Kuroki Makoto, Yamamoto Kiyoshi, Goldfinch Shaun
School of Economics and Business Administration, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan.
Kamakura Women's University, Kamakura, Japan.
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Aug 2;6(8):e34268. doi: 10.2196/34268.
Trust in government is seen to facilitate crisis management and policy instrument adoption across numerous studies. However, in Japan, public support for government handling of the COVID-19 pandemic and trust in the government is low, yet the adoption of voluntary nondigital nonpharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) is high. This is an important tension this study seeks to unravel.
The aim of this study is to understand the antecedents of nondigital NPI and tracking app adoption in the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan.
A commercial company was contracted to deliver an online survey of 1248 Japanese citizens in December 2020. A quota technique was used to deliver a sample representative in terms of gender, age, residence, income, and education.
The adoption of voluntary nondigital NPIs is predicted by confidence in public health scientists and a favoring of infection control over reducing economic and social costs. A novel and unexpected finding is that trust in government does not predict nondigital NPI use. Perceived risk and knowledge of infection did not increase the use of nondigital NPIs. Education and income were not significant factors, although female and older respondents demonstrated greater compliance. For the adoption of a phone tracking app, trust in government is important, as is urban residence, albeit with a lower use of the app compared to nondigital NPIs.
Voluntary compliance in the adoption of nondigital NPIs-if skillfully led by trusted scientific experts and in accord with societal norms-can be effectively achieved. We provide evidence that trust in government is effective in encouraging the use of the Japanese tracking app. Moreover, the technical efficacy of digital initiatives and perceptions of such will unsurprisingly affect citizen support and use of digital tools.
众多研究表明,对政府的信任有助于危机管理和政策工具的采用。然而,在日本,公众对政府应对新冠疫情的支持度和对政府的信任度较低,但自愿采取非数字化非药物干预措施(NPIs)的比例却很高。这是本研究试图解开的一个重要矛盾点。
本研究旨在了解日本在新冠疫情期间非数字化NPIs和追踪应用程序采用的前因。
2020年12月,一家商业公司受委托对1248名日本公民进行在线调查。采用配额技术以获取在性别、年龄、居住地、收入和教育方面具有代表性的样本。
对公共卫生科学家的信心以及相较于降低经济和社会成本更倾向于感染控制,可预测自愿采取非数字化NPIs的行为。一个新颖且出乎意料的发现是,对政府的信任并不能预测非数字化NPIs的使用情况。感知到的风险和感染知识并未增加非数字化NPIs的使用。教育和收入并非重要因素,不过女性和年长受访者的依从性更高。对于手机追踪应用程序的采用,对政府的信任很重要,城市居住情况也是如此,尽管与非数字化NPIs相比,该应用程序的使用率较低。
如果由值得信赖的科学专家巧妙引导并符合社会规范,在采用非数字化NPIs方面的自愿依从性可以有效实现。我们提供的证据表明,对政府的信任在鼓励使用日本追踪应用程序方面是有效的。此外,数字举措的技术功效及其认知无疑会影响公民对数字工具的支持和使用。