• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国的机构发展与政府对新冠疫情的应对措施。

Institutional development and the government response to COVID-19 in China.

作者信息

Li Xin, Hui Eddie C M, Shen Jianfu

机构信息

School of Architecture, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.

Department of Building and Real Estate, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hum Hong, Hong Kong.

出版信息

Habitat Int. 2022 Sep;127:102629. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2022.102629. Epub 2022 Jul 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.habitatint.2022.102629
PMID:35874974
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9293789/
Abstract

As COVID-19 is pervasive across the globe, governments in different countries face the dilemma of restricting the transmission risk of the virus by social distancing while yet maintaining economic activity. Inadequate social distancing policies lead to more infection cases and deaths, while over stringent social distancing policies have significant economic cost implications. This study investigates the role of local government institutions in striking the balance between saving lives and economic recovery. We based our study on a sample of 28 provincial governments in China during the early outbreak of 2020 when the emergency responses of local governments were synchronous. The findings show that local governments in those provinces with lower degrees of marketization, which were accustomed to directly intervene in the social system, mandatorily quarantined many more close contacts for each confirmed case than those in the more market-oriented provinces whose social distancing policies took economic considerations into account. The 'overdone' (over stringent) social distancing policies in the more state-oriented provinces led to lower human mobility and economic growth. This study highlights the importance of taking economic considerations into account when adopting policies and strategies to combat the spread of COVID-19 and how different institution management cultures lead to different outcomes.

摘要

由于新冠疫情在全球范围内广泛传播,不同国家的政府面临着两难困境:既要通过社交距离措施来限制病毒传播风险,又要维持经济活动。社交距离政策不力会导致更多感染病例和死亡,而过于严格的社交距离政策则会产生重大的经济成本影响。本研究探讨地方政府机构在平衡拯救生命和经济复苏方面所起的作用。我们的研究基于2020年初中国28个省级政府的样本,当时地方政府的应急反应是同步的。研究结果表明,在市场化程度较低、习惯于直接干预社会系统的省份,每个确诊病例强制隔离的密切接触者比市场化程度较高、社交距离政策考虑经济因素的省份要多得多。在更倾向于国家主导的省份,“过度”(过于严格)的社交距离政策导致人员流动性降低和经济增长放缓。本研究强调了在采取抗击新冠疫情传播的政策和策略时考虑经济因素的重要性,以及不同的机构管理文化如何导致不同的结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20b0/9293789/f2700f37e09f/gr7_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20b0/9293789/eb626a5778b4/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20b0/9293789/ead98cca3b23/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20b0/9293789/2f9013dfc857/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20b0/9293789/b8bd01d63d84/gr4_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20b0/9293789/b82452bfa992/gr5_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20b0/9293789/48a05669c148/gr6_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20b0/9293789/f2700f37e09f/gr7_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20b0/9293789/eb626a5778b4/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20b0/9293789/ead98cca3b23/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20b0/9293789/2f9013dfc857/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20b0/9293789/b8bd01d63d84/gr4_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20b0/9293789/b82452bfa992/gr5_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20b0/9293789/48a05669c148/gr6_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20b0/9293789/f2700f37e09f/gr7_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Institutional development and the government response to COVID-19 in China.中国的机构发展与政府对新冠疫情的应对措施。
Habitat Int. 2022 Sep;127:102629. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2022.102629. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
2
Impact of self-imposed prevention measures and short-term government-imposed social distancing on mitigating and delaying a COVID-19 epidemic: A modelling study.自行采取预防措施和短期政府实施社会隔离对减轻和延缓 COVID-19 疫情的影响:建模研究。
PLoS Med. 2020 Jul 21;17(7):e1003166. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003166. eCollection 2020 Jul.
3
Economic impact of government interventions during the COVID-19 pandemic: International evidence from financial markets.新冠疫情期间政府干预措施的经济影响:来自金融市场的国际证据
J Behav Exp Finance. 2020 Sep;27:100371. doi: 10.1016/j.jbef.2020.100371. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
4
Untying the Precise Impact of COVID-19 Policy on Social Distancing Behavior.解开新冠疫情政策对社交隔离行为的精确影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 21;18(3):896. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18030896.
5
Optimal timing and effectiveness of COVID-19 outbreak responses in China: a modelling study.中国 COVID-19 疫情应对的最佳时机和效果:建模研究。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Apr 7;22(1):679. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12659-2.
6
The 2023 Latin America report of the Countdown on health and climate change: the imperative for health-centred climate-resilient development.《2023年健康与气候变化倒计时拉丁美洲报告:以健康为中心的气候适应型发展的必要性》
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Apr 23;33:100746. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100746. eCollection 2024 May.
7
Asynchrony Between Individual and Government Actions Accounts for Disproportionate Impact of COVID-19 on Vulnerable Communities.个体和政府行动之间的不同步导致了 COVID-19 对弱势群体社区的不成比例影响。
Am J Prev Med. 2021 Mar;60(3):318-326. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.10.012. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
8
Quantifying the Effects of Social Distancing on the Spread of COVID-19.量化社交隔离对 COVID-19 传播的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 23;18(11):5566. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115566.
9
First Wave of COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy: Data and Evidence.意大利的 COVID-19 大流行第一波:数据和证据。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2021;1353:91-113. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-85113-2_6.
10
The Impact of COVID-19 Management Policies Tailored to Airborne SARS-CoV-2 Transmission: Policy Analysis.《基于 SARS-CoV-2 空气传播的新冠管理政策的影响:政策分析》。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Apr 21;7(4):e20699. doi: 10.2196/20699.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of dual climatic and socioeconomic factors on global trends in infectious disease outbreaks.气候和社会经济双重因素对全球传染病暴发趋势的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 8;15(1):16092. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83431-2.
2
Addressing unforeseen public health risks via the use of sustainable system and process management.通过可持续的系统和流程管理来应对突发的公共卫生风险。
Front Public Health. 2023 Nov 10;11:1249277. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1249277. eCollection 2023.
3
Striving for wellbeing digitally in the city amidst the pandemic: Solidarity through Twitter in Ankara.

