Suppr超能文献

六种矫正老花眼的人工晶状体的远近对比敏感度和视觉质量

Far and Near Contrast Sensitivity and Quality of Vision with Six Presbyopia Correcting Intraocular Lenses.

作者信息

Gil Miguel Á, Varón Consuelo, Cardona Genis, Buil José A

机构信息

Ophthalmology Department, Santa Creu and Sant Pau Hospital, Sant Quintí, 89, E08041 Barcelona, Spain.

Department of Optics and Optometry, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Violinista Vellsolà, 37, E08222 Terrassa, Spain.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2022 Jul 17;11(14):4150. doi: 10.3390/jcm11144150.

Abstract

The objective of this prospective, randomized, double-masked study was to compare the contrast sensitivity and quality of vision of patients bilaterally implanted with the following six different presbyopia correcting intraocular lenses (IOLs): SV25T0 ( = 19), ATLISA 809M ( = 18), ATLISA TRI 839MP ( = 19), ZKB00 ( = 20), ZLB00 ( = 20) and Symfony ZXR00 ( = 20). For comparison purposes, 36 patients were implanted with a monofocal lens (ZA9003). Contrast sensitivity was assessed binocularly at distance under photopic, mesopic and mesopic plus glare conditions, and at near under photopic conditions. Quality of vision was explored in terms of photic phenomena and spectacle independence. Overall, the monofocal lens offered better contrast sensitivity, under all illumination conditions, and less occurrence and intensity of photic phenomena. Amongst the multifocal IOL (MIOL) designs, the extended depth of focus Symfony ZXR00 provided better contrast sensitivity than the other MIOLs, particularly at intermediate and high spatial frequencies. Up to 40% and 50% of patients implanted with MIOLs reported glare and halos, respectively. The SV25T0 resulted in less occurrence and intensity of halos. The evaluation of photic phenomena and contrast sensitivity under different illumination conditions may reflect real-life, visually challenging situations, and thus provide insightful information to assist ophthalmic surgeons when selecting the best intraocular lens for their patients.

摘要

这项前瞻性、随机、双盲研究的目的是比较双侧植入以下六种不同老花眼矫正人工晶状体(IOL)的患者的对比敏感度和视觉质量:SV25T0(n = 19)、ATLISA 809M(n = 18)、ATLISA TRI 839MP(n = 19)、ZKB00(n = 20)、ZLB00(n = 20)和Symfony ZXR00(n = 20)。为作比较,36例患者植入了单焦点晶状体(ZA9003)。在明视、中间视觉和中间视觉加眩光条件下远距离双眼评估对比敏感度,在明视条件下近距离评估对比敏感度。从光现象和摆脱眼镜依赖方面探讨视觉质量。总体而言,单焦点晶状体在所有照明条件下提供更好的对比敏感度,且光现象的发生率和强度更低。在多焦点IOL(MIOL)设计中,扩展焦深的Symfony ZXR00比其他MIOL提供更好的对比敏感度,尤其是在中高空间频率下。分别有高达40%和50%植入MIOL的患者报告有眩光和光晕。SV25T0导致光晕的发生率和强度更低。在不同照明条件下评估光现象和对比敏感度可能反映现实生活中具有视觉挑战性的情况,从而为眼科医生为患者选择最佳人工晶状体时提供有见地的信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fef/9316344/f2c9f3938f97/jcm-11-04150-g001.jpg

相似文献

2
Visual acuity and defocus curves with six multifocal intraocular lenses.
Int Ophthalmol. 2020 Feb;40(2):393-401. doi: 10.1007/s10792-019-01196-4. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
3
Comparison of far and near contrast sensitivity in patients symmetrically implanted with multifocal and monofocal IOLs.
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2014 Jan-Feb;24(1):44-52. doi: 10.5301/ejo.5000335. Epub 2013 Jun 24.
4
Comparison of visual outcomes after implantation of AtLisa tri 839 MP and Symfony intraocular lenses.
Int Ophthalmol. 2020 Oct;40(10):2553-2562. doi: 10.1007/s10792-020-01435-z. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
5
One-year outcomes with new-generation multifocal intraocular lenses.
Ophthalmology. 2008 Sep;115(9):1508-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.04.017. Epub 2008 Jun 5.
8
Clinical and Visual Outcomes of Four Presbyopia Correcting Intraocular Lenses.
J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2024 Jun 21;19(2):152-160. doi: 10.18502/jovr.v19i2.11034. eCollection 2024 Apr-Jun.
9
Laboratory Evaluation of Halos and Through-Focus Performance of Three Different Multifocal Intraocular Lenses.
J Refract Surg. 2022 Sep;38(9):552-558. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20220802-02. Epub 2022 Sep 1.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Functional assessment of a new extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens.
Eye (Lond). 2019 Mar;33(3):404-410. doi: 10.1038/s41433-018-0221-1. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
2
Through-Focus Vision Performance and Light Disturbances of 3 New Intraocular Lenses for Presbyopia Correction.
J Ophthalmol. 2018 Jan 31;2018:6165493. doi: 10.1155/2018/6165493. eCollection 2018.
4
Comparative analysis of visual outcomes with 4 intraocular lenses: Monofocal, multifocal, and extended range of vision.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018 Feb;44(2):156-167. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.11.011.
5
Visual outcomes after progressive apodized diffractive intraocular lens implantation.
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2018 May;28(3):282-286. doi: 10.5301/ejo.5001030. Epub 2017 Nov 9.
8
Extended Depth of Focus IOLs: The Next Chapter in Refractive Technology?
J Refract Surg. 2017 Mar 1;33(3):146-149. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20170217-01.
9
Comparison of visual outcomes after bilateral implantation of extended range of vision and trifocal intraocular lenses.
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2017 Jun 26;27(4):460-465. doi: 10.5301/ejo.5000935. Epub 2017 Jan 28.
10
Special Report: American Academy of Ophthalmology Task Force Consensus Statement for Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses.
Ophthalmology. 2017 Jan;124(1):139-141. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.09.039. Epub 2016 Oct 13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验