• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于粒子群算法和合作博弈模型的跨界流域水资源分配经济效益评价——以澜湄流域为例。

Economic benefit evaluation of water resources allocation in transboundary basins based on particle swarm optimization algorithm and cooperative game model-A case study of Lancang-Mekong River Basin.

机构信息

School of Business, Hohai University, Nanjing, China.

International River Research Centre, Hohai University, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Jul 19;17(7):e0265350. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265350. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0265350
PMID:35853085
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9295979/
Abstract

The present work aims to find the optimal solution of Nash Equilibrium (NE) in the traditional Game Theory (GT) applied to water resources allocation. Innovatively, this paper introduces Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) into GT to propose a cooperative game model to solve the NE problem. Firstly, the basic theory of the PSO algorithm and cooperative game model is described. Secondly, the PSO-based cooperative game model is explained. Finally, the PSO-based cooperative game model is compared with the Genetic Algorithm (GA) to test the performance. Besides taking the countries in Lancang Mekong River Basin as the research object, this paper discusses each country's water consumption and economic benefits under different cooperation patterns. Then, a series of improvement measures and suggestions are put forward accordingly. The results show that the average server occupancy time of the PSO-based cooperative game model is 78.46% lower than that of GA, and the average waiting time is 79.24% lower than that of the GA. Thus, the model reported here has higher computational efficiency and excellent performance than the GA and is more suitable for the current study. In addition, the multi-country cooperation mode can obtain more economic benefits than the independent water resource development mode. This model can quickly find the optimal combination of 16 cooperation modes and has guiding significance for maximizing the benefits of cross-border water Resource Utilization. This research can provide necessary technical support to solve the possible contradictions and conflicts between cross-border river basin countries and build harmonious international relations.

摘要

本研究旨在寻找传统博弈论(GT)在水资源分配中的纳什均衡(NE)的最优解。创新性地将粒子群优化(PSO)引入 GT 中,提出了一种合作博弈模型来解决 NE 问题。首先,介绍了 PSO 算法和合作博弈模型的基本理论。其次,解释了基于 PSO 的合作博弈模型。最后,将基于 PSO 的合作博弈模型与遗传算法(GA)进行比较,以测试性能。本研究以澜沧江湄公河流域国家为研究对象,讨论了不同合作模式下各国的用水量和经济效益。然后,提出了一系列改进措施和建议。结果表明,基于 PSO 的合作博弈模型的平均服务器占用时间比 GA 低 78.46%,平均等待时间比 GA 低 79.24%。因此,与 GA 相比,所提出的模型具有更高的计算效率和出色的性能,更适合当前的研究。此外,多国合作模式比独立水资源开发模式能获得更多的经济效益。该模型可以快速找到 16 种合作模式的最优组合,对实现跨境水资源利用效益最大化具有指导意义。本研究可为解决跨境流域国家可能存在的矛盾和冲突,构建和谐国际关系提供必要的技术支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eba/9295979/7d155abf10b4/pone.0265350.g019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eba/9295979/2cf6d38a4041/pone.0265350.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eba/9295979/b92cae74d53f/pone.0265350.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eba/9295979/10de49d06f7d/pone.0265350.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eba/9295979/491391d5e96a/pone.0265350.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eba/9295979/10e23f0a61d5/pone.0265350.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eba/9295979/fc14dbb8dbd4/pone.0265350.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eba/9295979/e52bb752847a/pone.0265350.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eba/9295979/524b3ec1fab6/pone.0265350.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eba/9295979/bed88e1a7d99/pone.0265350.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eba/9295979/4c2dc718946f/pone.0265350.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eba/9295979/2d289a3cafbb/pone.0265350.g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eba/9295979/c79a235a1a80/pone.0265350.g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eba/9295979/5f4616d1fcce/pone.0265350.g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eba/9295979/1407d49e6b46/pone.0265350.g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eba/9295979/2095eba093a7/pone.0265350.g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eba/9295979/4b26e8976b2d/pone.0265350.g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eba/9295979/aeb6484d8431/pone.0265350.g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eba/9295979/39ffd721dd1a/pone.0265350.g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eba/9295979/7d155abf10b4/pone.0265350.g019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eba/9295979/2cf6d38a4041/pone.0265350.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eba/9295979/b92cae74d53f/pone.0265350.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eba/9295979/10de49d06f7d/pone.0265350.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eba/9295979/491391d5e96a/pone.0265350.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eba/9295979/10e23f0a61d5/pone.0265350.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eba/9295979/fc14dbb8dbd4/pone.0265350.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eba/9295979/e52bb752847a/pone.0265350.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eba/9295979/524b3ec1fab6/pone.0265350.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eba/9295979/bed88e1a7d99/pone.0265350.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eba/9295979/4c2dc718946f/pone.0265350.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eba/9295979/2d289a3cafbb/pone.0265350.g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eba/9295979/c79a235a1a80/pone.0265350.g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eba/9295979/5f4616d1fcce/pone.0265350.g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eba/9295979/1407d49e6b46/pone.0265350.g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eba/9295979/2095eba093a7/pone.0265350.g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eba/9295979/4b26e8976b2d/pone.0265350.g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eba/9295979/aeb6484d8431/pone.0265350.g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eba/9295979/39ffd721dd1a/pone.0265350.g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eba/9295979/7d155abf10b4/pone.0265350.g019.jpg

