Meintrup David, Nowak-Machen Martina, Borgmann Stefan
Faculty of Engineering and Management, University of Applied Sciences Ingolstadt, 85049 Ingolstadt, Germany.
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Ingolstadt Hospital, 85049 Ingolstadt, Germany.
Life (Basel). 2022 Jun 24;12(7):953. doi: 10.3390/life12070953.
(1) Background: Between March 2020 and January 2022 severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) caused five infection waves in Europe. The first and the second wave was caused by wildtype SARS-CoV-2, while the following waves were caused by the variants of concern Alpha, Delta, and Omicron respectively. (2) Methods: In the present analysis, the first four waves were compared in Germany and the UK, in order to examine the COVID-19 epidemiology and its modulation by non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPI). (3) Results: The number of COVID-19 patients on intensive care units and the case fatality rate were used to estimate disease burden, the excess mortality to assess the net effect of NPI and other measures on the population. The UK was more severely affected by the first and the third wave while Germany was more affected by the second wave. The UK had a higher excess mortality during the first wave, afterwards the excess mortality in both countries was nearly identical. While most NPI were lifted in the UK in July 2021, the measures were kept and even aggravated in Germany. Nevertheless, in autumn 2021 Germany was much more affected, nearly resulting in a balanced sum of infections and deaths compared to the UK. Within the whole observation period, in Germany the number of COVID-19 patients on ICUs was up to four times higher than in the UK. Our results show that NPI have a limited effect on COVID-19 burden, seasonality plays a crucial role, and a higher virus circulation in a pre-wave situation could be beneficial. (4) Conclusions: Although Germany put much more effort and resources to fight the pandemic, the net balance of both countries was nearly identical, questioning the benefit of excessive ICU treatments and of the implementation of NPI, especially during the warm season.
(1) 背景:2020年3月至2022年1月期间,严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型(SARS-CoV-2)在欧洲引发了五波感染。第一波和第二波由野生型SARS-CoV-2引起,而随后的几波分别由关注变体阿尔法、德尔塔和奥密克戎引起。(2) 方法:在本分析中,对德国和英国的前四波疫情进行了比较,以研究新冠疫情的流行病学及其受非药物干预措施(NPI)的影响。(3) 结果:使用重症监护病房中新冠患者的数量和病死率来估计疾病负担,用超额死亡率评估NPI和其他措施对人群的净影响。英国在第一波和第三波疫情中受影响更严重,而德国在第二波疫情中受影响更大。英国在第一波疫情期间超额死亡率更高,此后两国的超额死亡率几乎相同。虽然英国在2021年7月取消了大多数NPI措施,但德国保留了这些措施甚至使其更加严格。然而,在2021年秋季,德国受影响更大,与英国相比,感染和死亡总数几乎持平。在整个观察期内,德国重症监护病房中新冠患者的数量比英国高出四倍。我们的结果表明,NPI对新冠负担的影响有限,季节性起着关键作用,在疫情前阶段更高的病毒传播可能是有益的。(4) 结论:尽管德国在抗击疫情方面投入了更多努力和资源,但两国的净平衡几乎相同,这对过度的重症监护治疗和NPI措施的实施的益处提出了质疑,尤其是在温暖季节。