Suppr超能文献

2000年至2012年美国痴呆症趋势的地区差异。

Regional variation in U.S dementia trends from 2000-2012.

作者信息

Ailshire Jennifer A, Walsemann Katrina M, Fisk Calley E

机构信息

Leonard Davis School of Gerontology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.

School of Public Policy, University of Maryland, College Park, USA.

出版信息

SSM Popul Health. 2022 Jul 7;19:101164. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101164. eCollection 2022 Sep.

Abstract

Although recent studies report a decline in dementia prevalence among U.S. older adults, national trends may mask subnational variation, particularly given large health and social inequalities linked to geography. To address this gap, we determined if there was subnational variation in reported national dementia trends and if region-specific trends were explained by sociodemographic and health characteristics. Data come from the 2000 (n = 10,447) and 2012 (10,426) waves of the Health and Retirement Study. We used validated methods for dementia classification using proxy and self-respondents. Logistic regression models, adjusted for within-person clustering over time, estimated trends in dementia prevalence by region and census division. We found subnational variation in dementia prevalence in both 2000 and 2012, as well as in change in dementia prevalence during this period. In 2000, dementia prevalence was lowest in the West (8.6%), higher in the Midwest (10.0%) and Northeast (11.1%), and highest in the South (14.6%). Dementia prevalence declined over time across all regions of the U.S. from 2000 to 2012 but remained highest in the South (10.7%) compared to the other regions (7.0-7.8%). Despite downward trends in dementia across the U.S., the prevalence of dementia in the South in 2012 approximated levels found in other regions in 2000. There was relatively less change over time in the West compared to other regions, but dementia prevalence was already quite low in the West in 2000. Within region, trends in dementia prevalence between 2000 and 2012 also varied slightly across census divisions. Subnational variation in changes in dementia prevalence were largely explained by education and health status. Variation in baseline prevalence, as well as differential rates of change, highlight the importance of examining subnational variation in dementia trends.

摘要

尽管最近的研究报告称美国老年人中痴呆症患病率有所下降,但全国趋势可能掩盖了地区差异,尤其是考虑到与地理位置相关的巨大健康和社会不平等。为了填补这一空白,我们确定了全国痴呆症趋势报告中是否存在地区差异,以及特定地区的趋势是否可以由社会人口统计学和健康特征来解释。数据来自《健康与退休研究》2000年(n = 10447)和2012年(10426)的调查。我们使用经过验证的方法,通过代理受访者和自我受访者对痴呆症进行分类。逻辑回归模型在对随时间的个体内聚类进行调整后,估计了各地区和普查区痴呆症患病率的趋势。我们发现2000年和2012年痴呆症患病率存在地区差异,以及在此期间痴呆症患病率的变化也存在地区差异。2000年,西部地区痴呆症患病率最低(8.6%),中西部地区(10.0%)和东北地区(11.1%)较高,南部地区最高(14.6%)。从2000年到2012年,美国所有地区的痴呆症患病率都随时间下降,但与其他地区(7.0 - 7.8%)相比,南部地区仍然最高(10.7%)。尽管美国各地痴呆症呈下降趋势,但2012年南部地区的痴呆症患病率接近其他地区2000年的水平。与其他地区相比,西部地区随时间的变化相对较小,但2000年西部地区的痴呆症患病率已经相当低。在各地区内部,2000年至2012年期间,不同普查区的痴呆症患病率趋势也略有不同。痴呆症患病率变化的地区差异在很大程度上由教育程度和健康状况来解释。基线患病率的差异以及变化率的不同,凸显了研究痴呆症趋势地区差异的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9148/9287555/26979db1f1f1/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验