• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用文献计量学评估转化生物医学研究中心的成果与影响力。

Using bibliometrics to evaluate outcomes and influence of translational biomedical research centers.

作者信息

Bragg Kristine M, Marchand Gwen C, Hilpert Jonathan C, Cummings Jeffrey L

机构信息

Department of Educational Psychology and Higher Education, College of Education, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, USA.

Chambers-Grundy Center for Transformative Neuroscience, Department of Brain Health, School of Integrated Health Sciences, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Oct 7;6(1):e72. doi: 10.1017/cts.2021.863. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1017/cts.2021.863
PMID:35836786
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9257775/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Federal grant funding to support infrastructure development of translational biomedical research centers is a form of public health intervention. Establishing rigorous methods for measuring center success and outcomes is essential to justify continued funding.

METHODS

Bibliometric data compiled from a 5-year funding cycle of neurodegeneration and translational neuroscience research center were analyzed using the package bibliometrix for open-source software R and the NIH-developed research tool iCite.

RESULTS

The research team and their collaborators (n = 485) produced 157 grant-citing publications from 2015-2020. The science was produced by small research teams clustered around three main communities of topics: Alzheimer's Disease, brain imaging, and neuropsychological testing in the elderly. Using the relative citation ratio, the publications produced by the research team were found to be influential when compared to other R01-funded publications.

CONCLUSION

Recent developments in bibliometric analysis expand beyond traditional measurement capabilities to better understand the characteristics, outcomes, and influences of research teams. These findings can be used to inform researchers and institutions about research team composition, productivity, and success. Measures of research influence may be used to justify return on investment to funders.

摘要

引言

联邦拨款资助转化性生物医学研究中心的基础设施建设是一种公共卫生干预形式。建立严格的方法来衡量中心的成功与成果对于证明持续拨款的合理性至关重要。

方法

使用适用于开源软件R的bibliometrix软件包和美国国立卫生研究院开发的研究工具iCite,对从神经退行性疾病和转化神经科学研究中心5年资助周期中汇编的文献计量数据进行分析。

结果

研究团队及其合作者(共485人)在2015年至2020年期间发表了157篇被资助项目引用的论文。这些研究成果由围绕三个主要主题领域聚集的小型研究团队产出:阿尔茨海默病、脑成像以及老年人的神经心理测试。通过相对引用率发现,与其他由R01资助的出版物相比,该研究团队发表的论文具有影响力。

结论

文献计量分析的最新进展超越了传统的测量能力,能够更好地理解研究团队的特征、成果和影响力。这些发现可用于向研究人员和机构提供有关研究团队组成、生产力和成功情况的信息。研究影响力的衡量标准可用于向资助者证明投资回报的合理性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d437/9257775/45e6eb85eae3/S2059866121008633_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d437/9257775/c746e685babd/S2059866121008633_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d437/9257775/b12707382b34/S2059866121008633_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d437/9257775/45e6eb85eae3/S2059866121008633_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d437/9257775/c746e685babd/S2059866121008633_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d437/9257775/b12707382b34/S2059866121008633_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d437/9257775/45e6eb85eae3/S2059866121008633_fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Using bibliometrics to evaluate outcomes and influence of translational biomedical research centers.利用文献计量学评估转化生物医学研究中心的成果与影响力。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Oct 7;6(1):e72. doi: 10.1017/cts.2021.863. eCollection 2022.
2
Scholarly Productivity Evaluation of KL2 Scholars Using Bibliometrics and Federal Follow-on Funding: Cross-Institution Study.使用文献计量学和联邦后续资助评估 KL2 学者的学术产出:跨机构研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Sep 29;23(9):e29239. doi: 10.2196/29239.
3
Impact of National Institutes of Health and Food and Drug Administration Tobacco Research Funding: A Bibliometrics Analyses.美国国立卫生研究院和美国食品和药物管理局烟草研究经费的影响:文献计量学分析。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2023 May 22;25(6):1082-1089. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntad024.
4
Charting the Publication and Citation Impact of the NIH Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) Program From 2006 Through 2016.绘制 NIH 临床与转化科学奖(CTSA)计划 2006 年至 2016 年的发表和引文影响图。
Acad Med. 2018 Aug;93(8):1162-1170. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002119.
5
Conversational Interfaces for Health: Bibliometric Analysis of Grants, Publications, and Patents.健康领域的对话界面:资助、出版物及专利的文献计量分析
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Nov 18;21(11):e14672. doi: 10.2196/14672.
6
A large National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre facilitates impactful cross-disciplinary and collaborative translational research publications and research collaboration networks: a bibliometric evaluation study.一个大型的英国国家健康研究所(NIHR)生物医学研究中心促进了有影响力的跨学科和协作转化研究出版物和研究合作网络:一项文献计量评估研究。
J Transl Med. 2021 Nov 27;19(1):483. doi: 10.1186/s12967-021-03149-x.
7
The publication impact of the first 100 THOR Network publications by bibliometric and social network analyses.通过文献计量学和社会网络分析,评估前 100 篇 THOR 网络出版物的发表影响力。
Transfusion. 2022 Aug;62 Suppl 1:S1-S11. doi: 10.1111/trf.16956. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
8
Network-based assessment of collaborative research in neuroscience.基于网络的神经科学合作研究评估
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2018 Sep 6;4:433-443. doi: 10.1016/j.trci.2018.08.006. eCollection 2018.
9
Efficacy of Centers of Biomedical Research Excellence (CoBRE) Grants to Build Research Capacity in Underrepresented States.卓越生物医学研究中心(CoBRE)资助项目在提升代表性不足州研究能力方面的成效。
bioRxiv. 2024 Jan 9:2023.08.02.551624. doi: 10.1101/2023.08.02.551624.
10
Using bibliometrics to evaluate translational science training: evidence for early career success of KL2 scholars.利用文献计量学评估转化科学培训:KL2学者早期职业成功的证据。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Jul 24;5(1):e24. doi: 10.1017/cts.2020.516.