本文引用的文献

1
The short-term economic consequences of COVID-19: Exposure to disease, remote work and government response.COVID-19 对短期经济的影响:疾病暴露、远程办公和政府应对。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 15;18(3):e0270341. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270341. eCollection 2023.
2
Are high-density districts more vulnerable to the COVID-19 pandemic?高密度地区是否更容易受到新冠疫情的影响?
Sustain Cities Soc. 2021 Jul;70:102911. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102911. Epub 2021 Apr 3.
3
On the global COVID-19 pandemic and China's FDI.论全球新冠疫情与中国的外国直接投资
疫情期间在城市中通过数字手段追求福祉:安卡拉通过推特展现的团结。
Habitat Int. 2023 Jul;137:102846. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2023.102846. Epub 2023 May 25.
4
Analysis of the Return to Work Program for Disabled Workers during the Pandemic COVID-19 Using the Quality of Life and Work Ability Index: Cross-Sectional Study.新冠疫情期间残疾工人复工计划的生活质量和工作能力指数分析:横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 10;20(4):3094. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043094.
5
How does Covid-19 affect global equity markets?新冠病毒如何影响全球股票市场?
Financ Innov. 2022;8(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s40854-021-00330-5. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
6
COVID-19 and Regional Income Inequality in China.新冠疫情与中国地区收入不平等
Front Public Health. 2021 May 11;9:687152. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.687152. eCollection 2021.
J Asian Econ. 2021 Jun;74:101300. doi: 10.1016/j.asieco.2021.101300. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
4
China can prepare to end its zero-COVID policy.中国可以准备结束其新冠疫情清零政策。
Nat Med. 2022 Jun;28(6):1104-1105. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01794-3.
5
What determines urban resilience against COVID-19: City size or governance capacity?是什么决定了城市对新冠疫情的抵御能力:城市规模还是治理能力?
Sustain Cities Soc. 2021 Dec;75:103304. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103304. Epub 2021 Aug 28.
6
Governance, technology and citizen behavior in pandemic: Lessons from COVID-19 in East Asia.疫情中的治理、技术与公民行为:东亚地区新冠疫情的经验教训
Prog Disaster Sci. 2020 Apr;6:100090. doi: 10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100090. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
7
COVID-19 and Regional Income Inequality in China.新冠疫情与中国地区收入不平等
Front Public Health. 2021 May 11;9:687152. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.687152. eCollection 2021.
8
Smart city projects against COVID-19: Quantitative evidence from China.抗击新冠疫情的智慧城市项目:来自中国的量化证据
Sustain Cities Soc. 2021 Jul;70:102897. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102897. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
9
What determines city's resilience against epidemic outbreak: evidence from China's COVID-19 experience.是什么决定了城市对疫情爆发的抵御能力:来自中国新冠肺炎疫情经历的证据。
Sustain Cities Soc. 2021 Jul;70:102892. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102892. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
10
Human mobility restrictions and the spread of the Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in China.中国的人员流动限制与新型冠状病毒(2019-nCoV)的传播
J Public Econ. 2020 Nov;191:104272. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104272. Epub 2020 Sep 8.