协变网络的改变可能与 TGA 的发病机制有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验