引用本文的文献

1
Building a Collaborative Translational Research Platform: Identifying Barriers and Enablers From Basic Research to Primary Healthcare.构建协作性转化研究平台:识别从基础研究到初级医疗保健的障碍与促进因素。
Cureus. 2025 Feb 7;17(2):e78699. doi: 10.7759/cureus.78699. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Bibliometric and social network analysis of a Clinical and Translational Resource awardee: An Oklahoma experience 2014-2021.临床与转化资源获奖者的文献计量学与社会网络分析:俄克拉荷马州2014 - 2021年的经验
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Dec 7;8(1):e10. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.690. eCollection 2024.
3
The Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network: a model for clinical trial readiness.

本文引用的文献

1
Fundamental challenges in assessing the impact of research infrastructure.评估研究基础设施影响的基本挑战。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Aug 18;19(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00769-z.
2
Great minds think alike, or do they often differ? Research topic overlap and the formation of scientific teams.英雄所见略同,还是常存分歧?研究主题重叠与科研团队的形成。
J Informetr. 2021 Feb;15(1). doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2020.101104. Epub 2020 Dec 5.
3
Bibliometrics approach to evaluating the research impact of CTSAs: A pilot study.用于评估临床与转化科学奖(CTSAs)研究影响力的文献计量学方法:一项试点研究。
罕见病临床研究网络:临床试验准备就绪的典范。
Ther Adv Rare Dis. 2023 Dec 26;4:26330040231219272. doi: 10.1177/26330040231219272. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
4
Smartphones and Learning: Evaluating the Focus of Recent Research.智能手机与学习:评估近期研究重点
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2023 Apr 6;13(4):748-758. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe13040056.
5
Characteristics and hotspots of the 50 most cited articles in the field of pre-psoas oblique lumbar interbody fusion.腰大肌前斜行腰椎椎间融合领域50篇被引频次最高文章的特征与热点
Front Surg. 2022 Oct 12;9:1004839. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1004839. eCollection 2022.
6
Structure, function, and productivity from the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.来自国家基于牙科实践的研究网络的结构、功能与生产力
J Clin Transl Sci. 2022 Jun 22;6(1):e87. doi: 10.1017/cts.2022.421. eCollection 2022.
J Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Apr 2;4(4):336-344. doi: 10.1017/cts.2020.29.
4
Trends and predictors of biomedical research quality, 1990-2015: a meta-research study.1990-2015 年生物医学研究质量的趋势和预测因素:一项元研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 3;9(9):e030342. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030342.
5
Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology.大团队推动科学技术发展,小团队则颠覆之。
Nature. 2019 Feb;566(7744):378-382. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-0941-9. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
6
Network-based assessment of collaborative research in neuroscience.基于网络的神经科学合作研究评估
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2018 Sep 6;4:433-443. doi: 10.1016/j.trci.2018.08.006. eCollection 2018.
7
The Impact Factor Fallacy.影响因子谬误
Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 20;9:1487. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01487. eCollection 2018.
8
Charting the Publication and Citation Impact of the NIH Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) Program From 2006 Through 2016.绘制 NIH 临床与转化科学奖(CTSA)计划 2006 年至 2016 年的发表和引文影响图。
Acad Med. 2018 Aug;93(8):1162-1170. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002119.
9
Detecting and analyzing research communities in longitudinal scientific networks.在纵向科学网络中检测和分析研究社群
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 10;12(8):e0182516. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182516. eCollection 2017.
10
Feasibility of common bibliometrics in evaluating translational science.常用文献计量学在评估转化医学科研中的可行性
J Clin Transl Sci. 2017 Feb;1(1):45-52. doi: 10.1017/cts.2016.8. Epub 2017 Jan 31.