• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Targeted maximum likelihood estimation of causal effects with interference: A simulation study.具有干扰的因果效应的有针对性极大似然估计:一项模拟研究。
Stat Med. 2022 Oct 15;41(23):4554-4577. doi: 10.1002/sim.9525. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
2
Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Causal Inference in Observational Studies.观察性研究中因果推断的靶向最大似然估计
Am J Epidemiol. 2017 Jan 1;185(1):65-73. doi: 10.1093/aje/kww165. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
3
Effect Estimation in Point-Exposure Studies with Binary Outcomes and High-Dimensional Covariate Data - A Comparison of Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting.二元结局和高维协变量数据的点暴露研究中的效应估计——靶向最大似然估计与治疗权重逆概率的比较
Int J Biostat. 2016 Nov 1;12(2). doi: 10.1515/ijb-2015-0034.
4
Collaborative double robust targeted maximum likelihood estimation.协作双稳健靶向最大似然估计
Int J Biostat. 2010 May 17;6(1):Article 17. doi: 10.2202/1557-4679.1181.
5
Handling missing data when estimating causal effects with targeted maximum likelihood estimation. 采用有向极大似然估计法估计因果效应时处理缺失数据。
Am J Epidemiol. 2024 Jul 8;193(7):1019-1030. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwae012.
6
A new approach to hierarchical data analysis: Targeted maximum likelihood estimation for the causal effect of a cluster-level exposure.一种新的层次数据分析方法:针对簇级暴露的因果效应的有针对性的极大似然估计。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 Jun;28(6):1761-1780. doi: 10.1177/0962280218774936. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
7
Targeted maximum likelihood estimation for causal inference in survival and competing risks analysis.生存和竞争风险分析中因果推断的靶向极大似然估计。
Lifetime Data Anal. 2024 Jan;30(1):4-33. doi: 10.1007/s10985-022-09576-2. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
8
Semi-Parametric Estimation and Inference for the Mean Outcome of the Single Time-Point Intervention in a Causally Connected Population.因果关联总体中单一时间点干预平均结果的半参数估计与推断
J Causal Inference. 2017 Mar;5(1). doi: 10.1515/jci-2016-0003. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
9
A targeted maximum likelihood estimator of a causal effect on a bounded continuous outcome.对有界连续结果的因果效应的靶向最大似然估计量。
Int J Biostat. 2010;6(1):Article 26. doi: 10.2202/1557-4679.1260. Epub 2010 Aug 1.
10
Targeted minimum loss based estimation of causal effects of multiple time point interventions.基于目标最小损失的多个时间点干预因果效应估计
Int J Biostat. 2012;8(1). doi: 10.1515/1557-4679.1370.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a Risk-Scoring System for Prediction of Blood Transfusion During Hospitalization for Delivery.用于预测分娩住院期间输血的风险评分系统的开发。
O G Open. 2025 Apr;2(2). doi: 10.1097/og9.0000000000000078. Epub 2025 Apr 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Causal Inference for Social Network Data.社交网络数据的因果推断
J Am Stat Assoc. 2024;119(545):597-611. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2022.2131557. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
2
Effectiveness of Localized Lockdowns in the COVID-19 Pandemic.局部封锁在 COVID-19 大流行中的效果。
Am J Epidemiol. 2022 Mar 24;191(5):812-824. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwac008.
3
Auto-G-Computation of Causal Effects on a Network.网络上因果效应的自动G计算
J Am Stat Assoc. 2021;116(534):833-844. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2020.1811098. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
4
Machine Learning for Causal Inference: On the Use of Cross-fit Estimators.机器学习在因果推断中的应用:基于交叉拟合估计量的研究。
Epidemiology. 2021 May 1;32(3):393-401. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001332.
5
Array programming with NumPy.使用 NumPy 进行数组编程。
Nature. 2020 Sep;585(7825):357-362. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
6
Interdependence and the cost of uncoordinated responses to COVID-19.相互依存和应对 COVID-19 时缺乏协调的代价。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Aug 18;117(33):19837-19843. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2009522117. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
7
Lung cancer occurrence attributable to passive smoking among never smokers in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis.中国非吸烟者中被动吸烟导致肺癌发生的系统评价与Meta分析
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2020 Apr;9(2):204-217. doi: 10.21037/tlcr.2020.02.11.
8
Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Deaths - United States, 2017-2018.药物和阿片类药物相关过量死亡 - 美国,2017-2018 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Mar 20;69(11):290-297. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6911a4.
9
SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python.SciPy 1.0:Python 中的科学计算基础算法。
Nat Methods. 2020 Mar;17(3):261-272. doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
10
Social Influences on Obesity: Current Knowledge, Emerging Methods, and Directions for Future Research and Practice.社会因素对肥胖的影响:现有知识、新兴方法,以及未来研究和实践的方向。
Curr Nutr Rep. 2020 Mar;9(1):31-41. doi: 10.1007/s13668-020-00302-8.

具有干扰的因果效应的有针对性极大似然估计:一项模拟研究。

Targeted maximum likelihood estimation of causal effects with interference: A simulation study.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, UNC Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

Carolina Population Center, UNC Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Stat Med. 2022 Oct 15;41(23):4554-4577. doi: 10.1002/sim.9525. Epub 2022 Jul 18.

DOI:10.1002/sim.9525
PMID:35852017
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9489667/
Abstract

Interference, the dependency of an individual's potential outcome on the exposure of other individuals, is a common occurrence in medicine and public health. Recently, targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE) has been extended to settings of interference, including in the context of estimation of the mean of an outcome under a specified distribution of exposure, referred to as a policy. This paper summarizes how TMLE for independent data is extended to general interference (network-TMLE). An extensive simulation study is presented of network-TMLE, consisting of four data generating mechanisms (unit-treatment effect only, spillover effects only, unit-treatment and spillover effects, infection transmission) in networks of varying structures. Simulations show that network-TMLE performs well across scenarios with interference, but issues manifest when policies are not well-supported by the observed data, potentially leading to poor confidence interval coverage. Guidance for practical application, freely available software, and areas of future work are provided.

摘要

干扰,即个体的潜在结果依赖于其他个体的暴露,在医学和公共卫生领域很常见。最近,有针对性的最大似然估计(TMLE)已扩展到干扰的情况下,包括在指定暴露分布下的结果均值的估计中,这种情况下称为政策。本文总结了如何将独立数据的 TMLE 扩展到一般干扰(网络-TMLE)。我们进行了广泛的网络-TMLE 模拟研究,包括四种数据生成机制(仅单位治疗效果、仅溢出效应、单位治疗和溢出效应、感染传播)在不同结构的网络中。模拟结果表明,网络-TMLE 在存在干扰的情况下表现良好,但当政策与观察数据不匹配时,就会出现问题,这可能导致置信区间覆盖不良。我们提供了实践应用的指导、免费可用的软件以及未来工作的领域。