Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine (W.S.P., J.A.C.L.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
Department of Epidemiology, Bloomberg School of Public Health (W.S.P., M.S.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
Circulation. 2022 Jul 19;146(3):229-239. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.059174. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
Despite improvements in population health, marked racial and ethnic disparities in longevity and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality persist. This study aimed to describe risks for all-cause and CVD mortality by race and ethnicity, before and after accounting for socioeconomic status (SES) and other factors, in the MESA study (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis).
MESA recruited 6814 US adults, 45 to 84 years of age, free of clinical CVD at baseline, including Black, White, Hispanic, and Chinese individuals (2000-2002). Using Cox proportional hazards modeling with time-updated covariates, we evaluated the association of self-reported race and ethnicity with all-cause and adjudicated CVD mortality, with progressive adjustments for age and sex, SES (neighborhood SES, income, education, and health insurance), lifestyle and psychosocial risk factors, clinical risk factors, and immigration history.
During a median of 15.8 years of follow-up, 22.8% of participants (n=1552) died, of which 5.3% (n=364) died of CVD. After adjusting for age and sex, Black participants had a 34% higher mortality hazard (hazard ratio [HR], 1.34 [95% CI, 1.19-1.51]), Chinese participants had a 21% lower mortality hazard (HR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.66-0.95]), and there was no mortality difference in Hispanic participants (HR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.86-1.14]) compared with White participants. After adjusting for SES, the mortality HR for Black participants compared with White participants was reduced (HR, 1.16 [95% CI, 1.01-1.34]) but still statistically significant. With adjustment for SES, the mortality hazards for Chinese and Hispanic participants also decreased in comparison with White participants. After further adjustment for additional risk factors and immigration history, Hispanic participants (HR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.63-0.94]) had a lower mortality risk than White participants, and hazard ratios for Black participants (HR, 1.08 [95% CI, 0.92-1.26]) and Chinese participants (HR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.60-1.08]) were not significantly different from those of White participants. Similar trends were seen for CVD mortality, although the age- and sex-adjusted HR for CVD mortality for Black participants compared with White participants was greater than all-cause mortality (HR, 1.72 [95% CI, 1.34-2.21] compared with HR, 1.34 [95% CI, 1.19-1.51]).
These results highlight persistent racial and ethnic differences in overall and CVD mortality, largely attributable to social determinants of health, and support the need to identify and act on systemic factors that shape differences in health across racial and ethnic groups.
尽管人口健康状况有所改善,但在长寿和心血管疾病(CVD)死亡率方面,仍存在明显的种族和民族差异。本研究旨在描述 MESA 研究(多民族动脉粥样硬化研究)中,在考虑社会经济地位(SES)和其他因素之前和之后,各种族和族裔的全因和 CVD 死亡率的风险。
MESA 招募了 6814 名美国成年人,年龄在 45 至 84 岁之间,基线时无临床 CVD,包括黑人、白人、西班牙裔和中国人(2000-2002 年)。使用 Cox 比例风险模型,我们评估了自报种族和族裔与全因和经裁决的 CVD 死亡率之间的关联,采用时间更新的协变量进行评估,逐步调整年龄和性别、SES(邻里 SES、收入、教育和健康保险)、生活方式和心理社会风险因素、临床风险因素和移民史。
在中位随访 15.8 年期间,22.8%的参与者(n=1552)死亡,其中 5.3%(n=364)死于 CVD。在调整年龄和性别后,黑人参与者的死亡率风险增加了 34%(风险比 [HR],1.34 [95%CI,1.19-1.51]),中国人参与者的死亡率风险降低了 21%(HR,0.79 [95%CI,0.66-0.95]),而西班牙裔参与者的死亡率风险与白人参与者无差异(HR,0.99 [95%CI,0.86-1.14])。在调整 SES 后,与白人参与者相比,黑人参与者的死亡率 HR 降低(HR,1.16 [95%CI,1.01-1.34]),但仍具有统计学意义。在调整 SES 后,与白人参与者相比,中国和西班牙裔参与者的死亡率风险也降低。进一步调整其他风险因素和移民史后,与白人参与者相比,西班牙裔参与者(HR,0.77 [95%CI,0.63-0.94])的死亡率风险较低,而黑人参与者(HR,1.08 [95%CI,0.92-1.26])和中国参与者(HR,0.81 [95%CI,0.60-1.08])的 HR 与白人参与者无显著差异。CVD 死亡率也出现了类似的趋势,尽管与白人参与者相比,黑人参与者的 CVD 死亡率的年龄和性别调整 HR 大于全因死亡率(HR,1.72 [95%CI,1.34-2.21] 与 HR,1.34 [95%CI,1.19-1.51])。
这些结果突出了全因和 CVD 死亡率方面持续存在的种族和民族差异,主要归因于健康的社会决定因素,并支持需要确定和采取行动,以解决影响不同种族和族裔群体健康的系统性因素。