• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症药物使用常规收集数据面临的挑战与机遇。来自18个欧洲国家卫生当局人员的观点。

Challenges and Opportunities With Routinely Collected Data on the Utilization of Cancer Medicines. Perspectives From Health Authority Personnel Across 18 European Countries.

作者信息

Pisana Alice, Wettermark Björn, Kurdi Amanj, Tubic Biljana, Pontes Caridad, Zara Corinne, Van Ganse Eric, Petrova Guenka, Mardare Ileana, Fürst Jurij, Roig-Izquierdo Marta, Melien Oyvind, Bonanno Patricia Vella, Banzi Rita, Marković-Peković Vanda, Mitkova Zornitsa, Godman Brian

机构信息

Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

Front Pharmacol. 2022 Jun 16;13:873556. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.873556. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fphar.2022.873556
PMID:35865969
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9295616/
Abstract

Rising expenditure for new cancer medicines is accelerating concerns that their costs will become unsustainable for universal healthcare access. Moreover, early market access of new oncology medicines lacking appropriate clinical evaluation generates uncertainty over their cost-effectiveness and increases expenditure for unknown health gain. Patient-level data can complement clinical trials and generate better evidence on the effectiveness, safety and outcomes of these new medicines in routine care. This can support policy decisions including funding. Consequently, there is a need for improving datasets for establishing real-world outcomes of newly launched oncology medicines. To outline the types of available datasets for collecting patient-level data for oncology among different European countries. Additionally, to highlight concerns regarding the use and availability of such data from a health authority perspective as well as possibilities for cross-national collaboration to improve data collection and inform decision-making. A mixed methods approach was undertaken through a cross-sectional questionnaire followed-up by a focus group discussion. Participants were selected by purposive sampling to represent stakeholders across different European countries and healthcare settings. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze quantifiable questions, whilst content analysis was employed for open-ended questions. 25 respondents across 18 European countries provided their insights on the types of datasets collecting oncology data, including hospital records, cancer, prescription and medicine registers. The most available is expenditure data whilst data concerning effectiveness, safety and outcomes is less available, and there are concerns with data validity. A major constraint to data collection is the lack of comprehensive registries and limited data on effectiveness, safety and outcomes of new medicines. Data ownership limits data accessibility as well as possibilities for linkage, and data collection is time-consuming, necessitating dedicated staff and better systems to facilitate the process. Cross-national collaboration is challenging but the engagement of multiple stakeholders is a key step to reach common goals through research. This study acts as a starting point for future research on patient-level databases for oncology across Europe. Future recommendations will require continued engagement in research, building on current initiatives and involving multiple stakeholders to establish guidelines and commitments for transparency and data sharing.

