• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Patient Preferences for Discussing and Acting on Health-Related Needs in Primary Care.患者对在初级保健中讨论和实施与健康相关需求的偏好。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2022 Jan-Dec;13:21501319221115946. doi: 10.1177/21501319221115946.
2
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
3
A qualitative analysis of interprofessional healthcare team members' perceptions of patient barriers to healthcare engagement.对跨专业医疗团队成员对患者参与医疗保健的障碍认知的定性分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Sep 20;16:493. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1751-5.
4
Implementing health-related social needs screening in western Colorado primary care practices: Qualitative research to inform improved communication with patients.在科罗拉多州西部初级保健机构中实施与健康相关的社会需求筛查:旨在改善与患者沟通的定性研究
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Sep;30(5):e3075-e3085. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13752. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
5
6
The impact of patient-generated contextual data on communication in clinical practice: A qualitative assessment of patient and clinician perspectives.患者生成的情境数据对临床实践中沟通的影响:基于患者和临床医生视角的定性评估。
Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Apr;103(4):734-740. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.10.020. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
7
Clinician Experiences with Screening for Social Needs in Primary Care.临床医生在初级保健中筛查社会需求的经验。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2018 May-Jun;31(3):351-363. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.03.170419.
8
Primary care providers' experiences caring for complex patients in primary care: a qualitative study.初级保健提供者在初级保健中照顾复杂患者的经历:一项定性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Mar 22;17:34. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0433-z.
9
Striving toward team-based continuity: provision of same-day access and continuity in academic primary care clinics.朝着基于团队的连续性努力:在学术性基层医疗诊所提供当日就诊机会和连续性服务。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Mar 4;19(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-3943-2.
10
"More than just giving them a piece of paper": Interviews with Primary Care on Social Needs Referrals to Community-Based Organizations.“不仅仅是给他们一张纸”:对初级保健机构向社区组织转介社会需求的访谈。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Dec;37(16):4160-4167. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07531-3. Epub 2022 Apr 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient Preferences for Addressing Unhealthy Behaviors, Mental Health Challenges, and Social Needs in Primary Care.患者对在初级保健中解决不健康行为、心理健康挑战和社会需求的偏好。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2024 Jan-Dec;15:21501319241307741. doi: 10.1177/21501319241307741.
2
Perspectives From Patients Using a Food Pantry in a Family Medicine Residency Clinic: A Qualitative Study.从家庭医学住院医师诊所使用食品储藏室的患者的角度看问题:一项定性研究。
Fam Med. 2024 Oct;56(9):584-587. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2024.613582. Epub 2024 Aug 9.
3
Diabetes and Depression: Strategies to Address a Common Comorbidity Within the Primary Care Context.糖尿病与抑郁症:在初级保健环境中应对常见共病的策略。
Am J Med Open. 2023 Feb 28;9:100039. doi: 10.1016/j.ajmo.2023.100039. eCollection 2023 Jun.
4
Designing an implementation strategy to increase health-related social needs screening: Applying the PRISM framework in a resource-limited clinical setting.设计一项实施策略以增加健康相关社会需求的筛查:在资源有限的临床环境中应用 PRISM 框架。
Transl Behav Med. 2024 Feb 23;14(3):197-205. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibad067.

本文引用的文献

1
Incorporation of Social Risk in US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations and Identification of Key Challenges for Primary Care.将社会风险纳入美国预防服务工作组的建议,并确定初级保健面临的主要挑战。
JAMA. 2021 Oct 12;326(14):1410-1415. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.12833.
2
Rapid versus traditional qualitative analysis using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).使用实施研究整合框架(CFIR)进行快速与传统定性分析。
Implement Sci. 2021 Jul 2;16(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01111-5.
3
Association between Food Insecurity and Health-Related Quality of Life: a Nationally Representative Survey.食物不安全与健康相关生活质量的关联:全国代表性调查。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Jun;36(6):1638-1647. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06492-9. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
4
Assessment of Social Risk Factors and Interest in Receiving Health Care-Based Social Assistance Among Adult Patients and Adult Caregivers of Pediatric Patients.评估社会风险因素以及儿科患者的成年患者和成年照顾者对接受基于医疗保健的社会援助的兴趣。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2021201. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.21201.
5
Patient and Community Organization Perspectives on Accessing Social Resources from the Emergency Department: A Qualitative Study.患者和社区组织对从急诊科获取社会资源的看法:一项定性研究。
West J Emerg Med. 2020 Jun 24;21(4):964-973. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.3.45932.
6
Do Patients Want Help Addressing Social Risks?患者希望解决社会风险吗?
J Am Board Fam Med. 2020 Mar-Apr;33(2):170-175. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2020.02.190309.
7
Effects of In-Person Assistance vs Personalized Written Resources About Social Services on Household Social Risks and Child and Caregiver Health: A Randomized Clinical Trial.关于社会服务的面对面援助与个性化书面资源对家庭社会风险及儿童和照顾者健康的影响:一项随机临床试验
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e200701. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0701.
8
Patient Perspectives on Addressing Social Needs in Primary Care Using a Screening and Resource Referral Intervention.患者对通过筛查和资源转诊干预在初级保健中满足社会需求的看法。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Feb;35(2):481-489. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05397-6. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
9
Part II: A Qualitative Study of Social Risk Screening Acceptability in Patients and Caregivers.第二部分:患者和照护者对社会风险筛查可接受性的定性研究。
Am J Prev Med. 2019 Dec;57(6 Suppl 1):S38-S46. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.07.016.
10
Comparison of rapid vs in-depth qualitative analytic methods from a process evaluation of academic detailing in the Veterans Health Administration.从退伍军人健康管理局的学术细化过程评估比较快速与深入的定性分析方法。
Implement Sci. 2019 Feb 1;14(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0853-y.

