Guthauser U, Flammer J, Niesel P
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1987;225(2):129-32. doi: 10.1007/BF02160344.
In a retrospective study of 50 eyes with chronic open-angle glaucoma we compared the findings obtained using stereochronoscopy (Sc), papillometry (Pm) and visual-field measurements. We found relationship between the neuroretinal-rim area and the visual-field findings measured using the Octopus glaucoma program, G1. There was only a weak relationship between the Sc findings and the visual-field measurements. This suggests that Sc detects a type of damage that is not detectable either using Pm or by visual-field examinations. Our results also suggest that quantitative perimetry detects the same kind of damage as that revealed by Pm. The neuroretinal-rim area was best correlated with short-term fluctuation, but was also very significantly correlated with mean damage and corrected loss variance.
在一项对50只慢性开角型青光眼眼睛的回顾性研究中，我们比较了使用立体视镜检查（Sc）、视乳头测量法（Pm）和视野测量所获得的结果。我们发现神经视网膜边缘区域与使用Octopus青光眼程序G1测量的视野结果之间存在关联。Sc检查结果与视野测量之间仅存在微弱的关联。这表明Sc检测到一种使用Pm或视野检查无法检测到的损伤类型。我们的结果还表明，定量视野检查检测到的损伤类型与Pm所显示的相同。神经视网膜边缘区域与短期波动的相关性最佳，但与平均损伤和校正损失方差也非常显著相关。
