Martínez-Cartagena Manuel Eduardo, Bernal-Martínez Juan, Banda-Villanueva Arnulfo, Magaña Ilse, Córdova Teresa, Ledezma-Pérez Antonio, Fernández-Tavizón Salvador, Díaz de León Ramón
Advanced Materials Department, Research Center in Applied Chemistry (CIQA), Saltillo, México.
Laboratory in Biomedicine and Nanotechnology, Aguascalientes, México.
Front Chem. 2022 Jun 29;10:915264. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2022.915264. eCollection 2022.
It has been two decades since biomimetic synthesis of conducting polymers were first reported, however, the systematic investigation of how catalysts influence the properties of the conducting polymers has not been reported yet. In this paper, we report a comparative study between peroxidase-like catalyst, dopants, and their effect on the properties of poly (3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT), polypyrrole (PPY), and polyaniline (PANI). We also investigate the EDOT-Pyrrole and EDOT-Aniline copolymerization by enzymomimetic synthesis using two catalysts (Ferrocene and Hematin). It was found that, chemically, there are no detectable effects, only having small contributions in molar ratios greater than 0.7-0.3. Spectroscopic data provide solid evidence concerning the effect in the variation of the molar fractions, finding that, as the molar fraction of EDOT decreases, changes associated with loss of the conjugation of the structure and the oxidation state of the chains were observed. The electrical conductivity was considerably modified depending on the type of catalyst. Hematin produces conductive homopolymers and copolymers when doped with -toluene sulfonic acid (TSA), while ferrocene produces low conductive copolymers under the same conditions. The mole fraction affects conductivity significantly, showing that as the EDOT fraction decreases, the conductivity drops drastically for both EDOT-PY and EDOT-ANI copolymers. The type of dopant also notably affects conductivity; the best values were obtained by doping with TSA, while the lowest were obtained when doping with polystyrene sulfonate (PSS). We also draw a biomimetic route to tailor the fundamental properties of conducting homopolymers and copolymers for their design and scaled-up production, as they have recently been found to have use in a broad range of applications.
自首次报道导电聚合物的仿生合成以来已有二十年,但尚未有关于催化剂如何影响导电聚合物性能的系统研究报道。在本文中,我们报告了过氧化物酶样催化剂、掺杂剂及其对聚(3,4-乙撑二氧噻吩)(PEDOT)、聚吡咯(PPY)和聚苯胺(PANI)性能影响的比较研究。我们还研究了使用两种催化剂(二茂铁和血红素)通过酶模拟合成进行的3,4-乙撑二氧噻吩-吡咯和3,4-乙撑二氧噻吩-苯胺共聚反应。结果发现,从化学角度来看,没有可检测到的影响,仅在摩尔比大于0.7-0.3时有微小贡献。光谱数据为摩尔分数变化的影响提供了确凿证据,发现随着3,4-乙撑二氧噻吩摩尔分数的降低,观察到与结构共轭丧失和链氧化态相关的变化。电导率根据催化剂类型有显著改变。血红素在掺杂对甲苯磺酸(TSA)时产生导电均聚物和共聚物,而二茂铁在相同条件下产生低导电共聚物。摩尔分数对电导率有显著影响,表明随着3,4-乙撑二氧噻吩分数降低,3,4-乙撑二氧噻吩-吡咯和3,4-乙撑二氧噻吩-苯胺共聚物的电导率均急剧下降。掺杂剂类型也显著影响电导率;用TSA掺杂时获得最佳值,而用聚苯乙烯磺酸盐(PSS)掺杂时获得最低值。我们还绘制了一条仿生路线,以定制导电均聚物和共聚物的基本性能用于其设计和放大生产,因为最近发现它们在广泛的应用中有用途。