• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估英国避免怀孕量表:包括预测效度的心理计量分析。

Evaluation of the Desire to Avoid Pregnancy Scale in the UK: a psychometric analysis including predictive validity.

机构信息

Reproductive Health Research, University College London, London, UK

Reproductive Health Research, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 25;12(7):e060287. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060287.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060287
PMID:35879004
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9328097/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the psychometric performance, including predictive validity, of a UK version of the Desire to Avoid Pregnancy (DAP) scale.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study for psychometric evaluation.

SETTING

UK.

PARTICIPANTS

Women in the UK aged 15 years to menopause, who were not pregnant at the time of recruitment in October 2018, were eligible. 994 women completed the baseline survey and 90.2% of women eligible for the 12-month survey participated.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The DAP scale was assessed according to key measurement properties of validity (construct (structural and hypothesis testing) and criterion (predictive)), reliability (internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha and test-retest using intraclass correlation coefficients, ICC) and differential item functioning. Item response and classical test theory methods were used.

RESULTS

The scale was acceptable, understandable and showed good targeting with the full range of scores captured. Construct validity was demonstrated on hypothesis testing, with odds of contraceptive use increasing threefold with each increasing DAP point (range: 0-4). Eighty per cent of women with the lowest DAP score became pregnant within 12 months, compared with <1% of those with the highest DAP score. Reliability, both in terms of internal consistency (Cronbach's α 0.96) and test-retest (ICC 0.95), was excellent. Some tests of structural validity, in relation to model fit with the item-response model, were not met, and investigations suggest further exploration of the factor structure of the DAP is required in other samples. Item 5, regarding relationship with a partner, showed differential item functioning by age, number of children and relationship group.

CONCLUSIONS

The UK DAP is a valid and reliable measure of women's DAP and is highly predictive of pregnancy within the next 12 months. Further evaluations should continue the assessment of the factor structure and the performance of the item relating to the partner.

摘要

目的

评估英国版生育意愿量表(DAP)的心理计量学性能,包括预测效度。

设计

心理计量学评估的前瞻性队列研究。

地点

英国。

参与者

2018 年 10 月招募时未怀孕、年龄在 15 岁至绝经期的英国女性符合条件。994 名女性完成了基线调查,有 90.2%符合 12 个月调查条件的女性参加了调查。

主要和次要结果测量

根据效度(结构(结构和假设检验)和标准(预测))、可靠性(内部一致性使用 Cronbach 的 alpha 和测试-重测使用组内相关系数,ICC)和差异项目功能评估 DAP 量表。使用项目反应和经典测试理论方法。

结果

该量表是可接受的,易于理解,并且具有良好的针对性,可以捕捉到整个分数范围。假设检验证明了结构效度,DAP 每增加一个点,避孕的可能性就会增加三倍(范围:0-4)。DAP 得分最低的 80%的女性在 12 个月内怀孕,而 DAP 得分最高的女性中不到 1%怀孕。可靠性方面,内部一致性(Cronbach 的α 0.96)和测试-重测(ICC 0.95)都非常好。与项目反应模型的结构有效性有关的一些测试,如模型拟合,未得到满足,研究表明,在其他样本中需要进一步探索 DAP 的因素结构。关于与伴侣关系的第 5 项,根据年龄、孩子数量和关系群体,显示出差异项目功能。

结论

英国版 DAP 是一种有效的、可靠的生育意愿测量工具,对未来 12 个月内怀孕具有高度预测性。进一步的评估应继续评估因素结构和与伴侣相关的项目的表现。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the Desire to Avoid Pregnancy Scale in the UK: a psychometric analysis including predictive validity.评估英国避免怀孕量表:包括预测效度的心理计量分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 25;12(7):e060287. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060287.
2
Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Reproductive Autonomy Scale for use in the UK.评估《生殖自主权量表》在英国使用的心理测量学特性。
BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2023 Jul;49(3):151-157. doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2022-201685. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
3
Measure of activity performance of the hand (MAP-Hand) questionnaire: linguistic validation, cultural adaptation and psychometric testing in people with rheumatoid arthritis in the UK.手部活动表现测量(MAP-Hand)问卷:在英国类风湿性关节炎患者中的语言验证、文化调适及心理测量测试
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Jul 31;19(1):275. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2177-5.
4
Evaluation of the Hindi version of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy among pregnant and postnatal women in urban India.评估印度版伦敦意外怀孕量表在印度城市孕妇和产后妇女中的应用。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Sep 4;21(1):602. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04075-y.
5
The psychometric properties and validity of the Turkish version of the Body Image in Pregnancy Scale (BIPS-Turkish).《孕期身体意象量表(BIPS-土耳其语版)》土耳其语版的心理测量学特性和有效性。
Women Health. 2022 Jan;62(1):21-36. doi: 10.1080/03630242.2021.2008584. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
6
Psychometric Evaluation of an Instrument to Measure Prospective Pregnancy Preferences: The Desire to Avoid Pregnancy Scale.测量预期妊娠偏好的工具的心理计量学评估:避免妊娠愿望量表。
Med Care. 2019 Feb;57(2):152-158. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001048.
7
Cultural adaptation and psychometric testing of The Scenario Test UK for people with aphasia.针对失语症患者的英国情景测试的文化适应性与心理测量测试
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2018 Jul;53(4):748-760. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12379. Epub 2018 Mar 3.
8
Validation of the female sexual distress scale-revised for assessing distress in women with hypoactive sexual desire disorder.用于评估性欲减退障碍女性困扰的女性性困扰量表修订版的效度验证。
J Sex Med. 2008 Feb;5(2):357-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2007.00672.x. Epub 2007 Nov 27.
9
Desire to Avoid Pregnancy scale: clinical considerations and comparison with other questions about pregnancy preferences.避免怀孕量表:临床考虑因素及与其他怀孕偏好问题的比较。
BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2023 Jul;49(3):167-175. doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2022-201750. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
10
Psychometric assessment of the Swedish version of the injustice experience questionnaire among patients with chronic pain.慢性疼痛患者中瑞典版不公正经历问卷的心理测量评估
Scand J Pain. 2021 Jul 29;21(4):732-742. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2020-0187. Print 2021 Oct 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Cultural adaptation and validation of the desire to avoid pregnancy scale in Brazil.巴西对避免怀孕意愿量表的文化调适与效度验证。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 28;20(7):e0327553. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327553. eCollection 2025.
2
Factors Associated With Contraceptive Initiation and Use Among Women Who Have Given Birth in the Last Year: Findings From the 2023 Women's Reproductive Health Survey.去年生育的女性中与开始使用和使用避孕药具相关的因素:2023年女性生殖健康调查结果
BJOG. 2025 Oct;132(11):1615-1625. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.18264. Epub 2025 Jul 9.
3
How, when, and who should ask about pregnancy intentions in primary care? A qualitative study of primary healthcare professionals' preferences.