摘要

新型癌症药物支出的不断增加,正加速人们对其成本将使全民医疗保健难以承受的担忧。此外,缺乏适当临床评估的新型肿瘤药物过早进入市场,使其成本效益存在不确定性,并增加了在健康获益不明的情况下的支出。患者层面的数据可以补充临床试验,并为这些新药在常规治疗中的有效性、安全性和疗效提供更好的证据。这可以为包括资金分配在内的政策决策提供支持。因此,需要改进数据集,以确立新上市肿瘤药物的真实世界疗效。概述不同欧洲国家用于收集肿瘤学患者层面数据的可用数据集类型。此外,从卫生当局的角度强调对此类数据的使用和可得性的担忧,以及跨国合作改善数据收集并为决策提供信息的可能性。采用了混合方法,先进行横断面问卷调查,随后进行焦点小组讨论。通过目的抽样选择参与者,以代表不同欧洲国家和医疗环境中的利益相关者。描述性统计用于分析可量化问题,而内容分析用于开放式问题。来自18个欧洲国家的25名受访者就收集肿瘤学数据的数据集类型提供了见解,包括医院记录、癌症、处方和药品登记册。最容易获得的是支出数据,而关于有效性、安全性和疗效的数据较难获得,并且存在数据有效性方面的担忧。数据收集的一个主要制约因素是缺乏综合登记册,以及关于新药有效性、安全性和疗效的数据有限。数据所有权限制了数据的可获取性以及数据关联的可能性,并且数据收集耗时,需要有专门的工作人员和更好的系统来促进这一过程。跨国合作具有挑战性,但让多个利益相关者参与是通过研究实现共同目标的关键一步。本研究是欧洲未来肿瘤学患者层面数据库研究的起点。未来的建议将需要在当前举措的基础上继续参与研究,并让多个利益相关者参与,以建立透明度和数据共享的指导方针和承诺。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bcd/9295616/24dd78c332d2/fphar-13-873556-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bcd/9295616/d51cf1016451/fphar-13-873556-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bcd/9295616/d31ca0175ab7/fphar-13-873556-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bcd/9295616/7044361d4eaa/fphar-13-873556-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bcd/9295616/094d3eb10c84/fphar-13-873556-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bcd/9295616/ebaefadd68f3/fphar-13-873556-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bcd/9295616/24dd78c332d2/fphar-13-873556-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bcd/9295616/d51cf1016451/fphar-13-873556-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bcd/9295616/d31ca0175ab7/fphar-13-873556-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bcd/9295616/7044361d4eaa/fphar-13-873556-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bcd/9295616/094d3eb10c84/fphar-13-873556-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bcd/9295616/ebaefadd68f3/fphar-13-873556-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bcd/9295616/24dd78c332d2/fphar-13-873556-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Challenges and Opportunities With Routinely Collected Data on the Utilization of Cancer Medicines. Perspectives From Health Authority Personnel Across 18 European Countries.癌症药物使用常规收集数据面临的挑战与机遇。来自18个欧洲国家卫生当局人员的观点。
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Jun 16;13:873556. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.873556. eCollection 2022.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
A research roadmap for complementary and alternative medicine - what we need to know by 2020.补充和替代医学研究路线图——到2020年我们需要了解的内容。
Forsch Komplementmed. 2014;21(2):e1-16. doi: 10.1159/000360744. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
4
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
5
How Can Pricing and Reimbursement Policies Improve Affordable Access to Medicines? Lessons Learned from European Countries.定价与报销政策如何提高药品的可及性?从欧洲国家汲取的经验教训。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2017 Jun;15(3):307-321. doi: 10.1007/s40258-016-0300-z.
6
The reimbursement for expensive medicines: stakeholder perspectives on the SMA medicine nusinersen and the Dutch Coverage Lock policy.高价药品的报销:SMA 药物 nusinersen 和荷兰覆盖锁定政策的利益相关者观点。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Nov 4;22(1):1320. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08690-z.
7
The project data sphere initiative: accelerating cancer research by sharing data.项目数据领域计划:通过数据共享加速癌症研究
Oncologist. 2015 May;20(5):464-e20. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0431. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
8
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
9
Modelling approaches for histology-independent cancer drugs to inform NICE appraisals: a systematic review and decision-framework.基于组织学的癌症药物建模方法,为 NICE 评估提供信息:系统评价和决策框架。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Dec;25(76):1-228. doi: 10.3310/hta25760.
10
Achieving equal and timely access to innovative anticancer drugs in the European Union (EU): summary of a multidisciplinary CECOG-driven roundtable discussion with a focus on Eastern and South-Eastern EU countries.实现欧盟成员国平等、及时地获得创新抗癌药物的机会:以中东欧和东南欧国家为重点的跨学科 CECOG 驱动圆桌讨论综述。
ESMO Open. 2019 Nov 13;4(6):e000550. doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2019-000550. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
The unexploited potential of data systems tracking medicines utilization: an opportunity to improve access to oncology combination therapies.追踪药物使用情况的数据系统的未开发潜力:改善肿瘤联合疗法可及性的契机。
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Aug 20;16:1532022. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1532022. eCollection 2025.
2
Beyond the Pill: Mapping Process-Oriented Decision Support Models in Pharmaceutical Policy.超越避孕药:绘制药物政策中面向过程的决策支持模型
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 30;13(15):1861. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13151861.
3
Introduction of Biopharmaceuticals in Europe: A Cross-Sectional Study of Early Diffusion Patterns and Data Availability.

