Wang Quan, Wei Xiaojie, Dang Ruochen, Zhu Feiyu, Yin Shaokang, Hu Bingliang
Key Laboratory of Spectral Imaging Technology, Xi'an Institute of Optics and Precision Mechanics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi'an, China.
Key Laboratory of Biomedical Spectroscopy of Xi'an, Xi'an Institute of Optics and Precision Mechanics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi'an, China.
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jun 30;13:933793. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.933793. eCollection 2022.
Psychological issues are common among adolescents, which have a significant impact on their growth and development. However, the underlying neural mechanisms of viewing visual stimuli in adolescents are poorly understood.
This study applied the Chinese version of the DSM-V self-assessment scales to evaluate 73 adolescents' psychological characteristics for depressive and manic emotional issues. Combined with eye-tracking and event-related potential (ERP), we explored the characteristics of their visual attention and neural processing mechanisms while freely viewing positive, dysphoric, threatening and neutral visual stimuli.
Compared to controls, adolescents with depressive emotional tendencies showed more concentrated looking behavior with fixation distribution index than the controls, while adolescents with manic emotional tendencies showed no such trait. ERP data revealed individuals with depressive tendencies showed lower arousal levels toward emotional stimuli in the early stage of cognitive processing (N1 amplitude decreased) and with prolonged reaction time (N1 latency increased) than the control group. We found no significant difference between the manic group and the control group. Furthermore, the depression severity scores of the individuals with depressive tendencies were negatively correlated with the total fixation time toward positive stimuli, were negatively correlated with the fixation distribution index toward threatening stimuli, and were positively correlated with the mean N1 amplitudes while viewing dysphoric stimuli. Also, for the individuals with depressive tendencies, there was a positive correlation between the mean N1 amplitudes and the fixation time on the area of interest (AOI) while viewing dysphoric stimuli. For the individuals with manic tendencies, the manic severity scores of the individuals with manic tendencies were positively correlated with the total fixation time toward the positive stimuli. However, no significant correlations were found between the manic severity scores and N1 amplitudes, and between N1 amplitudes and eye-tracking output variables.
This study proposes the application of eye-tracking and ERP to provide better biological evidence to alter the neural processing of emotional stimuli for adolescents with emotional issues.
心理问题在青少年中很常见,对他们的成长和发展有重大影响。然而,青少年观看视觉刺激的潜在神经机制尚不清楚。
本研究应用中文版DSM-V自评量表评估73名青少年抑郁和躁狂情绪问题的心理特征。结合眼动追踪和事件相关电位(ERP),我们在自由观看积极、烦躁、威胁和中性视觉刺激时,探索了他们的视觉注意力特征和神经加工机制。
与对照组相比,有抑郁情绪倾向的青少年在注视分布指数上表现出比对照组更集中的注视行为,而有躁狂情绪倾向的青少年则没有这种特征。ERP数据显示,有抑郁倾向的个体在认知加工早期对情绪刺激的唤醒水平较低(N1波幅降低),且反应时间延长(N1潜伏期增加)。我们发现躁狂组和对照组之间没有显著差异。此外,有抑郁倾向的个体的抑郁严重程度评分与对积极刺激的总注视时间呈负相关,与对威胁刺激的注视分布指数呈负相关,与观看烦躁刺激时的平均N1波幅呈正相关。而且,对于有抑郁倾向的个体,观看烦躁刺激时平均N1波幅与感兴趣区域(AOI)的注视时间呈正相关。对于有躁狂倾向的个体,有躁狂倾向的个体的躁狂严重程度评分与对积极刺激的总注视时间呈正相关。然而,在躁狂严重程度评分与N1波幅之间以及N1波幅与眼动追踪输出变量之间未发现显著相关性。
本研究提出应用眼动追踪和ERP为有情绪问题的青少年改变情绪刺激的神经加工提供更好的生物学证据。