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence of and factors associated with unplanned pregnancy among women in Koshu, Japan: cross-sectional evidence from Project Koshu, 2011-2016.日本甲州地区女性意外妊娠的流行状况及相关因素:2011-2016 年甲州项目的横断面证据。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Jul 9;20(1):397. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03088-3.
2
Opportunities for enhancing pregnancy planning and preconception health behaviours of Australian women.提高澳大利亚女性妊娠规划和孕前健康行为的机会。
Women Birth. 2021 Mar;34(2):e153-e161. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2020.02.022. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
3
Sample Size Requirements for Applying Mixed Polytomous Item Response Models: Results of a Monte Carlo Simulation Study.
在初级保健中,应该由谁、何时以及如何询问怀孕意向?一项关于初级保健专业人员偏好的定性研究。
BJGP Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(4). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0148. Print 2024 Dec.
4
Prevalence and factors associated with contraceptive use among sexually active adolescent girls in 25 sub-Saharan African countries.25 个撒哈拉以南非洲国家中活跃性少女避孕使用的流行情况及相关因素。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 28;19(2):e0297411. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297411. eCollection 2024.
5
How, when, and who should ask about pregnancy intentions in primary care? A qualitative study of women's preferences.在初级医疗保健中,应该如何、何时以及由谁来询问怀孕意向?一项关于女性偏好的定性研究。
Fam Pract. 2024 Apr 15;41(2):131-138. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmad114.
6
Predictive ability of the Desire to Avoid Pregnancy scale.《避免怀孕愿望量表的预测能力》。
Reprod Health. 2023 Sep 25;20(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s12978-023-01687-9.
7
Desire to Avoid Pregnancy scale: clinical considerations and comparison with other questions about pregnancy preferences.避免怀孕量表:临床考虑因素及与其他怀孕偏好问题的比较。
BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2023 Jul;49(3):167-175. doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2022-201750. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
应用混合多分类项目反应模型的样本量要求:蒙特卡罗模拟研究结果
Front Psychol. 2019 Nov 13;10:2494. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02494. eCollection 2019.
4
Recruitment via social media: advantages and potential biases.通过社交媒体进行招募:优势与潜在偏差。
Digit Health. 2019 Aug 6;5:2055207619867223. doi: 10.1177/2055207619867223. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
5
The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners.REDCap 联盟:构建软件平台合作伙伴的国际社区。
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208. Epub 2019 May 9.
6
Psychometric Evaluation of an Instrument to Measure Prospective Pregnancy Preferences: The Desire to Avoid Pregnancy Scale.测量预期妊娠偏好的工具的心理计量学评估:避免妊娠愿望量表。
Med Care. 2019 Feb;57(2):152-158. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001048.
7
Assessing test-retest reliability of patient-reported outcome measures using intraclass correlation coefficients: recommendations for selecting and documenting the analytical formula.评估患者报告结局测量的重测信度使用组内相关系数:选择和记录分析公式的建议。
Qual Life Res. 2019 Apr;28(4):1029-1033. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-2076-0. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
8
Reassessing pregnancy intention and its relation to maternal, perinatal and neonatal outcomes in a low-income setting: A cohort study.在低收入环境中重新评估妊娠意愿及其与母婴围产儿结局的关系:一项队列研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 18;13(10):e0205487. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205487. eCollection 2018.
9
The Use of Facebook in Recruiting Participants for Health Research Purposes: A Systematic Review.脸书在招募健康研究参与者中的应用:一项系统综述
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Aug 28;19(8):e290. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7071.
10
Exploring the factor structure of the Health of the Nation Outcomes Scale (HoNOS) in a sample of patients with schizophrenia, schizotypal and delusional disorders.在一组精神分裂症、分裂型障碍和妄想性障碍患者样本中探究国家健康结果量表(HoNOS)的因子结构。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Jul 14;15(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0701-1.