患者对在初级保健中讨论和实施与健康相关需求的偏好。

Patient Preferences for Discussing and Acting on Health-Related Needs in Primary Care.

机构信息

Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, USA.

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

出版信息

J Prim Care Community Health. 2022 Jan-Dec;13:21501319221115946. doi: 10.1177/21501319221115946.

DOI:10.1177/21501319221115946
PMID:35920033
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9358340/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Addressing social needs, health behaviors, and mental health may help patients more than traditional medical care. However, these root causes of poor health are difficult to address and the role of primary care is unclear. This qualitative study assesses patient's willingness and motivations to discuss and accept assistance for these needs from their primary care team.

METHODS

In July and August of 2020, semi-structured virtual interviews were conducted with family medicine patients (n = 6) and residents of low resource neighborhoods (n = 11) in Richmond, Virginia. Interviews were conducted over Zoom. We conducted a qualitative analysis of patient and resident interview transcripts. A rapid qualitative analysis approach and immersion-crystallization processes were used to identify themes and categories.

RESULTS

Interviewees reported varying degrees of comfort discussing topics with their health care team. They were less comfortable discussing needs they considered outside the realm of "traditional primary care" including finances, transportation, and housing, but interviewees expressed willingness to discuss these needs under certain conditions. Important factors were a strong patient-clinician relationship to create a trusted and safe space for discussion, adequate time for discussion during visits, communication of practices' ability to provide resources to help patients, and ensuring appropriate high quality referrals.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary care provides opportunity for identifying and addressing needs that adversely impact health. Some needs are more sensitive for patients to work with their care team on, though, there was willingness to work on need when a strong provider relationship and clinic structure for providing support were in place. This study highlights critical care delivery factors which may be used to enhance patient comfort accepting support for their needs and ultimately improve clinical care and chronic disease management.

摘要

背景

解决社会需求、健康行为和心理健康问题可能比传统的医疗护理更能帮助患者。然而,这些健康不良的根本原因难以解决,基层医疗的作用也不明确。本定性研究评估了患者是否愿意并愿意接受其基层医疗团队讨论和接受这些需求援助。

方法

2020 年 7 月至 8 月,在弗吉尼亚州里士满对家庭医学患者(n=6)和资源匮乏社区居民(n=11)进行了半结构化虚拟访谈。访谈通过 Zoom 进行。我们对患者和居民访谈记录进行了定性分析。采用快速定性分析方法和沉浸结晶过程来确定主题和类别。

结果

受访者报告了在与医疗团队讨论某些话题时的舒适度有所不同。他们不太愿意讨论他们认为超出“传统初级保健”范围的需求,包括财务、交通和住房,但受访者表示愿意在某些条件下讨论这些需求。重要因素包括医患关系牢固,为讨论创造一个信任和安全的空间、在就诊期间有足够的讨论时间、沟通诊所提供资源帮助患者的能力,以及确保适当和高质量的转诊。

结论

初级保健为识别和解决对健康有不利影响的需求提供了机会。有些需求患者更愿意与他们的医疗团队一起解决,尽管在建立了牢固的提供者关系和诊所提供支持的结构的情况下,他们愿意解决这些需求。这项研究强调了关键的医疗服务提供因素,这些因素可以用来提高患者接受支持其需求的舒适度,最终改善临床护理和慢性病管理。