相似文献

1
Economic benefit evaluation of water resources allocation in transboundary basins based on particle swarm optimization algorithm and cooperative game model-A case study of Lancang-Mekong River Basin.基于粒子群算法和合作博弈模型的跨界流域水资源分配经济效益评价——以澜湄流域为例。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 19;17(7):e0265350. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265350. eCollection 2022.
2
Fair and Reasonable Allocation of Trans-Boundary Water Resources Based on an Asymmetric Nash Negotiation Model from the Satisfaction Perspective: A Case Study for the Lancang-Mekong River Bain.基于满意度的非对称纳什谈判模型的跨界水资源公平合理分配——以澜沧江-湄公河为例
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 20;17(20):7638. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207638.
3
Analysis of long-term strategies of riparian countries in transboundary river basins.分析跨界河流流域的河岸国家的长期战略。
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 12;11(1):20199. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99655-5.
4
Evaluation of cooperative and non-cooperative game theoretic approaches for water allocation of transboundary rivers.评价跨界河流水资源分配的合作与非合作博弈理论方法。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 7;12(1):3991. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07971-1.
5
A cooperative game model with bankruptcy theory for water allocation: a case study in China Tarim River Basin.基于破产理论的水资源分配合作博弈模型:以中国塔里木河流域为例。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jan;29(2):2353-2364. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15748-8. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
6
Asymmetric Bargaining Model for Water Resource Allocation over Transboundary Rivers.跨界河流水资源分配的非对称谈判模型。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 May 16;16(10):1733. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16101733.
7
Multi-Objective Optimal Allocation of River Basin Water Resources under Full Probability Scenarios Considering Wet-Dry Encounters: A Case Study of Yellow River Basin.全概率情景下考虑干湿遭遇的流域水资源多目标优化配置:以黄河流域为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 6;18(21):11652. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111652.
8
Optimal Allocation of Water Resources and Eco-Compensation Mechanism Model Based on the Interval-Fuzzy Two-Stage Stochastic Programming Method for Tingjiang River.基于区间模糊两阶段随机规划方法的汀江流域水资源优化配置与生态补偿机制模型
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 23;19(1):149. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010149.
9
Does Information Asymmetry Impact Sub-Regions' Cooperation of Regional Water Resource Allocation?信息不对称是否影响区域水资源分配的次区域合作?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 5;16(21):4292. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16214292.
10
Multi-Objective Optimal Allocation of Water Resources Based on the NSGA-2 Algorithm While Considering Intergenerational Equity: A Case Study of the Middle and Upper Reaches of Huaihe River Basin, China.基于 NSGA-2 算法考虑代际公平的水资源多目标优化配置:以中国淮河流域中上游为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 11;17(24):9289. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249289.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of Particle Swarm Optimisation on a Hybrid Load Balancing Approach for Resource Optimisation in Internet of Things.粒子群优化对物联网资源优化混合负载均衡方法的影响。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Feb 20;23(4):2329. doi: 10.3390/s23042329.

本文引用的文献

1
Intercomparison of ten ISI-MIP models in simulating discharges along the Lancang-Mekong River basin.比较十种 ISI-MIP 模型在模拟澜沧江-湄公河流域径流量的表现。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Apr 15;765:144494. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144494. Epub 2020 Dec 24.
2
Inflation rate modeling: Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system approach and particle swarm optimization algorithm (ANFIS-PSO).通货膨胀率建模:自适应神经模糊推理系统方法与粒子群优化算法(ANFIS-PSO)
MethodsX. 2020 Sep 11;7:101062. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2020.101062. eCollection 2020.
3
Assessment of Agricultural Drought Risk in the Lancang-Mekong Region, South East Asia.
东南亚澜沧江-湄公河流域农业干旱风险评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 24;17(17):6153. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176153.
4
Salt-tolerant rice variety adoption in the Mekong River Delta: Farmer adaptation to sea-level rise.耐盐水稻品种在湄公河三角洲的采用:农民对海平面上升的适应。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 16;15(3):e0229464. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229464. eCollection 2020.
5
Distributed Generalized Nash Equilibrium Seeking Algorithm Design for Aggregative Games Over Weight-Balanced Digraphs.基于权重平衡有向图的聚合博弈分布式广义纳什均衡搜索算法设计
IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst. 2019 Mar;30(3):695-706. doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2018.2850763. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
6
Impacts of climate change on TN load and its control in a River Basin with complex pollution sources.气候变化对流域复杂污染源 TN 负荷及其控制的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Feb 15;615:1155-1163. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.288. Epub 2017 Oct 17.