本文引用的文献

1
The Current Situation Regarding Long-Acting Insulin Analogues Including Biosimilars Among African, Asian, European, and South American Countries; Findings and Implications for the Future.当前非洲、亚洲、欧洲和南美洲国家(地区)长效胰岛素类似物(包括生物类似物)的现状;未来的发现和启示。
Front Public Health. 2021 Jun 24;9:671961. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.671961. eCollection 2021.
2
Real-world effectiveness of post-trastuzumab emtansine treatment in patients with HER2-positive, unresectable and/or metastatic breast cancer: a retrospective observational study (KBCSG-TR 1917).曲妥珠单抗-恩美曲妥珠单抗治疗后治疗人表皮生长因子受体 2 阳性、不可切除和/或转移性乳腺癌患者的真实世界疗效:一项回顾性观察研究(KBCSG-TR 1917)。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Jul 9;21(1):795. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08504-1.
3
欧洲生物制药的引入:早期扩散模式与数据可用性的横断面研究
BioDrugs. 2025 Aug 8. doi: 10.1007/s40259-025-00732-2.
4
Financial toxicity and socioeconomic impact of cancer in Europe.欧洲癌症的经济毒性和社会经济影响。
ESMO Open. 2025 Jun;10(6):105293. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105293. Epub 2025 Jun 9.
5
Access to innovative anticancer medicines in China: a national survey on availability, price and affordability.中国获得创新抗癌药物的情况:一项关于供应、价格和可负担性的全国性调查。
BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 25;14(4):e077089. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077089.
6
Treatment patterns, adherence to international guidelines, and financial mechanisms of the market access of advanced breast cancer therapy in Bulgaria.保加利亚晚期乳腺癌治疗的治疗模式、对国际指南的遵循情况以及市场准入的财务机制。
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 3;11:1073733. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1073733. eCollection 2023.
7
Procurement of medicines to treat cancer, 2015-2020, China.2015-2020 年中国癌症治疗药物采购情况。
Bull World Health Organ. 2022 Dec 1;100(12):758-768. doi: 10.2471/BLT.22.288420. Epub 2022 Nov 2.
Characterization of the Pharmaceutical Risk-Sharing Arrangement Process in Catalonia.加泰罗尼亚药品风险共担安排流程的特征描述。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2021 Sep;39(9):973-982. doi: 10.1007/s40273-021-01046-1. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
4
Persistence and adherence to non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation across five Western European countries.在五个西欧国家,房颤患者对非维生素 K 拮抗剂口服抗凝剂治疗的坚持和依从性。
Europace. 2021 Nov 8;23(11):1722-1730. doi: 10.1093/europace/euab091.
5
Retrospective analysis of real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer starting first-line systemic therapy in the United Kingdom.回顾性分析英国初治晚期非小细胞肺癌患者一线系统治疗的真实世界治疗模式和临床结局。
BMC Cancer. 2021 May 7;21(1):515. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08096-w.
6
The Value of Real-World Data in Understanding Prostate Cancer Risk and Improving Clinical Care: Examples from Swedish Registries.真实世界数据在理解前列腺癌风险及改善临床护理中的价值:来自瑞典登记处的实例
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Feb 19;13(4):875. doi: 10.3390/cancers13040875.
7
Can we achieve affordable cancer medicine prices? Developing a pathway for change.我们能否实现可负担的抗癌药物价格?探索变革之路。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2021 Jun;21(3):321-325. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2021.1898951. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
8
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
9
Potential approaches for the pricing of cancer medicines across Europe to enhance the sustainability of healthcare systems and the implications.欧洲癌症药物定价的潜在方法,以提高医疗保健系统的可持续性及其影响。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2021 Aug;21(4):527-540. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2021.1884546. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
10
Real-world safety of palbociclib in breast cancer patients in the United States: a new user cohort study.美国乳腺癌患者中帕博西尼的真实世界安全性:一项新的使用者队列研究。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Jan 25;21(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-07790-z.